Giffords Shooting in Arizona Spurs Gun Law Debate

Some are calling for stricter gun control laws

January 18, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (17)

The tragic shooting in Arizona, which left six people dead and Rep. Gabrielle Giffords seriously wounded, immediately swept aside business as usual for Congress, possibly altering its agenda for the rest of the year. As legislators mourned those who were lost, they also mulled how to move forward in a very new political climate. [See photos from the Arizona shooting.]

Although the House had been scheduled to debate a healthcare repeal last week, that vote and all other major votes were postponed. Instead, lawmakers took time to speak out about the tragedy, attend security briefings with the Capitol Police, and pass a measure condemning the act and honoring those who had fallen. Congress will return to its agenda this week, but it may decide to move forward with a moderated tone.It isn't clear what consequences, if any, the event will have for Congress. But, as in past shooting incidents, the tragedy in Tucson has sparked a debate on America's gun control laws, both at the state and national levels, although it doesn't appear that the stage is set for any sort of large change.

According to police, accused shooter Jared Loughner was able to fire more than 30 rounds before stopping to reload, when bystanders tackled him. The incident has prompted some lawmakers to call for banning high-capacity gun magazines. The 1994 assault weapons ban outlawed such clips, but Congress allowed the law to expire in 2004. "Running out of bullets is kind of a critical point where the shooting stops," says Shams Tarek, a spokesman for Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, a New York Democrat and gun control advocate whose own entry into politics was prompted by the shooting death of her husband. McCarthy is calling for a return to the ban. "If there are less rounds in a clip, usually you can expect that there will be a lot less casualties," Tarek said.

It isn't just Democrats who are supporting gun control measures. Rep. Peter King, a New York Republican, has also called for restrictions on guns near public officials. King's proposal would forbid anyone from carrying a gun within 1,000 feet of an elected official. His announcement was made through Mayors Against Illegal Guns, a coalition cofounded by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a Republican-turned-independent who also has advocated for tougher gun control measures. And Richard Lugar, a veteran Republican senator from Indiana, has called for restoring all of the 1994 assault weapons ban. [See which lawmakers get the most from gun rights groups.]

The political climate is hardly hospitable to further restrictions on guns, despite the shooting. Gun control has long been one of the most controversial political topics—one Democrats have largely avoided since the gun control measures of the early 1990s. With Congress divided for the next two years, it will be difficult to pass any controversial legislation. President Obama has shown little willingness to engage on the issue while dealing with other priorities, such as the economy and the federal deficit. And according to a poll by Rasmussen, only 29 percent of Americans believe that strong gun laws would prevent incidents like the Tucson shooting, and a new poll by Zogby showed that only 35 percent of voters felt the shooting should lead to tougher gun laws. [See which lawmakers get the most from gun control groups.]

Still, the gun control lobby is preparing to push for stricter laws. "We think that this horrific tragedy demands that Congress address the weaknesses in our gun laws. We think it ought to occasion a full-scale examination of those weaknesses," says Dennis Henigan, a vice president with the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. "This is a shooting that strikes Congress very close to home."

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Pete King,
Carolyn McCarthy,
gun control and gun rights,
Pat Leahy,
Congress,
Republican Party,
Gabrielle Giffords,
healthcare reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (17)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The issue is not new laws its enforcement of current laws, fact is Laughtner was expelled from college due to mental issues, that were NOT reported to NCIS, if it was he would have not been able to purchase the hangun to comit the crime.

(the law works when they follow the law)

This is a text book case of reactionary thinking.

it seems to me that better enforcement of over 10,000 laws might improve things, over just a bandaid fix.

As a person in NJ, i can say that the Mayor of Newark was on tv the other day and said of the hundreds of shooting that happen a year in my 4 year's in office i have had only 1 law abiding citizen commit the crime.

He later went on to say "i fear not the law abiding citizen of New jersey, but the one who got it illegally from the Iron Pipeline.

John of NJ 3:57PM January 26, 2011

When are we going to grow some **lls and stop kowtowing to the NRA. If this group is using assault weapons to go hunting...then they are NOT hunters but killers. When the second amendment was created, the writters did not have anything even close to assault weapons or high capacity gun magazines. The NRA is buying, bullying and pressuring our weak-kneed politicians into keeping these laws which are detrimental not only to politicians but to all American citizens. Politicians calling for a weapon ban to protect their yellow butts is an insult to all. It's not just their lives in danger, it's more so innocent bystanders who are in danger of the mentally unbalanced. It's time to stand up to the NRA and demand a permanent ban on all assault weapons for the sake of law-enforcement, the innocent who are killed or injured just to keep a few pompos, arrogant richmen happy. Wait until one of them are shot down and then they will hollar---gun ban!

A. Geary of IA 7:21PM January 25, 2011

"Never let a crisis go to waste"! stated a non-mayoral candidate for the City of Chicago. Gun control by its proponents is actually restricting firearm possession by the American public. The anti-gun liberals are fully aware that the Tuscon tragedy is the direct result of the culture of political correctness and "rights" bestowed on those mentally unstable citizens to protect them from public officials who wish to remove them from the public due to safety (the public's as well as the mentally unstable individual).

The fault of this tragedy is not the firearm that was used in the massacre but because the college who kicked out (asked him not to return) this individual failed to report threats to the police (and hence the FBI who approved the purchase of the firearm).

However, it seems that the anti-gun proponents are now using this tragedy to further their own agenda.

DODAVATAR of CA 4:51PM January 25, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos