Gay Marriage on Hold in California

August 17, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (11)

BY Bill Hutchinson
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

A California federal appeals court put the brakes on gay marriage Monday just as same-sex couples were preparing to line up for wedding licenses.

The decision by the three-judge panel trumps a lower court judge's ruling that a gay marriage ban passed by California voters in 2008 was unconstitutional.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals put gay marriage on hold indefinitely, but agreed to expedite the case, scheduling arguments on Dec. 6.

Lawyers representing two same-sex couples who challenged the ban said they would not appeal the court's decision.

"We are very gratified that the 9th Circuit has recognized the importance and the pressing nature of this case," said lawyer Ted Boutrous.

California's county clerks were preparing to issue same-sex marriage licenses beginning tomorrow. But they'll now have to wait until at least the 9th Circuit's ruling.

The case is expected to wind up before the U.S. Supreme Court eventually.

The latest twist comes a week after Chief U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker ruled the Proposition 8 ban violated equal protection and due-process rights of gays and lesbians.

Walker issued his decision following a 13-week trial to decide the constitutionality of the ban.

In his ruling, Walker wrote it is "irrelevant" that the majority of California voters supported Proposition 8.

Backers of Proposition 8 immediately appealed Walker's ruling to the 9th Circuit.

Supporters of the ban argued it was necessary to safeguard the traditional understanding of marriage and to encourage responsible childbearing.

Foes countered that it discriminated against gay couples.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown urged Walker to allow same-sex marriages to go forward and have publicly supported his decision.

When gay marriage was briefly legal in California between May and November 2008, more than 18,000 same-sex couples wed.

If it is allowed again, California would join Massachusetts, Iowa, Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire and Washington as the only places in the country to allow gay marriage.

Tags:
LGBT rights,
Arnold Schwarzenegger,
Proposition 8,
New York Daily News,
marriage,
Supreme Court

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I am not gay. Neither am I black. I would no sooner deny a social right to a black person than I would a homosexual. Those in opposition of gay marriage are bigots to the extent of any prejudice group. Separation of church and state is hard to find being that most of our country is christian, but soon a new generation of people indifferent to sexual orientation, race, religion, and way of life will take over the country, and a feeling of understanding and unquestioning love will find a place in the hearts of all people, sea to sea. That is what it should take to be an American, and I can't stand to see people in such blatant disregard for the feelings and lifestyle of others. Make a gay friend. Then maybe you too can see that we're all human.

Chris of TX 4:53PM August 21, 2010

Seems as if the gays want to strap it on to the straight people and shove their lifestyle down their throats a poke it in the their rears.

Tyrone Shoelaces of DC 9:32AM August 19, 2010

"They are the are people who want total government control of private lives and they'll use any group they ca to try to get support in the guise of caring for them."

Exactly! Which is why you are advocating for prop8, which is government control of people's private lives, which... wait what?!?

oliver of CA 9:31PM August 17, 2010

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos