Colin Powell: Cut Military Spending to Reduce Deficit

January 24, 2011 RSS Feed Print

By Nina Mandell
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

As Republicans ratchet up calls to cut arts programs, former Sec. of State Colin Powell says the real solution to reduce the budget deficit is to cut military spending.

Powell, a retired four-star general who served in the Bush administration, made the comment on CNN's "State of the Union" show on Sunday.

"When the Cold War ended 20 years ago, when I was chairman and [Dick] Cheney was Secretary of Defense, we cut the defense budget by 25 percent. And we reduced the force by 500,000 active duty soldiers, so it can be done. Now, how fast you can do it and what you have to cut out remains to be seen, but I don't think the defense budget can be made sacrosanct and it can't be touched," he said. [Read more about national security, terrorism, and the military.]

In their Pledge to America during the midterm elections, Republicans pledged to cut $100 billion from the budget in an effort to control spending, but most top leaders want to leave Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid and military and veteran spending untouched.

While Tea Party members have said nothing is off limits to cut -- including defense, many top Republicans have suggested yanking money from a variety of domestic programs, including NPR, the National Endowment for the Arts and Amtrak, as possible answers to the country's financial woes.

"Nice political chatter, but that doesn't do it," Powell said.

He also slammed Republican leaders for playing politics with the budget, without offering what he said were real solutions.

"Don't tell me you're going to freeze to a level," he said. "That usually is a very inefficient way of doing it. Tell me what you're going to cut, and nobody up there yet is being very, very candid about what they are going to cut to fix this problem." [Read more about the deficit and national debt.]

Powell's comments came shortly after Tea Party leaders reiterated their willingness to cut the defense budget. Republican leader Eric Cantor also has recently expressed that he would be willing to support defense cuts.

Powell, who famously crossed the line to endorse Obama in 2008, said he isn't yet prepared to back any candidate in the 2012 presidential election, despite his views on the budget seeming to line up with Democrats' arguments.

"I'm not committed to Barack Obama. I'm not committed to a Republican candidate," the moderate Republican said. "I am not committed to any candidate until I see all the candidates and finally see who the two candidates are who are going for this position.

"Right now I do not see on the Republican side any one individual who I think is going to emerge at the top of the pile."

Tags:
New York Daily News,
deficit and national debt,
Colin Powell,
Medicaid,
Eric Cantor,
Cold War,
Medicare,
democratic party,
Barack Obama,
national security terrorism and the military,
social security,
republican party,
Tea Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Fact is US spends more than the next 16 countries combined on defense and nearly 3times what China does. The argument that cutting defense will reduce our influence in the world begs the question. How much influence will we have as a broke nation increasingly unable to pay all of it's commitments.

Lew hendler of PA 6:51AM August 11, 2011

It is most unfortunate that Bush torpedoed Colin Powell. The Country would have fared much better with Powell as President than Bush.... needless to say what the results were with Bush in office. Powell is an intelligent no-nonsense individual who would have made a great leader, even better than Obama. He would not have needed banners proclaiming "Mission Accomplished", or done some stupid thing like wearing a flight jacket just to look like one of the boys. Bush was a total phoney from day one. That being said, we now have to get after our representatives to stay the hell away from the military lobbyists in Washington. When we watch the military channel, and see how much money is spent just for one part of the military, such as "Snipers", one can see all that is spent just to equip an individual to do such a job. From special long range guns, to camouflage, to all kinds of special equipment such as night vision goggles, food rations etc..etc... Multiply that by thousands, and you have mega-millions of our tax dollars going to "defense manufacturers", who, by the way, charge top price for something as simple as a compass!!!! Just imagine what the cost is for ONE bullet that is used in the long-range 50 cal sniper gun!! The defense industry are running over themselves to come out with more and newer weapons that will likely be obsolete before they are ever used, which is where our money goes.... and the production just keeps coming like there is no tomorrow!! This has to stop. Sure, we need weapons for Defense, but who are we defending now?? All I see is that we are defending other countries!! Let them defend themselves!! If they ask for help, fine, if we can afford it. We MUST put our own house in order if we want to be the leader of the world. If we don't, I would highly suggest that they teach Chinese & the Indian languages in our schools, because that is who will be the leaders of the world if we do nothing!!

Jerry of ME 2:57AM April 27, 2011

ha

Amos Boshart of OR 2:33AM March 29, 2011

Photo Galleries

Before and After the Joplin Tornado

A look at Joplin one year after the deadly tornado.

advertisement

Latest Video