Palin Has Her Own Rules on Shootings and Politics

Associated Press SHARE

WASHINGTON — With her video accusing critics of "blood libel," Sarah Palin again showed an unprecedented and daring political command of social networking to maintain a high profile in speculation about the Republican Party and the 2012 presidential race.

The former Alaska governor regularly gets nationwide attention with her selective use of Facebook and Twitter, choosing provocative words when others testing the presidential waters prefer a lighter touch.

Some political pros say her tactics, which protect her from mainstream reporters and neutral audiences, are savvy and effective. Others say she will have to change if she hopes to win the crucial Iowa caucus or New Hampshire primary, let alone the 2012 general election. Many agree she's a master at exploiting the campaign possibilities of fast-changing social media. [Read more about the 2012 presidential election.]

Palin was bound to be drawn into the national debate that followed Saturday's shooting rampage in Arizona, which killed six people and gravely wounded Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. Last March, Giffords noted in a TV interview that Palin's political committee had targeted her district, among others, with crosshairs. "There are consequences to that action," Giffords warned.

There is no evidence that the shooting suspect, Jared Loughner, knew of Palin's actions. But Giffords' remarks seemed eerily prophetic, and her husband and friends complained bitterly of the criticisms Republicans had heaped on her in the fall campaign.

[Take the poll: Is Political Rhetoric To Blame for Arizona Shooting?]

Palin issued a brief statement of condolences Saturday, when some news reports erroneously said Giffords was dead. She rebuffed countless media requests for further comment.

On Monday, conservative talk show host Glenn Beck read an e-mail from Palin saying, "Our children will not have peace if politicos just capitalize on this to succeed in portraying anyone as inciting terror and violence."

On Wednesday, Palin posted a video on her Facebook page in which she defended her actions and rebuked the news media and her critics.

"Especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding," she said, "journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn."

The term "blood libel" raised eyebrows. While the phrase "has become part of the English parlance to refer to someone being falsely accused," said Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League, it is "fraught with pain in Jewish history."

The term is associated with centuries-old claims that Jews killed Christian children for rituals. Some Jewish lawmakers felt Palin's comments were especially ill-advised because Giffords is Jewish.

While bloggers speculated on whether Palin knew the term's history, political pros marveled at her continued ability to dive into national debates when, where and how she chooses.

"Nobody understands her base better than she does," said Democratic consultant Erik Smith. He said Palin has established "a communications mechanism that gets around the mainstream media."

[See photos of Sarah Palin and her family.]

Republican strategist and commentator John Feehery said Palin, the 2008 vice presidential nominee, "is now the dominant media presence on the Republican/tea party front. She can make news quicker and more effectively than any other conservative Republican."

If she decides to run for president, Feehery said, "you would have to make her the favorite to win the nomination." He added, however, that he doubts she could beat President Barack Obama in November 2012.

That's a possibility that worries many Republicans. Polls, all conducted before the Tucson shootings, show Palin to be the most divisive of the potential GOP candidates. Many Americans are solidly for or against her, and relatively few are undecided.

"Will Palin run?" is almost a parlor game in political circles. Wednesday's video did little to settle it. Some politicians questioned why a presidential hopeful would take chances with phrases like "blood libel" at a time when many elected officials are trying to lower the rhetorical temperature.