NPR Boardmembers and Fundraisers Give Overwhelmingly to Democrats

Of nearly $2.2 million in political contributions, most goes to the left

March 15, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (14)

The ongoing budget crisis and accusations of liberal bias have fueled renewed calls by conservative politicians for an end to NPR's public funding. The public broadcaster's opponents gained further ammunition last week when conservative activist James O'Keefe released a hidden-camera video of NPR Foundation President Ron Schiller apparently saying that NPR might be better off without federal funding and seeming to make disparaging remarks about the Tea Party movement. Subsequent independent analysis of the raw footage showed that Schiller's remarks were taken out of context and were not as damning as originally presented. Nevertheless Schiller, who had the previous week already announced plans to leave NPR for another job, departed immediately and issued an apology saying this statements were "counter to NPR's values." The NPR board also asked president and CEO Vivian Schiller (no relation to Ron Schiller) to step down.

Conservatives have long complained that the public broadcaster has a liberal bias, a charge NPR's defenders have denied. In at least one regard, however, NPR's board and fundraisers have, as a whole, shown a marked lean to the left in recent years: political contributions. A review of campaign finance data found that NPR board members' campaign contributions have sharply favored Democrats. Since 2004, members of the boards of NPR and the NPR Foundation, the public broadcaster's fundraising arm, have contributed nearly $2.2 million to federal candidates, parties, and PACs, of which $1.95 million, or 89 percent, has gone to Democratic candidates and liberal-leaning political action committees. [See where members of Congress get their campaign contributions.]

Officers and trustees of the NPR Foundation, which has no control over the organization's programming, have given substantially to national political campaigns in recent years. According to data from the Center for Responsive Politics, this group's members (as listed on NPR's most recent available annual report, from fiscal year 2008) have given almost $2.1 million to political campaigns in the last eight years. Fully 89 percent of this giving was to Democrats and progressive organizations. These figures include all federal contributions since the 2004 election cycle, the first in which "soft money" contributions were banned. "Soft money" refers to money given to a party for non-campaign activities, which until being banned in 2002 were unlimited and largely unregulated.

A majority of contributions from members of NPR's Board of Directors have likewise gone to Democrats. This board comprises 10 NPR station managers, the NPR president, the NPR Foundation president, and five prominent members of the public, selected by the board and confirmed by member stations. Political contributions by these station managers have been virtually nonexistent, and there are also no recorded political contributions from either Ron Schiller or Vivian Schiller. Of the five public board members, however, giving has been far more Democratic than Republican, with nearly 95 percent of the group's $106,000 in contributions going to Democrats or progressive committees. Three of these members have given exclusively to Democrats since the start of 2003, though in amounts less than $5,000 each. One member, Carol Cartwright, has given $4,100 to Republicans and $700 to Democrats. But the biggest giver, John A. Herrmann, Jr., has given $82,500 to candidates and committees since 2003, 98 percent of it to Democrats. [See editorial cartoons about the Democratic Party.]

NPR spokeswoman Anna Christopher says political giving does not impact NPR's news coverage. She points out that the foundation is primarily responsible for fundraising and is not involved in programming, and that NPR's board "is not involved in day to day [operations]" and does not make recommendations about news coverage. "Past political contributions of members of a foundation or board--I would hesitate drawing a line between that and our news coverage," she adds.

The tendency toward Democratic giving does not extend across all areas of public broadcasting. For example, five of the six members of the Board of Directors of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides funding to local public radio and television across the country, were appointed by President George W. Bush. The board members' cumulative giving since 2003 totals over $100,000, nearly three-quarters of which has gone to Republicans.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
NPR,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Ron Schiller and Betsy Liley groveling to what they thought were two Hamas front men, Schiller cramming food into his mouth as fast as he could between hate raps designed to flatter anti-semitic Islamic lunatics, Liley later caught on tape doing the dance of assurance with the Jihadists that these donations can be anonymous, you bet they can be anonymous, it was not "leftist leanings" that outraged the YouTube viewers, it was the reflection of a corporate culture rife with an appalling lack of ethics. It was a complete and total devastation of NPR's reporting crediblity. And, since NPR is so closely associated with Washington, D.C. and everything that implies, the investigative report constituted a shocking indictment of the attitude of the Washington puppet masters. My opinion.

Ed Shaw of NY 10:42PM April 18, 2011

I hear all the time now that Nixon would be considered a liberal by todays standards. So that must mean that what was once considered conservative, like the idea that a womens place is at home raising the kids, isn't really claimed as one of their values today and would have to go on tv and publicly apologize for saying so after being caught on tape. Everyone acts as though values and ideas held on ether side haven't changed. They are constantly in flux. You may think that you stand on firm ground and then 8.9 quake hits and suddenly slavery is over, women can vote, schools are intergated, and its ok to run for president after being married three times. To me NPR is just information, which is knowledge and knowledge is power. And I prefer to get my power commercial free.

jeff of IA 11:57PM March 17, 2011

When NPR and PBS were first started, I remember there were only three broadcast networks, so educational, cultural or scientific programming was pretty much not an option. In today's world of 24/7 cable programming, Internet TV, and new media with CSPAN, Discovery, History, Animal Planet, Biography, ESPN, Food Network, Science Channel, etc. available, maybe it's time for PBS and NPR to enter the real world and accept that times have changed. When the March of Dimes first started, polio was the problem of the day, now that polio is no longer the major disease it was in the pre-1950's, the board had an option to go out of business or refocus on new issues. MoD went to work on preventing birth defects, a change in their original mission because the times changed. I think NPR and PBS need to take that approach and accept that federal funding isn't necessary. If it wants to maintain its nonprofit status and be a source of objective news. that's fine. They can compete with ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, Fox, CNN, Al Jazeera, BBC, AP, Reuters, AFP, Christian Science Monitor and every other news media outfit on a level playing field.

As to whether the culture at NPR with so many supporting Democrats and Progressive causes is left leaning, it would be hard to argue that personal preferences wouldn't somehow shape the culture, orientation and the way news is passed on to its audience. If NPR wants to be left leaning, make no apologies and just be known as a good source of left leaning news and be done with it.

VWH of IL 12:39PM March 17, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos