Do Americans Care About Climate Change Anymore?

Talk of global warming has given way to green jobs and energy security

April 27, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (15)

Earth Day, for some, is a yearly excuse to throw on a tie-dyed T-shirt, spend some time in the sun, and get some grass between the toes. In years past, it had also marked an opportunity for liberal policymakers and environmentalists to band together to warn about the effects of climate change. But today, climate change has taken a back seat to talk of clean technologies and energy security.

Washington is still full of people who warn about the dangers of carbon emissions. Take the Democrats in the ongoing debate in Congress over the Environmental Protection Agency's power to curb greenhouse gases. But the reality, and perhaps the one thing that experts on both sides of the debate agree on, is that Americans are paying less attention to global warming than they have in the past.

[See a slide show of 10 Reasons Americans Aren't Talking About Climate Change]

TV network news coverage of the issue in the United States reached its peak around mid-2006 and into the first three quarters of 2007, says Robert Brulle, an environmental sociology professor at Drexel University who has studied data on the media and global warming since the 1980s. By the fall of 2008, coverage had begun to drop off dramatically, apart from a huge spike around the United Nations climate change conference in Copenhagen in December 2009. Now, data show that the country's major media outlets mention climate change about as much as they did in 2004 and 2005. Analyses of the nation's major print media outlets show similar trends.

And the issue's lower profile seems to be having an effect on public opinion. Polls from George Mason University's Center for Climate Change Communication show that Americans' worry about climate change was at a zenith around November 2008, with 54 percent saying that it should be a high priority for the government. Last June, however, only about 44 percent said it should be a high priority. A Gallup poll from last month found that Americans rated global warming as the environmental problem they worry about the least.

Despite the waning levels of concern, the bulk of environmentalists argue that the threat hasn't changed. Naomi Oreskes, a science historian and coauthor of Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, says major climate scientists unequivocally agree that global warming is caused by humans. The problem, she says, is still as real and as serious as they thought it was during the height of public awareness. So, what's caused this gradual decline of public interest?

[See a slide show of the 10 states that use the least energy.]

Some point to the doubt that may have arisen from scientists' inability to agree on a tipping point, when climate change would have a noticeable effect. Without such a deadline, the urgency fades. The controversy that erupted when the honesty of British climatologists was called into question—following a leak of E-mails in late 2009—may also have affected public opinion, although the scientists were eventually exonerated.

But even the peaks of interest can be pinned to major events, not necessarily to a growing concern. Former vice president and future Nobel Peace Prize recipient Al Gore sparked increased interest when he released his documentary on the climate change crisis, An Inconvenient Truth, in May 2006. Another major spike was in 2007, when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released its most recent report. By contrast, experts suggest that the crash of the economy in the fall of 2008 may have reversed the tides.

As Americans lost their jobs, climate change became a less immediate worry. The Obama administration took note, adopting more immediate economic proposals, like the "green jobs" initiative in 2009 and this year's announcement of clean energy goals. Former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, who now works with the Pew Clean Energy Program to promote clean energy policy, says that since Americans care more about jobs, it would be a waste of time to debate climate change. "What's important to talk about are the things that we can get done right now. A lot of energy has been spent in the past on debating whether or not climate change is caused by humans or by nature, but the bottom line is, this sector is growing and we need jobs, so let's take advantage of it now," she says.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
energy policy and climate change,
Republican Party,
John Boehner,
Nancy Pelosi

Reader Comments Read all comments (15)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Good science is based on proven testing.

I know from proven testing that CO2 is still a proven refrigerant since 1835, and patented as a refrigerant in 1924, my testing shows CO2 is ~ still ~ a refrigerant, at any temperature or pressure.

That is how I know what is real and what is not, I tested already proven science.

Science is to Know.

Bruce A. Kershaw of MT 10:15AM May 07, 2011

Please explain how man caused CO2 causes climate change.

Since no one else can.

Thats way people are not buying in to the Religion.

Al gore said so, ant good enough.

Not once has the government or Media ever explained in any way shape or form on any level, How man caused CO2 causes climate change.

A snake oil salesman, can not tell you whats in the bottle, or how it works, he just wants you to trust him.

Science is about provable fact, not belief.

Bruce A. Kershaw of MT 2:34PM May 06, 2011

How about the very first open public debate in science, on CO2 and Atmosphere.

Why will no one on your side of science, debate the science?

http://co2u.info

Bruce A. Kershaw of MT 7:24PM May 05, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos