Obama Is Emphasizing Ronald Reagan-like Optimism

Like Reagan, the president wants Americans to feel good about themselves and about their country's future

February 3, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (7)

On Feb. 6, 1911, a son was born to Jack and Nelle Reagan in the small town of Tampico, Ill. The parents called their newborn "Ronald," but his father affectionately nicknamed him "Dutch" because he said the infant looked like "a fat Dutchman." Not the most flattering description by Dad, but it was given with affection, a sense of humor, and a down-to-earth candor. These qualities reflected the way Ronald Reagan was raised. [See photos from Ronald Reagan's life.]

His was an average middle-class household where he had no special advantages. No family fortune. No insider connections. No shortcuts. But through hard work, seizing the opportunities at hand, and some luck, "Dutch" would rise from his relatively humble beginnings to achieve remarkable success, first as an actor in Hollywood and then in politics as governor of California, then as a leader of America's conservative movement, and for eight years starting in January 1981, as president of the United States.

As the nation prepares to mark the 100th anniversary of his birth, the question arises: Why has Ronald Reagan retained a hold on the popular imagination? Polls of historians often rate him in the top tier of presidents, and everyday Americans tend to agree.

Of course, Reagan did have some failures. His policies allowed the deficit to grow exponentially, and he seemed insensitive at times to the poor and others who relied on Washington for help. And he was more than a bit disengaged from the details of governing and sometimes delegated too much authority to his aides, which led to the Iran-Contra arms-for-hostages scandal.

But most Americans felt that the pluses outweighed the minuses. One of Reagan's strong points is that he never forgot his roots in Middle America. He seemed to intuitively understand what everyday people valued and what they wanted from their leaders. On election night in 1980, as the early returns made clear that he had won a smashing victory over Democratic incumbent Jimmy Carter, Reagan was asked what Americans saw in him, and he replied, "Would you laugh if I told you that I think, maybe, they see themselves, and that I'm one of them? I've never been able to detach myself or think that I, somehow, am apart from them."

Reagan had some special insights into leadership that have stood the test of time. "The job of the president is not to build consensus in Washington, but to build consensus in America, and then Washington will follow," says Ken Duberstein, Reagan's last White House chief of staff.

Other presidents have lost sight of this Reagan principle, including Barack Obama, who critics say has tried too often to make deals in Washington but hasn't paid enough attention to generating support outside the beltway. Obama may be learning the error of his ways, because he has started a campaign of outreach to everyday citizens by traveling outside D.C. and meeting more frequently with adversaries in Congress, just as Reagan did three decades ago.

Obama also is emphasizing the Reaganesque theme of optimism. His goal, similar to Reagan's, is to make Americans feel good about themselves, about their ability to control their fate, and about the country's future. This was evident in Obama's State of the Union address when he said, "The future is ours to win. But to get there, we can't just stand still. As Robert Kennedy told us, 'The future is not a gift. It is an achievement.' ...From the earliest days of our founding, America has been the story of ordinary people who dare to dream. That's how we win the future." [See Obama's 5 best speeches of all time.]

Another Reagan approach was to set a clear direction for the country, such as standing up to communism, slowing the growth of government, and cutting taxes. He made compromises, but there was no doubt where he was headed, and Americans liked that. Historians say this is an area, clarity of direction, where Obama could show substantial improvement.

Finally, Reagan was a believer in American exceptionalism, the notion that the United States is a "shining city upon a hill," serving as a global model in its values of liberty and the protection of individual rights, its commitment to democracy, and its use of capitalism as the engine of prosperity. Overall, Reagan was able to bolster the country's faith in itself during some tough times. And that might have been his greatest contribution of all.

Tags:
State of the Union,
Robert Kennedy,
Barack Obama,
Ronald Reagan,
Jimmy Carter

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The optimism that emanated when president Reagan spoke to the public was choreographed as well as any of the scenes in his movies. That was part of his charisma and he played the part well. Acting is a part of being a world leader but there comes a time when all statesmen need to know when to lead the country in the right direction, hold subordinates and himself accountable and be knowledgeable enough to know how to steer the country out of harms way.

I feel President Reagan's staff lead him down the wrong path several times and he wasn't experienced enough to see it, and it put the country into financial ruin!

We are experiencing the after shock of those choices. Several Presidents were hoodwinked into several bad trade agreements that seemed good at the time but our trading partners have turned out to be scoundrels and now we lack the will or the ability to drive a hard bargain and to level the playing field in the international trade arena.

Our trading partners are ruthless, potentates that know they will be there to "dictate" trade policy long after our sitting president is long gone!

We need a tough trade policy that doesn't get dissolved every time our administration changes!

The present trade policy is custom made for big business to operate in with no liability to this country and foreign companies to cheat. They receive unfair tax breaks and they can move money, work and operations off shore at will. This is fine BUT the customers here have a hard time buying foreign made products from U. S. companies, not for the lack of want, but for the lack of the job that was moved off shore to generate the big profits. No job, no income, no market here. Is that so hard to understand?

Foreign countries are buying U. S. made products BUT they are made overseas! We are buying foreign products here that USED to be made HERE and from a foreign company. No problem until you see the huge trade imbalance, high unemployment, bankrupt country, states, counties, cities, and citizens!

The national debt keeps rising, the local businesses go out of business, the local governments go broke and the citizens homes are foreclosed on for lack of a job and income.

The bumper sticker that says "out of a job? Keep buying foreign says it all and even someone with an M.B.A., driving a foreign car SHOULD be able to make THAT connection, but I see to many of them, that don't make the connection and are bewildered when they get a pink slip and head for the UNemployment line!

If you notice, foreigners buy what they build and that perpetuates there economy and jobs. Americans buy ,the most TRENDY thing as dictated by friends, media saturated commercials and biased magazines and the economy and country suffer for it! Made in America is looked down upon even when the quality and price are superior to the foreign brands and that is just ignorant on our part! We make good products and our technology is second to none. What other country has walked on the moon?

Lee Hansen of MI 9:25PM February 09, 2011

"Finally, Reagan was a believer in American exceptionalism, the notion that the United States is a "shining city upon a hill," serving as a global model in its values of liberty and the protection of individual rights, its commitment to democracy, and its use of capitalism as the engine of prosperity".

This last piece to the article exemplifies and sums’ it up quite well. But it is so opposite of what Obama is. He has apologized for this country to show it as a "dull slum in a gully", with limited values of liberty, only to protect the rights of those that support his ideology, committed to socialism and government as the engine to prosperity.

Ronald Reagan was a servant to the people and not its ruler. He was not a carrier politician and did not need the money. Some things that is so foreign to the current administration.

Steve of TX 12:34PM February 04, 2011

I thought Ronald Reagan was the devil?

Dan of NH 10:33AM February 04, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos