Constitution Reading Provokes Political Tussling

January 6, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

WASHINGTON — Republicans and Democrats took turns politely in a historic recitation of the Constitution from the House floor Thursday, but the decorum hardly meant they were in agreement.

In a nod to the tea partiers who put the Republicans in power, GOP lawmakers took time out from their campaign to change the way government works to read the document upon which the government was founded. Democrats went along but pointedly questioned the Republicans' insistence on omitting sections that show how the Constitution has changed over time — such as one that classified a slave as three-fifths of a person.

Approved in 1787 and in operation since 1789, the Constitution has long been a subject of both reverence and wrangling. This was the first time it had been read in its entirety on the House floor, a gesture to the tea party activists who contend it has been ignored as Washington has stretched the limits of federal power.

[Read more about the Constitution.]

It took an hour and a half for 135 lawmakers from both parties to go through the text. Leading off was new Speaker John Boehner, who recited the "We the People" preamble. He was followed by outgoing Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who read Section One of Article I that gives legislative powers to Congress. [Read more about Speaker Boehner.]

The recital, coming on the second day of the new session of Congress that thrust Republicans into power in the House, was conducted with calm respect, except for one brief outbreak from a protester in the visitors' gallery.

Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., read the section of the Constitution that set out the eligibility requirements for the presidency. As Pallone read the words "No person, except a natural-born citizen, or a citizen of the United States ..." a woman yelled out "except Obama, except Obama!" The presiding officer asked that she be ejected, and she was. Police later said Theresa Cao, 48, of New York, was charged with unlawful conduct and disruption of Congress.

So-called "birthers" claim President Barack Obama is ineligible for his office, contending there's no proof he was born in the United States. Some suggest he was actually born in Kenya, his father's home country. The Obama campaign provided a certificate of live birth in 2008, an official document from Hawaii showing the president's birth date, city and name, along with his parents' names.

[See a slide show of new faces in the Senate.]

Before the reading started, Democrats made their own, more subdued protest, asking why Republicans chose to omit sections, including those pertaining to slavery, that were later amended. In particular, they asked about the Article I, Section 2 clause that classified slaves as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of congressional apportionment and taxation.

Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., D-Ill., asked why those elements of American history were being left out, "given the struggle of African-Americans, given the struggle of women."

Rep. Bob Goodlatte, the Virginia Republican who organized the reading, said he and others had worked closely with the Library of Congress and the Congressional Research Service in coming up with the most accurate presentation of the Constitution. He noted to Jackson, son of civil rights leader Jesse Jackson, that another pioneer of the civil rights movement, Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., had been asked to read the Thirteenth Amendment that abolished slavery.

Tags:
Jesse Jackson Jr.,
Democratic Party,
John Lewis,
2010 Congressional elections,
Associated Press,
Congress,
John Boehner,
Nancy Pelosi,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

B Ritchie of PA and adorable Jeffy:

Hate to be trite, but so are YOU, Jeffy: If I got a dollar every time I heard the phrase: "a sip of Kool-Aid," I would be a wealthy woman. Come on, Jeffy, say something original. There is documentation all over the Internet; about the Tea Party and the Constitution; what is true and not true is what I am after.

i am still seriously waiting to hear Tea Partiers' actual thoughts about their relationship to the present U.S. Constitution, What I AM getting is a great deal of information from all over the Internet about the Tea Party and 14th Amendment concerns, in particular. The Tea Party also accuses Obama of overreaching his powers contained in the Constitution.. I want to know this too--seriously. What powers has Obama abused? Are they as bad as George W. Bush's (over 700) abuses of the U.S. Constitution?

B Ritchie of PA: I am clearly being mislead by the "mainstream media--and a "sheep" too? Now those ARE original phrases. Could you document who are the mainstream media? Would that be every other media source in the United States, except...those who agree with YOUR thinking? How about you steer me straight, and give out those media sites that ARE NOT mainstream media? How do you identify them? How do you know who is telling the truth and who is propagating propaganda? Do you look for purely primary documentation--investigative journalism sites--Public television/radio--the Congressional Record? How do you learn what is true and what is not?

I make a value judgment based on the Tea Party's very erratic media announcements and political candidates' statements on nearly every political topic. Doesn't the Tea Party have a definite agenda that all Tea Partiers follow? Don't you, at the least, get together and discuss what each candidate in the Tea Party is going to say to the media? Why, when I look up the Tea Party's agenda, and their" mixed messages," do I get 161, 000 explanations"?

By the way, B. Ritchie, even YOU can write an article for Wikipedia. Did you imagine that Wikipedia is the World Authority on facts? If you are depending on Wikipedia to be a primary source, "chuck full" of truthful information," you had better investigate Wikipedia's reputation at present. They are often a good reference to start, and, we can hope, eventually, that Wikipedia will evolve into telling the truth, but that has not entirely happened yet. Gosh! Just imagine! I learned about the faults of Wikipedia in the "mainstream media!" Now, who "woulda" thunk" it?!! Why, I guess I, actually an Independent voter, should toast to myself with "a sip of Kool-aid...."

anna banana of MI 9:38PM January 09, 2011

Rep Pete 'Talban' Session of TX showed his disrespect for the Constitution by not feeling it necessary to get sworn in before illegally voting in Congress. Pete could bother to leave the bar long enough to get sworn in. The GOP's callous hate and abuse of the Constitution is all too apparent, despite this phony theatrics on the House floor.

Now we got to see Session's Taliban tactics coming to life as Tea Party scum massacre Americans in Arizona. We get to see the true colors of the new reign of terror from Tea Baggers mentality that hates the US and our democratic form of government. This country is under siege and its time to put all the Tea party hatemonger rhetoric to hang from the yardarms. Starting with Palin who put Rep Giffords on a graphic of a scope in here efforts to rile the nuts.

Lyle of MN 5:13PM January 08, 2011

The Tea Parties are the Constitutional People's Militias. Their governmental function is to restore Constitutional Rule of Law, by whatever means necessary, whenever their elected governmental servants fail to uphold it. With American having been so radically transformed from a democracy to a plutocracy, with lobbies buying economically ruinous legislation and illegal wars, the Tea Party uprising is long overdue.

Jeugenen of MA 7:17PM January 07, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos