Obama Secures GOP Votes for U.S.-Russia Nuclear Pact

December 21, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama locked up enough Republican votes Tuesday to ratify a new arms control treaty with Russia that would cap nuclear warheads for both former Cold War foes and restart on-site weapons inspections.

Eleven Senate Republicans joined Democrats in a 67-28 proxy vote to wind up the debate and hold a final tally on Wednesday. They broke ranks with the Senate's top two Republicans and were poised to give Obama a win on his top foreign policy priority.

"We are on the brink of writing the next chapter in the 40-year history of wrestling with the threat of nuclear weapons," Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry, D-Mass., said after the vote.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Should the United State ratify the New START treaty?]

Ratification requires two-thirds of those voting in the Senate and Democrats needed at least nine Republicans to overcome the opposition of Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Jon Kyl of Arizona, the party's point man on the pact.

Momentum for the treaty accelerated earlier in the day Tuesday when Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, the No. 3 Republican in the Senate, endorsed the accord.

The treaty will leave the United States "with enough nuclear warheads to blow any attacker to kingdom come," Alexander said on the Senate floor, adding, "I'm convinced that Americans are safer and more secure with the New START treaty than without it." Four other Republican senators — Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Johnny Isakson of Georgia, Bob Corker of Tennessee and Robert Bennett of Utah — said they would back the pact.

"We know when we've been beaten," Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah told reporters hours before the vote.

Obama has insisted the treaty is a national security imperative that will improve cooperation with Russia, an argument loudly echoed by the nation's military and foreign policy leaders, former Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton and six Republican secretaries of state.

[Check out our roundup of this month's political cartoons.]

In a fresh appeal for ratification, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Tuesday that the treaty would "strengthen our leadership role in stopping the proliferation of nuclear weapons, and provide the necessary flexibility to structure our strategic nuclear forces to best meet national security interests."

Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton made a rare visit to the Capitol to lobby lawmakers.

Conservative foes of the accord — among them possible GOP presidential candidates Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich and Tim Pawlenty — argue the treaty would restrict U.S. options on a missile defense system to protect America and its allies and lacks sufficient procedures to verify Russia's adherence.

"The administration did not negotiate a good treaty. They went into the negotiations it seems to me with the attitude with the Russians just like the guy who goes into the car dealership and says, 'I'm not leaving here until I buy a car,'" Kyl said.

That opposition withered in the face of forceful statements from the military establishment, including Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen who said Monday that the treaty "enhances our ability to do that which we in the military have been charged to do: protect and defend the citizens of the United States."

Tags:
Lisa Murkowski,
Robert Bennett,
George Voinovich,
Lamar Alexander,
Olympia Snowe,
John Kerry,
Thad Cochran,
Bob Corker,
Congress,
Jon Kyl,
Orrin Hatch,
Richard Lugar,
Scott Brown,
Republican Party,
Associated Press,
national security terrorism and the military,
Mitch McConnell,
Johnny Isakson,
Ron Wyden,
Lindsey Graham,
Susan Collins,
Democratic Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

At first glance anyones' reaction would've been that he was leaving the US defenseless. That is not the case if he is only planning to be a one-term president then how can he go wrong with 1550 nuclear warheads on reserve. He is supposed to restore the 1550 with another 85 billion within ten years. That is probably why he didn't get the support he needed, but this has been a major accomplishment for a man named Barak Obama.

Nathaniel T. of CA 1:46AM December 22, 2010

It seems to me these two senators will never vote for the good of America as long as President Obama is President. These two characters and the tea baggers are traitors and forget that they are elected to represent the good for America; not for egos or the republicans.

I am sure not all Republicans are like these clowns.- I am not in agreement with all that President Obama is doing but the START Treaty was for the good of this country and the world

Lou Delgado of CA 12:15AM December 22, 2010

Photo Galleries

Storms, Wildfires Tear Across U.S.

Heavy rain, high winds and fire continue to plague regions throughout the country.

advertisement

Latest Videos