Poll: Obama Would Beat Palin in 2012

November 4, 2010 RSS Feed Print

BY Aliyah Shahid
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

The midterm elections are so yesterday. The eyes of many political insiders are already turning to 2012.

President Obama would handily beat Sarah Palin in the next presidential election, despite strong anti-incumbent feelings and the Democrats losing the House to the GOP this week, a new CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll indicates.

And while Obama would win against the Tea Party favorite, 52% to 44% among registered voters, pit the President against Mike Huckabee and it's an entirely different story.

[Read more about the 2012 presidential election.]

The former Arkansas Governor and 2008 GOP White House candidate would beat Obama 52% to 44% in a hypothetical matchup, the survey reveals.

While there's no clear GOP frontrunner, 21% Republicans said they're most likely to back Huckabee, 20% said they'd support former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, 14% said they'd back Palin and 12% were for ex-House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

Romney would also beat Obama 50 % to 45%, but Obama would beat Gingrich 49% to 47%. The poll's sampling error was plus or minus 3%.

[Check out a roundup of political cartoons on Obama.]

Huckabee and Romney have not publicly committed to seeking the post, but Palin has said that she'd run for president if "nobody else wanted to step up." Similarly, Gingrich has been flirting with the idea of a run, recently telling the Washington Post that his decision will be based on "whether or not it is practical, which I increasingly think it is."

Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty of Indiana, Rep. Mike Pence of Indiana and former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania all accrued single-digit support.

"Looking ahead to 2012, it may be too early to count Barack Obama out, particularly if Sarah Palin is his opponent," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland.

"The former Alaska governor gets a lot of attention, but she is in third place when Republicans are asked to pick a presidential nominee, and in a hypothetical matchup with Obama she is arguably the weakest candidate of the top-tier GOP hopefuls."

Tags:
Mike Huckabee,
New York Daily News,
Haley Barbour,
2010 election,
Barack Obama,
Tim Pawlenty,
Newt Gingrich,
Sarah Palin,
republican party,
2012 presidential election,
Ron Paul,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The reason that, according to Times(sic) and Newsweek "any Conservative was wrong no matter what" is that any Conservative was wrong no matter what.

Jamie of IL 1:32AM November 18, 2010

Obama is a Republican, but at least he's not the new mental ward type Republican, so if you don't want to see a President Huckabee (shudder), you'd better vote in your Republican primary in '12 and vote Palin. The dirty, dirty feeling will go away in no time-- you're doing the right thing. Go, Sarah, Go! (shudder)

Jamie of IL 1:25AM November 18, 2010

Ralph of Arizona, I think that you must have been reading Times or Newsweek instead of the above article. US News and World Report is my favorite news magazine. They seem to be centrist in their philosophy, unlike Newsweek and Times, which are way over on the left side. With those two Obama and the RePO team could do no wrong but, any Conservative was wrong no matter what. At least the RePO team has been busted up a little as the P(Pelosi)has been relegated to the minor league.

DTK of MO 7:19PM November 06, 2010

Photo Galleries

Ring of Fire Eclipse

A rare solar eclipse created a "ring of fire" effect.

advertisement

Latest Video