Pentagon Chiefs: Don't Cut Defense Too Deeply

February 16, 2011 RSS Feed Print

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon's top civilian and military leaders implored Congress on Wednesday not to cut too deeply into military spending, plunging into a heated political debate over how to curtail defense costs without imperiling U.S. strategic interests at a time the military is fighting two wars. [Read more about President Obama's 2012 budget proposal.]

"We shrink from our global security responsibilities at our peril," Defense Secretary Robert Gates told the House Armed Services Committee. "Retrenchment brought about by short-sighted cuts could well lead to costlier and more tragic consequences later -- indeed as they always have in the past."

Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are trying to strike a balance between constraining future defense budgets as part of a government-wide effort to reduce budget deficits and preserving U.S. military power. One of the more controversial elements of the administration' proposed 2012 budget is a plan to reduce the size of the Army and Marine Corps starting in 2015. [See photos of U.S. troops in Afghanistan.]

Gates said the Pentagon is asking for $553 billion for the budget year that begins Oct. 1, plus $118 billion in war costs. He also is asserting that the Pentagon will face a crisis if the Congress does not pass a new defense budget for the current year or passes one with significantly reduced funding. So far this year the Pentagon has been required to operate on last year's budget. He said the Pentagon can get by with as little as $540 billion this year. [Read more about national security and the military.]

 

Tags:
Robert Gates,
Mike Mullen,
deficit and national debt,
Barack Obama,
national security terrorism and the military,
Associated Press

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The Republican dominated House did a wise thing by dropping the two-engined plane that the Defense Department didn't want. For starters, Gates, can drop contracts on Halliburton and Xe that caused harm to GIs in Iraq and countless Iraqis, and even killed some people. They can cut troops in such unnecessary area as Germany, Japan, and posts in other places in Europe and even in the United States where troops aren't needed. With the START Treaty ratified, we can cut missle defense in Eastern Europe. Congress needs to show some guts by dropping ouside contractors and use in-house people throughout the federal government as much as possible. It's much cheaper and you can control the costs.

Jack Golding of KS 1:56PM February 17, 2011

If we are supposed to be the global watch dog and keep the world in line we are doing a poor job. Maybe we should stop trying and spend the money on making ourselves more economically competitive. We spend almost as much on the defence budget as the rest of the world combined, but we have been in combat for years in conflicts we can't win.

We heard all the gloom and doom stories after the base closings. The net result was less real estate owned by the DoD.

Let's get real--a giant military budget has not shortened the conflicts in either Iraq or Afghanistan.

Mike of WA 12:58PM February 17, 2011

I would just like to THANK Ralph of AZ for FINALLY puting punctuation marks in his PITHY comments. While I might NOT agree with MOST of what he says, it is now MUCH easier to READ & UNDRESTAND what he's TRYING to say. THANK YOU RALPH ...........

scoobydoo of MA 11:45AM February 17, 2011

Photo Galleries

Before and After the Joplin Tornado

A look at Joplin one year after the deadly tornado.

advertisement

Latest Video