Clinton: Violence in Libya 'Completely Unacceptable'

February 22, 2011 RSS Feed Print

WASHINGTON— The Obama administration on Tuesday condemned "appalling" violence in Libya, where security forces are unleashing a bloody crackdown on protesters demanding the ouster of longtime leader Moammar Gadhafi.

"This violence is completely unacceptable," Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said.

But as it sought to safely extricate U.S. diplomats and other Americans from the violence spreading around Libya, Washington stopped short of criticizing Gadhafi personally or demanding that he step down.

[Take the U.S. News Poll: Is Obama Handling Libya the Right Way?]

The Obama administration did not outline any specific steps to coerce or punish the Libyan regime, with which the U.S. has built a wary partnership after years of branding Gadhafi a terrorist sponsor.

U.S. officials renewed calls for Gadhafi's government to talk with opponents, and cast the political unrest there as part of a regional uprising against political and economic stagnation that must be addressed by the Arab governments of the Middle East and North Africa.

Gadhafi delivered a defiant speech on national television in which he vowed not to step down and die a martyr's death fighting those rebelling against his more than four-decade regime.

Libya teetered on the brink of what some fear will explode into a full-blown civil war, and administration officials repeatedly invoked their primary concern of ensuring the safety U.S. citizens there.

"We believe that the government of Libya bears responsibility for what is occurring and must take actions to end the violence," Clinton told reporters at the State Department.

[See 15 major post-Cold War uprisings.]

"As always, the safety and well-being of Americans has to be our highest priority. We are in touch with many Libyan officials directly and indirectly and with other governments in the region to try to influence what is going on inside Libya."

State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said U.S. officials have been assured by Libyan authorities that the embassy workers and families will be able to leave safely and said the United States expected those pledges to be honored.

"They've pledged to support us in our evacuation, and we hope that cooperation will be forthcoming," he said.

Crowley said the department was trying to get 35 non-essential staff and family members of personnel at the U.S. embassy in Libya out of the country. They were ordered to leave on Monday but have not yet been able to leave, he said. In addition, there are several thousand dual U.S.-Libyan nationals and about 600 U.S. citizens now believed to be in Libya.

Asked about Gadhafi's fiery televised speech in which he repeatedly referred to his regime standing up to the United States during the Reagan administration and the 1986 U.S. airstrikes against Libyan targets, including his home, Crowley demurred.

"We want to see the bloodshed stopped," he said. "We want to see the government engage its citizens, rather than attack its citizens."

"This is ultimately and fundamentally an issue between the Libyan government, its leader, and the Libyan people," Crowley said. "They, like others, are standing up and demanding a greater say in the events of their country. We have grave concerns about the Libyan response to these protesters. We continue to be guided by our fundamental principles. We don't want to see any further violence."

Earlier, White House spokesman Jay Carney called on Gadhafi's regime to respect the universal rights of its citizens and allow peaceful protests to take place. Echoing earlier White House statements about anti-government protests in Egypt, he said the future of Libya needs to be decided by the Libyan people.

Tags:
John Kerry,
Libya,
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen,
Hillary Clinton,
Congress

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Was she listening to herself speak? Didn't we just have a major political protest in this country during the health insurance legislation fiasco? Didn't the Democrats trash the Tea Party people who were also demanding "more open, more accountable, and more responsive government?" Did the US government "engage peacefully and positively in addressing their demands and to work to respond to them?" And didn't "the gap between people and governments . . . only grow, and instability " only deepen? Didn't the feds act against Arizona in its lawful attempts to protect their citizens? And where was she when the feds not only fired on Americans - they burned men, women, and children alive at Waco? And what are Democratic legislators doing in several states right now? Refusing to engage. . . The difference between Ghadafi's gov and DC is only in degree.

And did you know we're giving foreign aid to SOMALIA, while they're hijacking and killing Americans?

Maggie Church of TX 10:42PM February 23, 2011

The Obama Administration is fumbling America's response to the Middle East uprisings and revolution. Worse, we have managed to alienate the protestors, we have failed to assure our allies in the region as we have failed to draw a distinction between reformable governments like Bahrain and despotic dictators like Muammar al-Gaddafi.

All this may seem explicable if this were 3 a.m. in the morning, but now it's three weeks later, and the Obama Administration still seems flat-footed. Hillary Clinton's statement, only partially reprinted above, doesn't even mention Col. Gadaffi even though it was he alone who ordered his military to turn and slaughter his own people. The rest of the world must be watching and wondering about America and our multi-faceted tin-eared president.

When Joe Biden said that Hosni Mubarak wasn't a dictator, I didn't blink. When Robert Gibbs said that our own ambassador to Egypt, Mr. Wisner "don't represent the views of the administration," I was only somewhat concerned. Then when the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said that the Muslim Brotherhood had "eschewed violence" (only to be contradicted by the FBI director), I got worried. Now, with Hillary's statement, on top of the many pontifications by the president himself, the US looks confused.

We started off on the wrong foot in the Middle East with Obama's "Apology Tour," and made our position worse by our ineptness during the June, 2009 uprising in Iran--when it took President Obama eight days to say anything. Now, we still don't know what we are doing.

I long for the days of Sec. of State Rice and the Bush "Freedom Agenda." It wasn't that long ago that the US and the world knew where we stood on the question of freedom, liberty, and justice for all.

Sherlock Holmes of NH 12:42PM February 23, 2011

HAS THE VOICE OF FREEDOM IN THE WORLD GONE SILENT IN THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION?

It is totally astonishing that Obama is 'seeking approval from Libya to remove Americans from the country'! WHEN DID WE START GETTING APPROVAL FROM A TYRANT TO SAVE THE LIVES OF PEOPLE – OUR OWN PEOPLE??

As each day goes by, Obama manages to set new depth records of a FAILED PRESIDENCY!

PappyHappy of CA 7:42AM February 23, 2011

Photo Galleries

All the World's a Carnival

See spectacular images from carnival celebrations.

advertisement

Latest Video