U.S. Braces for Blowback Over Afghan War Disclosures

July 27, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

Hayden predicted the Taliban would take anything that described a U.S. strike and the intelligence behind it "and figure out who was in the room when that particular operation, say in 2008, was planned, and in whose home." Then the militants would probably punish the traitor who'd worked with the Americans, he said.

"It's possible that someone could get killed in the next few days," said former senior intelligence officer Robert Riegle. He recalled what happened when the U.S. arrested the Soviet double agent, Robert Hanssen: "When people found out what we knew, people died."

Another casualty may be the U.S. attempts to forge cooperation with Pakistan's secretive intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence.

Multiple American cables complain about ISI complicity with the Taliban. And they also tell the Pakistanis "how much we know about them," said Riegle, who now runs Mission Concepts Inc., a private intelligence firm.

"You're not going to see any cooperation," he said. "People are going to freeze."

The raw data released Sunday may also prove useful in a wider way to America's "frenemies" — the intelligence services of countries like China and Russia, who have the resources to process and make sense of such vast vaults of data, said Ellen McCarthy, former intelligence officer and president of the Intelligence and National Security Alliance.

Hayden said: "If I'm head of the Russian intelligence, I'm getting my best English speakers and saying: 'Read every document, and I want you to tell me, how good are these guys? What are their approaches, their strengths, their weaknesses and their blind spots?'"

Former CIA official Paul Pillar described what he called the coming chill in the U.S. intelligence community, which had been pushed into sharing information across agencies in the aftermath of the intelligence failures that led to 9/11.

"The pendulum will now swing back," he said. Pillar, who now teaches at Georgetown University, said the community would shift from "need to know" back to "need to protect."

Morrell was interviewed on CBS's "The Early Show" and Bond appeared on NBC's "Today" show.

Tags:
Michael Hayden,
John Kerry,
Associated Press,
al Qaeda,
War in Afghanistan (2001-),
Pentagon

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Where is the real danger ?

We have more trouble here at home than in Afghanistan or with corruption in Packistan. We have our own corrupt government which is daily doing its best to destroy this country. I'm sure that many in Washington are trying to do the right thing. However they are too few. There are just too many idiots pretending that they are smart and who don't have a clue on how to fix what they have done. They are still only interested in re-election. Why should they worry unless the Wikileaks just might name some of them?

AYE, THERE'S THE RUB!

Frank of CA 11:46AM July 28, 2010

Did we really need the WidiLeaks report to tell us the war isn't going well? The reality is that these governments are corrupt and the population, weak, uneducated and defenseless against their fanatical leaders. Many of the people have an unwavering allegiance towards their religious leaders who themselves are fanatical and corrupt.

Perhaps, Russia wasn't so wrong in the way they dealt with the Republic of Georgia? They sent a strong message and got out.

Steven Riback of NJ 10:59AM July 28, 2010

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos