House Puts Partisanship Aside After Giffords Shooting

The shooting in Arizona prompted leaders to postpone all major votes

January 12, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

This week, Congress was set for a rhetorical battle over healthcare reform and federal spending. But partisanship, at least within the Capital, has taken a back seat to national grieving. In response to the shooting in Tuscon, Arizona, which left six people dead and Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in critical condition, Congressional leaders have delayed all major votes until at least next week. [Photo Gallery: Gabrielle Giffords Shooting in Arizona.]

On Wednesday, Congress didn't debate a bill to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, even though it was initially scheduled for a vote. Rather, members of Congress came together to support a resolution honoring Giffords, as well as the others who were wounded or killed in the attack. House Speaker John Boehner choked back tears as he recalled one of those who lost his life -- Gabe Zimmerman, one of Giffords' Congressional staffers. "Like us, Gabe swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution," Boehner said. "At the time of the attack, he was engaged in the most simple and direct of democratic rituals: listening to people, to his neighbors." Boehner was joined by fellow Republican and Democratic Congressional leaders.

The House leadership has yet to announce when it will return to regular business. "This institution has an obligation to move forward doing the business of the people at the appropriate time," says Laena Fallon, a spokeswoman for Majority Leader Eric Cantor. The Senate was already scheduled to be in recess until January 24th.

Whether Congress can maintain a civil tone--or whether it will backpedal into partisan rancor--once regular business resumes remains to be seen. Congress will likely eventually take up repeal of healthcare reform. The bill will likely be mostly symbolic, as it has a slim chance of being approved by the Senate or President Obama. Congress will also likely soon take up the federal budget, as appropriations to the government are set to run out on March 4. At about the same time, Congress will also have to decide whether to raise the debt limit, which allows the Treasury to borrow money. Republicans have insisted that any votes to continue government funding and raise the debt ceiling also be accompanied with budget cuts.

But the shooting may swing Congressional debate away from the budget and towards other issues, such as gun control and decorum in politics. Already, two members of the House have proposed stiffening some gun control laws after the shooting. New York Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, a Democrat, proposed a ban on high capacity gun magazines. Critics claim that those gun clips, which were previously forbidden by the expired Assault Weapons Ban, make it easier for a gunman to target more victims. New York Rep. Peter King, a Republican, has also proposed a law which would ban firearms within 1,000 feet of an elected official. [Read more about gun control and gun rights.]

Rep. Bob Brady, a Pennsylvania Democrat, has also proposed expanding the current law against threats to the president to include members of Congress. The shooting initially provoked many lawmakers to question whether political rhetoric has become too heated--although there is little evidence that the alleged shooter, Jared Loughner, was influenced by current political debates.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Pete King,
Eric Cantor,
Carolyn McCarthy,
gun control and gun rights,
Republican Party,
Congress,
John Boehner,
Gabrielle Giffords,
deficit and national debt,
healthcare reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Old post!

Citizen of WI 2:28PM January 18, 2011

The idea of not allowing a gun within 1000 feet of an elected person would have the effect of forbidding a nextstore neighbor of an elected person from even having a gun in his own house, which would prevent him from his constitutional right to have a gun. Let's increase checks on gun sales, and increase the pentalties on those who use a gun in a crime to put them in jain longer. Of course anything to restrict guns will only prevent honest people from getting them. The criminal can always get them through other means.

Mike of CA 11:15AM January 18, 2011

I can rememeber not only the hate speech from the left about Bush, but the pictures of hanging him. No one had any problems with that. Beck hasn't made any hate speech against anyone, but pointed out who was a communist, and those working toward that end. He always says, to do their own checking, and not just take his word for it. He doesn't get anymore radical than some from the left do. There is a disagreement on policy, and if we are not able to openly disagree, we are in serious trouble. Obama himself spoke out and talked about knives and guns against the parties. He called the Republicans the enemy. That doesn't sound like President for all people. I don't know of anyone who disrespects the office of the Presidency, but there have been many who disrespect the president over the many decades of our Republic.

ph of KS 9:19AM January 18, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos