NY 26 Special Election Brings Deja Vu for Upstate New York

But outside groups are spending less money than in 2009's special election

May 17, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

Upstate New Yorkers may be feeling a distinct sense of deja vu lately. The May 24 special election in the state's 26th Congressional District, in the far western part of the state, is drawing inevitable comparisons to the November 2009 special election in the 23rd district, which covers New York's northernmost region: a tight race in which a third-party challenger is forcing the Republican candidate to fight on two fronts, to the benefit of the Democrat. Heavy spending by outside PACs and national party committees was a key factor in the 2009 race, as in the current special election. However, a look at the data shows that the 2009 race involved far more outside spending than this year's.

It has been widely reported that outside groups are dropping major money in advance of the race in the 26th district, a seat open since married Republican Rep. Chris Lee resigned in February after it was revealed he was seeking women on Craigslist. However, current spending doesn't hold a candle to the 2009 race. Seven days before the special election, outside groups and party committees have reported spending over $1.2 million on ads supporting or opposing Democrat Kathy Hochul, Republican Jane Corwin, and Tea Party candidate Jack Davis. Seven days prior to the 2009 election, outside groups had reported spending more than $2.9 million on that race, in which Democrat Bill Owens defeated Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman and Republican Dede Scozzafava, who dropped out and threw her support to Owens days before the vote. Altogether, outside spending in that race totaled over $3.8 million, according to FEC data.

This apparent spending discrepancy comes despite the landmark January 2010 Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United vs. FEC, which opened the floodgates for corporations and unions to spend directly on political ads, and helping make the 2010 election season the most expensive midterm election of all time.

The spending totals from 2009 tower over this year's in part because of the third-party candidates' sources of support. In 2009, independent Doug Hoffman drew major support from social conservative groups like the Susan B. Anthony List and the National Organization for Marriage, as well as the economically conservative Club for Growth. In contrast, no outside groups have spent on behalf of the current third-party candidate, Jack Davis--who, despite nominally being the Tea Party candidate, has been shunned by state and national Tea Party organizations alike. and has also been heavily targeted by both Corwin and Hochul. However, Davis, a wealthy businessman who ran unsuccessfully for the seat as a Democrat in 2004, 2006, and 2008, has spent over $2.1 million of his own money on the race.

Michael Beckel, spokesman for the Center for Responsive Politics, a non-partisan campaign finance watchdog organization, says that Davis' self-funding has certainly helped him to gain support, despite being a third-party candidate. "Name recognition is a huge factor in any race, and being able to pony up a few million dollars of your own money on election day is a big deal," says Beckel. His three prior runs for the seat also likely make him a known commodity to local voters. A recent Public Policy Polling poll shows Davis with 24 percent of potential voters, compared to 31 percent for Corwin and 35 percent for Hochul.

Spending in 2009's special election may have been more intense simply because the stakes were high for both parties. The Republican Party faced a hard-fought internal battle as conservative insurgent Hoffman took on moderate, establishment pick Scozzafava. Democrats, meanwhile, wanted as much power in the House as they could get, as "they had a lot of campaign promises they were hoping to move forward on," according to Beckel. This time around, however, he says, "With the Republicans in control of the House, one more vote for Republicans might not be as powerful for Republicans this year."

Of course, the final week before a race usually brings a deluge of advertising buys. so spending in New York's 26th will doubtless accelerate in the coming days. For example, a spokesman for American Crossroads, a conservative political action committee cofounded by former George W. Bush strategist Karl Rove, says that the group "will announce in the coming days its plans for the final week" in the special election. The group has already spent nearly $370,000, according to the Federal Election Commission. So while the totals may not ultimately rival 2009's, residents of New York's 26th District can still expect one more week of nonstop political messaging.

Tags:
Congress,
campaigns,
elections,
New York

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The district runs from the wealthy Buffalo suburbs to the wealthy Rochester suburbs with very red rural areas between them. It was specifically gerrymandered to produce a Republican winner...just like NY 28 was created to produce a Democrat.

zibby of NY 10:17AM May 18, 2011

Ryan's Road to Prosperity and the CEO Oil Magnate who spoke of "shared prosperity," not 'shared sacrifice,' only confirms the route the Republicans want our country to take...an oligarchy of the wealthy...not a semi-democracy of the people! Look at the voting laws the Republicans are in a hurry to enact before the 2012 elections...rather than working to "get out the vote," Republican are determined to get rid of the voters who are not white, rich, middle aged, and Christian: Who are against government regulation of any phase of business (incuding food inspection, evironment protection and financial institutions): And, above all, these new voting regulations will ensure that the legally registered voter in 2012 must be radically conservative. When all these identification and disguised poll taxes are established, no students, handicapped (including wounded soldiers) seniors, minorities, apartment dwellers who might have moved across town in the last 3 months, or poor need bother showing up at the polls. Even Ronald Regan would have a hard time call us a "shinning city on a hill." And, I don't think he would be allowed to be the standard bearer of this Republican party.

We really need to elect the Democratic candidate in the 26th to prevent the spread of this Tea Party ideology and to say: "NO MORE RICHES TO THE RICHEST." No more oil company subsidies! No more CEO golden parachutes! No more cuts to education, police and fire departments. Yes! to public spending on infrastructure and medical research, including stem cell research. No more assaults on women's health care and Yes! to Family Planning Centers/ Planned Parenthood! Another win for the Radica Right will further erode whatever democratic principles are still alive.

The 26th is just one battlefield we must capture on our way to taking back our country from those who would turn back the American clock to the 19th century

Lady Ruby of NY 8:41AM May 18, 2011

but my guess is that they are conservative as defined 30 years ago -when most of the GOP was in favor of Social Security, when they supported Medicare, when people like Gingrich, Boehner, and many other hardliners now supported the single-payer mandate for health insurance, when defense spending was a half $TRILLION lower than now.

Conservative used to mean good sense financially. It did not mean tossing old people and poor folks and the middle class under the bus so abortion activists, big business puppets, union-busters, teacher-degraders and private schools for profit sponsors could take over.

Real conservatives (meaning non-radicals) remember when the budget was balanced in 1999. What is different now in so few years? What have we done that is not paid for?

2 wars costing over 3 $TRILLION $250 billion/year right now

tax cuts costing over $3 TRILLION $400 billion/year now

other defense spending growth

$2 TRILLION $200 billion/year

2 refunds of the surplus $520 billion

200 new military bases globally $150 billion/year

Interest on the debt since 2000 $100 billion/year new

After Vietnam we had a surtax - 10% - until that debt was paid. Afte WWII, the same. These radical conservatives like Paul Ryan think we can keep the bloated military, cut taxes, cut all social programs, and somehow pay off our debts? No way.

The GOP candidate in Buffalo seems to agree with Mr. Ryan. Talk about "voodoo-economics"!

The peope in BUffalo had best see that for this election - the only real conservative (sensible person) in the whole pack of candidates is the Democrat this time around. Yes - the political "middle " has moved so far to the right, this is now true.

I hope they see that party politics defined in 1980's terms do no apply here. The GOP and Tea Party are aligned becase the GOP is afraid of upsetting the extreme right, Boehner is not leading anyone...just trying to get by.

The HOuse GOP/TP voted almost unanimously for the Ryan bill. Cuts we need. But think real hard about what we have changed since the budegt balanced, and you will see that the Ryan plan and the GOP do NOT have the solution.

DeeToo of SC 1:42PM May 17, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos