S&P Downgrades Outlook on National Debt

April 18, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

WASHINGTON— Standard & Poor's Ratings Service downgraded its outlook Monday on U.S. government debt, expressing unprecedented doubts over the ability of Washington to bring the massive federal budget deficits under control.

The agency lowered the long-term outlook to "Negative" from "Stable," saying there is a one in three chance the United States could lose its top investment rating on its debt in the next two years.

S&P said it has little confidence that the White House and Congress will agree on a deficit-reduction plan before the fall 2012 elections and doubts any plan would be in place until after 2014.

The government is on pace to run a record $1.5 trillion deficit this year, the third consecutive deficit exceeding $1 trillion. President Barack Obama and congressional Republicans are sparring over how to reduce the nation's red ink. Their differences over where to cut have put a crucial decision over raising the nation's debt limit in jeopardy. [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on the budget and deficit.]

"We see the path to agreement as challenging because the gap between the parties remains wide," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Nikola G. Swann.

Stocks plunged after the rating agency lowered its outlook The Dow Jones industrial average fell more than 200 points in afternoon trading.

S&P reaffirmed its investment-grade credit ratings on the U.S. long- and short-term debt itself. But it said the U.S. government is in danger of losing the top ranking if it doesn't come up with a credible plan for reducing its debt. [Read Robert Schlesinger: Where did the national debt come from?]

The agency gives its top investment rating to just 19 of the 127 countries it analyzes. But it says Britain, France and Germany have moved much more quickly to contain deficits after the 2008 financial crisis and 2007-2009 recession — which cut tax revenues and forced governments to spend more on unemployment benefits, aid to the poor and bailouts of the banking system.

S&P said the U.S. has a fundamentally strong, diversified economy. Still, the agency noted that the U.S. deficit grew to 11 percent of gross domestic income in 2009. That is much higher than the 5 percent or less the country had averaged in the previous six years.

Obama and Republicans have each proposed plans that would cut $4 trillion from future deficits over the next 12 years.

The White House wants to reduce the deficit through spending cuts and by ending tax cuts for the wealthy enacted during the presidency of George W. Bush. Congressional Republicans oppose that approach, rejecting what they see as an increase in taxes. They seek instead to narrow the deficit largely by overhauling Medicare and cutting spending elsewhere.

Mary Miller, the assistant Treasury secretary for financial markets, said S&P "underestimates the ability of America's leaders to come together to address the difficult fiscal challenges facing the nation."

The president and Congress are working on ways to reduce budget deficits over the long term, she said.

The fight over the deficit and next year's budget is threatening the government's ability to borrow. Analysts say S&P is warning the two parties not to play politics with the debt ceiling.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Sunday that Republican leaders have privately assured the Obama administration that Congress will raise the government's borrowing limit in time to avoid an unprecedented default on the nation's debt. [Check out editorial cartoons about the economy.]

Tags:
Congress,
2012 presidential election,
deficit and national debt,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The government is addicted to spending. The only hope is for our rating to be cut to the point that we can't borrow, only then will the government do anything besides push it off to the next administration or next congress...

Only bad thing is the idiot in the white house seems to believe that tax increases are the answer... moron doesn't realize that tax increase only drive people to leave the country to operate under the table.

Grampa Moses of MA 3:52PM April 18, 2011

If you are a rich American who wants to keep that wealth and status...I'd be moving my money and residence to Brazil for the next 20-30 years. They are the closest to USA lifestyle that is stable and more or less self-sufficient against world economy. Nice no extradition policy too for when USA tries to force US citizens and money home in last economic gasp.

Not entirely sure that you won't need to drop US citizenship though to evade all the various nations seeking payment on US debts. If you keep your wealth you will probably be able to BUY a US Visa whenever you feel like visiting.

Unfortunately every other Western style government or friendly dictatorship is in some way tied to US fortunes and has some outstanding issues of its own. The EU will definitely collapse as will most Commonwealth countries.

You would think Canada the sole exception but I assume it will experience a US illegal invasion to shame the Mexican flow into US. I actually assume shooting ROE before the Canadian forces collapse. Even 1-2 million US refugees into Canada economy would totally overwhelm its economy due to dilution of its small population and job market.

Selfish of TX 3:47PM April 18, 2011

Republicans just do not understand.

Grassroots Democrats view an economic crash as an economic and political equalizer for the common citizen -- a peaceful and irresistable revolutionary force in reshape American society -- a Good and desirable event.

Obama is on track to deliver the economic equality for which Democrats elected him. The majority poor do NOT feel that an economic crash will hurt them any more than the widening economic gap already has.

In the meantime there is NO reason not to throw a futuristic party. Even Republicans will admit that cheap new Green energy might be good thing to have locally when rebuilding new economy after the USA nationalizes all major foreign investments. Renewable and industry building makes sense when you realize physical plants cannot be repossessed. The USA will lose all foreign industrial plans bu keep any new stuff built in USA.

Illegals would also benefit as a raw new economy would put the emphasis back on work ethic rather than political status.

Observer of TX 3:29PM April 18, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos