Japan's Nuclear Crisis Reignites Safety Debate

Reader Comments

Back to article

First, take a deep breath and remember, the experiment has already been done regarding fallout. Hiroshima and Nagasaki - now thriving cities - blew more nuclear dust and ash into the upper atmosphere than the steaming power plant fizzle will . During the following decades there was no increase in cancer rates on the West Coast.

Furthermore, in the Pacific, more than 125 nuclear bombs and devices were exploded, under the sea and above ground, by the United States, England and France between 1945 and 1962 (That's how that whole Godzilla thing got started - Finally being dissolved in Tokyo Bay by Dr, Sarazowa's "oxygen destoyer"...sorry, I couldn't resist) . Anyway, entire fleets of ships were sunk - all were full of fuel oil and other chemicals as well - but I suppose that's a separate eco-worry. Anyway, all that radiation was released fairly close to Hawaii - no ill effects were noted in the "Aloha State".

France detonated more than 40 devices in the Sahara desert from 1956 through 1962.

At Novaya Zemlya, Russia preformed over 50 underwater and atmospheric nuclear tests between 1955 and 1963. Among these were the largest nuclear blasts on record.

Between 1951 and 1962 approximately 100, "above ground", nuclear bombs were detonated in the Nevada desert. These "tests" were conducted approximately 65 miles from Las Vegas and less than 100 miles, "up wind", of St. George Utah.

Thousands of U.S. soldiers were exposed to some of these blasts - often close enough to burn their skin. Many times, after the blast, these men were ordered to immediately march through "ground zero" - the center of the blast zone. The shock wave and hot wind could be felt on the streets of Las Vegas. The incidence of various cancers were greatly increased in the area - and are still slightly increased. The soldiers exposed to the radiation suffered cancer rates nearly double those of the general population.

That said, it must be stressed that these "explosive" exposures were at ranges of under 100 miles and sometimes as close as five miles. The low level radioactive release from Japanese power plants it relatively free of particulates and is released at comparatively low altitudes - nearly 6000 miles away - not 60 miles.

At this juncture it's important to note that windmills, solar panels or fairy-dust are not going to do the job. We need to utilize everything; coal, shale, natural gas, nuclear, hydroelectric, oil, hydrogen and "green energy.

From 1970 to present wind energy has claimed the lives of 35 American workers, and caused dozens of wild fires - Nuclear energy, none. Now consider that nuclear produces 17% of our energy needs - wind <2%. Also, each year thousands die from electricity, fire, natural gas, coal mine and dam disasters.

We haven't built a nuclear plant since 1966 - I don't know about you, but I'm thinkin' we've moved ahead technologically (though not musically) since The Temptations released, "Ain't Too Proud To Beg".

Time is running out.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 7:01PM March 21, 2011

Thats dumb, first of all instead of a 50 mile radius it should be more like a 100 mile radius, this fact comes from the incident that happened in Trinoble. Second, if nuclear power is such a threat why is it that for over 50 years we've continued to use and further our technology in this program? should we learn from this mistake, as we did with all the other accidents? Yes of course but the risk has always remained.

tony of AZ 5:28PM March 21, 2011

1) because they are brittle after 40 years of intense neutron radiations

2) because they have not 2 separate circuits of steam (radioactive/non radioactive)

3) so many parts are obsolete and kaput after 40 years

4) even the conception is obsolete after 40 years

5) the engineers that thought the reactor are mostly dead

6) So many modifications has been made in 40 years that no scheme is complete

7) the geeks that control the reactor don't know why it work after 40 years

8) the private company will make profit, but it's difficult with so little power

9) so the private company (tesco) cheat with the security verifications

10) would you try to use an IBM 1970 unix computer with Snow Leopard 2011?

Jean-Francois Morf, Charrat, Switzerland 4:29PM March 21, 2011

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to article

Photo Galleries

Storms, Wildfires Tear Across U.S.

Heavy rain, high winds and fire continue to plague regions throughout the country.

advertisement

Latest Videos