Military Gay Ban Becomes Election-Year Hot Button

September 21, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

WASHINGTON — It's John McCain versus Lady Gaga on Tuesday as the Senate takes up the emotional issue of repealing the ban on gays serving openly in the military.

Senate Democrats have attached repeal of the 17-year-old "don't ask, don't tell" law to a bill authorizing $726 billion in military spending next year. The fate of the move appears uncertain, but whichever way the votes go, repeal seems destined to become a major issue in this fall's midterm elections.

The law is already under siege. A federal judge in California recently ruled the ban on gays was unconstitutional, polls suggest a majority of Americans oppose it and Lady Gaga has challenged it in a YouTube video.

Repeal advocates say the law deprives the military of capable soldiers and violates civil rights.

But McCain of Arizona and other prominent Republicans are fighting to keep the law in place, at least until the Pentagon completes a survey later this year on repeal's likely effect on troops. GOP critics say lifting the ban at a time when troops are fighting two wars would undermine morale.

"I regret to see that the long-respected and revered Senate Armed Services Committee has evolved into a forum for a social agenda of the liberal left of the Senate," McCain said last week on the Senate floor.

An estimated 13,000 people have been discharged under the law since its inception in 1993. Although most dismissals have resulted from gay service members outing themselves, gay rights' groups say it has been used by vindictive co-workers to drum out troops who never made their sexuality an issue.

Top defense leaders, including Secretary Robert Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen, have said they support a repeal but want to move slowly to ensure changes won't hurt morale.

Gates has asked Congress not to act until the military finishes a study, due Dec. 1, on how to lift the ban without causing problems.

He also has said he could live with the proposed legislation because it would postpone implementation until 60 days after the Pentagon completes its review and the president certifies that repeal won't hurt morale, recruiting or retention.

The provision is included in a broader defense policy bill that authorizes $726 billion in military spending for next year, including $159 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and a 1.4 percent pay raise for the troops.

By reviving the issue just before the midterm Congressional elections, Democrats are trying to score points with their political base and portray Republicans as obstructionists willing to shoot down a bill that includes the pay raises.

According to a February 2010 poll by the Pew Research Center, 61 percent of Americans said they favor allowing gays to serve openly, while 27 percent said they are opposed.

"Don't ask, don't tell" has become a perennial battleground in America's ongoing culture wars. This time, though, the forces backing repeal seem closer to victory than ever because Democrats control both the White House and Congress.

The House has already passed similar legislation. More recently, a federal judge in Los Angeles sided with a gay rights group and ruled that the military's policy violates due-process and free-speech rights.

Pop star Lady Gaga led a political rally in favor of repeal in Maine on Monday. The state is home to the two Republican senators — Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins — seen as most likely to side with Democrats on the issue. Lady Gaga said it was unjust to have goodhearted gay soldiers booted from military service while straight soldiers who harbor hatred toward gays are allowed to fight for their country.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
national security terrorism and the military,
Olympia Snowe,
2010 Congressional elections,
Susan Collins,
John McCain,
defense spending,
Associated Press,
Congress,
Republican Party,
deficit and national debt,
Harry Reid

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It was religon that helped create this nation. A knowlage of a higher power. Attacking someone because they have religious beliefs that include marriage between one man and one women is wrong. So is the idea that people who are against DADT are religious. There are people who are against DADT because they think it's wrong. So it's OK to sterotype people against DADT, but as long as you do it, it's just fine! Sterotyping is DISCRIMINATION! Yet people are being kind, and not accusing others of being reglious biggots...

Are there any homosexuals denied voting privaliges, driving privaliages etc. Because of thier orientation. One person of an oppisite sex can marry another person off an oppisite sex. What a simple concept...

Homosexuals still serve in the Armed Services? How can it be discrimination. The difference is, people want to keep peoples private issues private. What if homosexuals wanted privacy rights?... What if they said, that opening the door to DADT violated privacy rights they have as a US citizen?

There is proof that hetrosexuals are being mistreated because of this. Do you see them argue about discrimnation of thier sexual orentaiton?....

The reason you don't is there is a fact for everyone who serves in the Armed Services, your property of Uncle Sam! Your rights go down the tubes! So does your indaviduality is gone once you sign the dotted line!

If they truely wish to serve, why does thier sexuality come first and not the USA? If they don't like the Armed Services, they can leave....

Nobody is putting a gun to thier heads...to serve.

People talk about equality and human rights. Rights for law-abiding citizens. But if that was the case more progressives would stand-up for unborn children. Obama wouldn't want his daugher burdened with a child. If people put there money where there mouth was... alot more children, would be alive.

Children of different races, colors and sexual orention etc...

I'm Not Gay Either... of MI 8:49PM September 21, 2010

I am not gay, but am amazed at how those who claim to want the constitution to be our literal guidepost try to ignore the constitution when it comes to gay rights.

Minorities are in the military, women are too. The nay-sayers all said it would never work. Well, it did. So why do we still discriminate against gay people? It's a disgrace for a nation who professes to treat its people well.

Sad to hear some use religion and their personal views to limt the rights of others. That is NOT what this country is supposed to be about. These people have served with honor and bravery - but somehow their service is "less" because of their personal tastes? How many straight people have been discharged because they tried to hit on another soldier of the opposite sex?

Tell the rest of the world we are no longer about equal rights, as long as we exclude some groups who have broken no laws.... They will see us as hypocrites - saying one thing, doing another.

Equal is equal for all law-abiding citizens. NO EXCEPTIONS.

DeeToo of SC 10:24AM September 21, 2010

Photo Galleries

Women on Death Row

Only 12 women have been executed on death row in the U.S. since 1976.

advertisement

Latest Videos