Government Shutdown Looms as Federal Funding Negotiations Stall

The House, Senate, and White House will have little time to negotiate a compromise to keep the government open

February 22, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Current funding for the federal government will run out in less than two weeks. Yet the two parties are nowhere near a consensus on how to keep it funded for the rest of the year and beyond. Last week, President Obama released his budget for fiscal year 2012, and Republicans blasted it for being too timid and for failing to take up entitlement reform. The complex and constantly changing situation has left political observers and congressional insiders unsure how this will all turn out. "This is as complex a fiscal knot as we've seen in quite some time," says Bill Galston, a former domestic policy adviser for President Clinton and current governance expert with the Brookings Institution.

[See a slide show of 10 budget and spending fights looming for Obama and the GOP.]

Adding to the stress is the timetable. Early Saturday morning, the Republican-controlled House passed a funding bill, or continuing resolution, which would keep the government open for the remainder of fiscal year 2011, which runs through the end of September. The House bill would immediately cut about $60 billion from the government's nondefense, discretionary budget. Congress is in recess this week, so the Democrat-controlled Senate will only have a few days to negotiate a compromise version of the funding bill. With so little time to work out a huge compromise, lawmakers will likely try to pass a smaller stop-gap measure which will keep the government running while negotiations continue.

[See a roundup of editorial cartoons about the budget and the deficit.]

But House Speaker John Boehner threw cold water on that idea last Friday. "I am not going to move any kind of short-term [continuing resolution] at current levels," he said. His hard line may be an attempt to keep the often rebellious Republican caucus in line, including new members who were supported by the Tea Party and were elected on platforms of slashing government spending. "They're asking, 'How can I look my constituents in the eye and say that I voted to keep spending at this bloated level?'" says one Republican House aide.

Already, both parties are positioning the other to take the blame if a shutdown happens. "I am disappointed that Speaker Boehner doesn't believe he has the votes to avoid a government shutdown unless his members get their way on all of their demands," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said in a statement. Republicans say it's Democrats who are being unreasonable. "You know, any time that we propose a spending cut, it seems that [Democratic Sens.] Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin, Harry Reid, and others scream, 'shutdown,'" House Majority Leader Eric Cantor said on last week.

The skirmishes over the president's 2012 budget have already begun, as well. Obama's budget makes some long-term cuts and revenue increases, but critics blasted it. Republicans, slamming the president for a "failure to lead," have said that they'll deal with entitlements such as Social Security and Medicare when they unveil their 2012 budget in the spring. And a bipartisan group of senators has been working on legislation based on the recommendations from the president's deficit commission. Such a package could be the basis of a compromise, but they are months away from a firm proposal. [See photos of the Obamas behind the scenes.]

Still, lawmakers have been known to defy the odds, as they did with the tax deal passed last year. But this could be the trickiest pickle yet for Obama and the GOP to work their way through.

Tags:
Richard Durbin,
Harry Reid,
deficit and national debt,
John Boehner,
Congress,
Eric Cantor,
democratic party,
Chuck Schumer,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Yes, I have a home and a job, but my thing is you want to have all these cuts here and claim we don't have any money then why in the world are you sending millions of dollars to Japan??? come on take care of us first. Once we can get things straight here then we can help other countries... smh...

js of VA 8:54PM April 06, 2011

The bottom line is....taxes have to go up. The question is, who will pay them? That is what needs to be sorted out. Yes, steps need to be made to adjust spending, but that is not the short-term or long-term solution. Tax rates are at a low (look at some of the most prosperous times in American history, especially that of the most affluent and compare). When CEO's, bankers, and comparable business leaders are making nearly 100X what the average American is able to bring home, something is wrong. Again, to prove this, look at some of the most prosperous times in America and compare the compensation of such professions and business leaders to that of the other workers in a given organization. You will find that the gap was much smaller, and better reflected the production of its employees. When that is the case, there are more people with more money to spend (prosperous times).

When you bring home a ridiculous income each year, you have a rough time spending it, so you save and the money doesn't go back into lubricating the economy. You could argue that the significant residual income is invested and therefore does lubricate the economy, but that only works if there is someone on the other side of the investment to provide the return (bleed a turnip comes to mind). No smart business person is going to invest in something and hire and pay employees, if the business person is not going to make money.

Nobody likes the Government, until they realize how important it is. The government provides for the needs of the people...infrastructure, justice systems, DEFENSE.......not to mention social welfare needs. Lets not forget the regulatory roles that the government plays. Sure, regulation is a bad word. Until it protects your freedoms. Serfdom and slavery have many different forms and economic means is ALWAYS the driving factor! The bottom line is, people are struggling. Take a look around! People are losing jobs and health care, and then when they get health care they are denied payment for treatment of pre-existing conditions (I alone know 2 people in that boat). The people most willing (they don't really have a choice) to contribute to the economy are having their legs cut. Even if business take up to hiring, at what rates? I will tell you, as low as possible, to ensure profitability.

Sure, cut, cut, cut......and let the most powerful and wealthy in the Country run things (i.e. wealthy individuals and groups, Corporations, Churches, and other large organizations). The government exist to govern, laws are made to protect all people's rights. Not just those with the most money.

In conclusion, I hope that all the people screaming cut, cut, cut are prepared to fin for themselves and their children. May you keep your jobs, and earn a wage to provide for the future of your children.

Long live Capitalism (I mean the kind that promotes healthy and fair competition, not nepotism and serfdom). Who owns your news station?

Devin of IN 10:24PM March 08, 2011

the government needs to stop the lies about every thing. The only thing that they have to make money off is their Scandals. They are not producing anything at home that up lifts the people. So the home based is crumbling. Until they stop repeating the solutions of the past (that do not work btw) and listen to the People once and for all and accept we are intelligent by our designs and have innovations that will revolutionize all life. Many of know how to make this path easier for ourselves by becoming the Peaceful Inhabitants of this country and the planet and Declare WORLD PEACE.

...Aeon-pi of NM 1:09PM February 26, 2011

Photo Galleries

Before and After the Joplin Tornado

A look at Joplin one year after the deadly tornado.

advertisement

Latest Video