Obama, Congress Not Likely to Engage on Libya Yet

Neither branch is willing to test the War Powers Act

May 18, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

Members of Congress on both sides have largely remained quiet about the president's actions in Libya, a stance that could work in their benefit politically. Without Congress having to take a vote on the use of armed forces, blame for possible failures in Libya could be deflected to the presidency. Lindsay guesses that Congress won't act until the general public voices discontent over what the president is doing. "Congress is most likely to challenge the president on the War Powers Resolution if the U.S. commitment in Libya expands, or the civil war doesn't come to a conclusion," he says. "Congress is most adamant when the public is most upset, and we're not there at this point."

According to James Carafano, director of the Center for Foreign Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think-tank based in Washington, the lukewarm response from Congress also could help Obama as he defines the country's role in Libya. "The president kind of gets a get-out-of-jail-free card. You've got Democrats and Republicans, even within their own sides, on all sides of this issue. There's really no critical mass of people that are going to come out and criticize the president," he says. "I don't sense any appetite from anybody seriously in Congress from really holding the president to the 60-day deadline."

While leadership in both parties hasn't taken a strong position either way, Indiana Republican Sen. Dick Lugar, ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has come out strongly against the president for not consulting enough with Congress on a Libya strategy. In a press release Friday, he said that "if the administration seeks to continue our military involvement in Libya, it is incumbent that they seek and secure Congressional authorization." According to Lugar's spokesman, Mark Helmke, the senator is waiting to see how the president plans to move forward before introducing any legislative or legal action to uphold the resolution.

It's still unknown how the president plans to proceed, but he may address his strategy in a speech on the Middle East scheduled for Thursday at the State Department.

Tags:
Congress,
Richard Lugar,
Libya,
John McCain,
national security terrorism and the military,
Democratic Party,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If the cause is just, then let Congress declare war or authorize further US involvement. In a democracy, it is ultimately the responsibility of citizens, and their elected representatives (in this case, Congress, who are closer to constituents) to decide whether the country should be involved.

The argument that UN Resolution 1973 somehow renders the War Powers Act inapplicable in this case is specious. By that logic, whenever the US wanted to intervene in a foreign country, it could influence the UN, NATO, or any other ally to authorize the intervention; then the US could say, "we're only fighting because the UN or NATO or our ally wants it." In short, the War Powers Act would have no meaning at all.

George C. of CA 11:14AM May 18, 2011

The War Powers Act is a tool for the sections of Government in the US to agree on whether aggression by the US is justified. I believe the War powers laws were put in place back when Andrew Jackson was President and while presided over the shameful trail of tears. Congress did not want the Executive branch to have that power again without Congressional approval. However, Legitimizing professional people(Transitional National Government) and the Freedom Fighters of Libya has nothing to do with the War Power Act congress made law to force the Executive branch to get Congressional approval for aggressive action on a foreign nation. Also the UN approved the action, in Libya to a point. So what's the problem with making the transitional government legitimate, only thing I can think is that the Billions of frozen Gaddafi money is coveted by some in the US. I hope not, However; I would not be surprised. There is support for the action in Libya in both major poetically parties in American and see no reason the Professional team of men and women and the Freedom Fighters (Who did the hard work on the ground) can't be legitimized. The US must legitimize them quickly as it was the US that supported them from the beginning. In addition it is in the West's Interest including the USA to see a free Arab Spring in Libya.

estebangonzolaz of CA 10:46AM May 18, 2011

Obama is a lying lawless warmonger. I demand an immediate arrest warrant for the Pope for crimes against humanity. I demand the Pope be held accountable for all crimes against little boys and innocent people burned alive by his band of demons. You can't just be a citizen on paper folks; you have to be indoctorinated through the public school system i.e. brainwashed into being a good America. Patriotism, nationalism whatever you want to call it comes from saying the Pledge of Alleigiance evey morning - Im pretty sure Obama missed out on all that. How about we vote more than just a "paper citizen" into office next time?

Rachel of CA 9:47AM May 18, 2011

Photo Galleries

Storms, Wildfires Tear Across U.S.

Heavy rain, high winds and fire continue to plague regions throughout the country.

advertisement

Latest Videos