Republicans Block 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Repeal

September 21, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (18)

WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked an effort to repeal the ban on gays from serving openly in the military, handing gay rights groups a defeat in their last chance any time soon to overturn the law known as "don't ask, don't tell."

Democrats fell short of the 60 votes needed to advance the legislation, which authorized $726 billion in defense spending. The vote was 56-43.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, had been seen as the crucial 60th vote because she supports overturning the military ban. But Collins sided with her GOP colleagues in arguing that Republicans weren't given sufficient leeway to offer amendments to the wide-ranging policy bill.

The vote fell mostly along party lines, although Sens. Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor, both D-Ark., sided with Republicans to block the bill. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., also voted against the measure as a procedural tactic. Under Senate rules, casting his vote with the majority of the Senate enables him to revive the bill at a later date.

Advocates of lifting the 17-year-old ban had been optimistic that the Democratic-controlled White House and Congress could overcome objections to repeal. The move is unpopular among Republicans, military officers and social conservatives.

Gay rights advocates now worry they have lost a crucial opportunity to change the law. If Democrats lose seats in elections this fall, repealing the ban will prove even more difficult — if not impossible — next year.

An estimated 13,000 people have been discharged under the law since its inception in 1993. Although most dismissals have resulted from gay service members outing themselves, gay rights' groups say it has been used by vindictive co-workers to drum out troops who never made their sexuality an issue.

Top defense officials, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, have said they support a repeal but want to move slowly to ensure changes won't hurt morale.

Tags:
Blanche Lincoln,
Mark Pryor,
Congress,
2010 Congressional elections,
Associated Press,
national security terrorism and the military,
Republican Party,
Harry Reid,
Susan Collins,
Democratic Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

so what does it matter if their sexual orientation was known. Most soldier’s don’t care if they are working next to someone that is gay.

It's discriminatory and ridiculous.

Lee of AK 7:47PM October 09, 2010

The naive among us simply don't understand the havoc such a policy change would have on the military. This is akin to opening the Boy Scout leadership to pedophiles.

Vinoman of PA 8:13AM September 27, 2010

If sexual attraction wouldn't cause any problems we wouldn't put male and female soldiers into separate sleeping quarters, showers, etc.

Should openly gay men now be put up with straight females and lesbians with straight men?

On second thought, DADT may not be so bad after all.

Franz Sperisen of NM 10:55PM September 22, 2010

Photo Galleries

Storms, Wildfires Tear Across U.S.

Heavy rain, high winds and fire continue to plague regions throughout the country.

advertisement

Latest Videos