U.S. Marines Leader Against Lifting Gay Ban

September 21, 2010 RSS Feed Print

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's choice to lead the Marine Corps told the Senate Tuesday that Congress should not repeal the law barring gays from serving openly in the military, dealing a blow to gay rights advocates just hours before a crucial test vote.

Senate Democrats have attached repeal of the 17-year-old "don't ask, don't tell" law to a bill authorizing $726 billion in military spending next year.

By Tuesday morning, the bill's prospects appeared dim. Advancing the measure could come down to a single vote, because Democrats need the support of at least one Republican to get the necessary 60 votes needed to end debate.

Sen. Susan Collins, a moderate Republican from Maine, was seen as crucial to the bill's chances because she supports lifting the ban. But Collins has complained that Democrats are not giving her GOP colleagues a chance to be heard. [See which industries donate the most money to Collins.]

Amos told the Senate Armed Services Committee he worried that a shake up in personnel policy would serve as a "distraction" to Marines fighting in Afghanistan.

"My primary concern with proposed repeal is the potential disruption to cohesion that may be caused by significant change during a period of extended combat operations," he said in a written statement provided to the panel for his confirmation hearing.

During one exchange with Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., Amos said he would implement any changes in the law on gay service made by Congress. He said the Marine Corps would rely on discipline and leadership to ensure order, but that he didn't envision a gag order on troops who disagreed with revoking the ban.

Some Republicans have suggested they fear troops who openly oppose gay service would be punished for speaking out.

"I don't see this as a racist issue," Amos said. "I see this as an anxious issue ... because we don't have the answers yet."

The law is already under siege. A federal judge in California recently ruled the ban on gays was unconstitutional, polls suggest a majority of Americans oppose it and Lady Gaga has challenged it in a YouTube video.

Repeal advocates say the law deprives the military of capable soldiers and violates civil rights.

But Sen. John McCain of Arizona and other prominent Republicans are fighting to keep the law in place, at least until the Pentagon completes a survey later this year on the repeal's likely effect on troops. GOP critics say lifting the ban at a time when troops are fighting two wars would undermine morale.

"I regret to see that the long-respected and revered Senate Armed Services Committee has evolved into a forum for a social agenda of the liberal left of the Senate," McCain said last week on the Senate floor.

An estimated 13,000 people have been discharged under the law since its inception in 1993. Although most dismissals have resulted from gay service members outing themselves, gay rights' groups say the ban has been used by vindictive co-workers to drum out troops who never made their sexuality an issue.

Top defense leaders, including Secretary Robert Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen, have said they support a repeal but want to move slowly to ensure that the changes won't harm troop morale.

Gates has asked Congress not to act until the military finishes a study, due Dec. 1, on how to lift the ban without causing problems.

He also has said he could live with the proposed legislation because it would postpone implementation until 60 days after the Pentagon completes its review and the president certifies that repeal won't hurt morale, recruiting or retention.

The provision is included in a broader defense policy bill that authorizes $726 billion in military spending for next year, including $159 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and a 1.4 percent pay raise for the troops.

Tags:
Robert Gates,
Susan Collins,
Olympia Snowe,
Jeff Sessions,
Mike Mullen,
2010 election,
Congress,
democratic party,
Barack Obama,
military,
John McCain,
national security terrorism and the military,
Associated Press,
republican party,
War in Afghanistan (2001-),
Marine Corps

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

This Bill is going to affect the cohesiveness of US Infantry Units for a long time.

Yet I'm sure that this will eventually pass because in ten years we will have many openly Gay Marines! But I shall warn You, that the path will be a very difficult One! Once a gay marine arrives in Parris Island Life will be made difficult for him to survive! The other recruits that have a hate for gay's will make their lives unbearable. To include the Drill Instructors! These are hard core Combat Marines with battle experience in Iraq and Afghanistan. I truly feel sorry for these young Marines, Yet I wish them well!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Semper FI

Frank N of VA 11:52PM December 18, 2010

so im a homosexual. get over it. i dont plan on going to the military because i really dont feel like being killed for who i am by some homophobic freak. my uncle was in the military and gay. no one knew til he got a bf who was also in military so when ppl found out, they got kicked out. and war isnt a privilage. its a right! its every mans right to fend for their country. i dont see why u hateful ppl wouldnt want us there since u want us dead and say were immoral so much. war is the easiest way to get rid of ppl but whatever. its funny cause gays end up being the most successful. hello? half of the television broadcasts like WAVE and WHAS have gay couples and their the most watched shows. ellen made it big. Lady Gaga has definately made it to the top. and where are the straight ppl? stuck online discriminating against some of the nicest ppl you'll meet. what would u do if u were dying and u had a gay doctor trying to save ur life? i would still help ur ass becasue it would be my job. just how serving in the military is our job.

Vincent of IN 11:21AM November 02, 2010

Lifting the ban on homosexuals openly serving in the military is obviously a very controversial issue and both sides present a strong case however, I believe keeping capable and qualified individuals out of the military solely because they are gay is ignorant. Opposition to lifting the ban believe it will damage unit cohesion and morale because it will make straight soldiers uncomfortable, by saying this they’re assuming that every homosexual is flamboyant and will force their sexuality upon everyone. If an individual is going to make the huge commitment to serve their country they are obviously dedicated and are working towards something, they’re not just there to purposely make people feel uncomfortable and hit on other soldiers. I’ve recently done some research on specific cases of soldiers being discharged due to this policy and it just doesn’t make sense. An 18 year veteran and decorated soldier was discharged because someone found out that he happened to be gay and nearly 1,000 specialists have been discharged as well. How is this reasonable? These people are qualified and dedicated individuals whose goal in life is to serve their country, why should they be denied just because the military is homophobic? Being homosexual doesn’t make them any less qualified or capable of doing something. I’m sure there are women in the military that have to put up with men hitting on them, harassing them, and making them feel uncomfortable on a daily basis, should these men not be able to serve as well since this is one of the only arguments against homosexuals being in the military. Discharging these soldiers strictly because they are homosexual is tactless because it wastes government money, limits our country’s military resources, and threatens our own national security since many of the people discharged are specialists with critical skills.

Lyndsay F. of FL 9:22PM October 31, 2010

advertisement

Latest Video