Homeland Security Chief Defends Airport Security

December 27, 2010 RSS Feed Print

WASHINGTON — Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano isn't giving any ground when it comes to the use of full-body scanners and invasive pat-downs at airports around the country.

While some travelers do not like them, Napolitano in an interview broadcast Sunday insisted the practices will not change for the "foreseeable future."

The new technology and the pat-downs are "objectively safer for our traveling public," said Napolitano, adding she's always looking to improve the security systems in place.

Napolitano also dismissed a recent news report about major airports failing secrets tests designed to get contraband such as guns and knives past security screeners. The report said some airports had a 70 percent failure rate.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Is TSA going too far with air security?]

"Many of them are very old and out of date and there were all kinds of methodology issues with them. Let's set those aside," she said on "State of the Union" on CNN. "We pick up more contraband with the new procedures and the new machinery."

Napolitano defended the director of national intelligence, James Clapper, who didn't know about a roundup of terrorist suspects in Britain when asked about the arrests on ABC News earlier this week. The gaffe created an awkward moment for the man in charge of the nation's intelligence community.

Napolitano and President Barack Obama's homeland security adviser, John Brennan, appeared on the ABC show with Clapper. They said Clapper had been preoccupied with handling problems on the Korean peninsula and passage of a nuclear weapons treaty with Russia.

[Read more about national security and terrorism.]

Napolitano said in the CNN interview that homeland security officials were fully aware what was happening in Britain.

"Well, let's be fair," she said. "I knew. John Brennan knew ... So one of the things I think that should be very clear to the American people is that those of us in homeland security who needed to know, we knew."

Officials have said that Clapper hadn't been briefed on the headline-making arrests before being interviewed on ABC News.

Tags:
Janet Napolitano,
Barack Obama,
national security terrorism and the military,
Associated Press

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I have a pump implanted in me and always have had to be patted down since I set off the metal detectors every time. I would MUCH rather be safe than sorry! I am GLAD they now have the body scanners because now sometimes I GET to got through the body scanner and the DON'T have to be patted down, which is MUCH faster! Let's all STOP WHINING!

M of WV 10:37AM December 30, 2010

I do not fly that often. If I have to fly again, I will not subject my body to this x-ray scanner. If they want to pat me down, absolutely NOT. I will go in a room where a female will be able to see my whole body as I will willing disrobe. She will not touch any part of me and I will then get dressed and leave. I am 71 and will not be patted down by some stranger. I have some physical issues about being touched. Also if i can i will take the bus if i don't have to travel very far. This is absolutely taking our freedom away. Why can't they use dogs, and the the other alternatives that do not require all this falderal. And why can't congress and the rest of the governtment employees be subject to this as well as pilots and attendents?????

Carol Gacioch RN RHIA of NC 3:10PM December 29, 2010

What is more important, the saving of lives and material things, or how males and females appear on an x-ray type machine???

I'll take the former!

Why make it esy for those terrorists that want to hurt the free World!

Franko of MA 9:42AM December 29, 2010

Photo Galleries

Before and After the Joplin Tornado

A look at Joplin one year after the deadly tornado.

advertisement

Latest Video