Gun Rights Groups Out-Donate Gun Control Groups

The NRA leads the pack in terms of political contributions to members of Congress.

July 13, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Some say the right to bear arms is an antiquated notion, but the topic seems to be of perennial interest in Washington. The issue got national attention last month, when the Supreme Court reaffirmed gun ownership as a fundamental Constitutional right that can trump more restrictive local laws. But gun ownership is also a constant presence in the world of campaign finance, with groups that advocate for gun control and gun rights both contributing to Congressional campaigns. [See who in Congress gets the most from gun control groups.]

Political action committees and individuals associated with gun rights groups have contributed over 116 times as much to 2010 candidates as gun control groups have contributed. A vast majority of this money comes from the National Rifle Association. Among the other gun rights groups that have donated money to federal candidates this election cycle are the Gun Owners of America and the Ohio Gun Collectors' Association. [See who in Congress gets the most from gun rights groups.]

Data from the Center for Responsive Politics show that, of the $586,371 that gun rights organizations have contributed to candidates this election cycle, 74 percent of it ($436,821) has gone to Republicans. Topping the list of candidates is Republican Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, with $14,100 from gun rights groups, followed by Massachusetts Republican Sen. Scott Brown, who received $13,970 in gun rights money in his successful January run for the seat vacated by Ted Kennedy. Rep. John Boehner of Ohio is third, with $12,650 from individuals and PACs associated with gun rights organizations. Democrats do not appear until much further down the list: the top Democratic recipient, Alabama Rep. Bobby Bright, is at number 15, with $6,100. Altogether, 210 current members of Congress have received money from gun rights groups during the 2010 election cycle. [See which industries contribute the most to Boehner's campaign.]

Individuals and PACs associated with gun control groups have given far less money this election, with $5,050 total. Over half of this money has come from one PAC--the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence Voter Education Fund. All of the money contributed by gun rights organizations has gone to seven candidates, all of them Democratic incumbents. New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand has received the most gun control money, $3,300, followed by Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley, with $500, and five representatives (Phil Hare of Illinois, Michael McMahon and Daniel Maffei of New York, Gerry Connolly of Virginia, and Mary Jo Kilroy of Ohio) with $250 each.

Tags:
John Boehner,
NRA,
Kirsten Gillibrand,
Bobby Bright,
Gerald Connolly,
Michael McMahon,
Mary Jo Kilroy,
Jeff Merkley,
Phil Hare,
Dan Maffei,
John Thune,
gun control and gun rights,
Congress,
Scott Brown

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Begin forwarded message:

Subject: Fwd: ED SCHULTZ...NATIONAL TALK HOST...DISABLED VETERAN DENIED JUSTICE IN STURGIS, SD!

Please look at his webpage AND PASS ON TO OTHERS:

http://edschultz.invisionzone.com/index.php?showtopic=63544

Rick Thorne of SD 10:09AM December 23, 2010

Dave you are an idiot - probably a gay idiot

pwh of MD 12:09AM September 21, 2010

I am not a NRA member. Never have been. I am a retired Peace Officer. I have seen the violence and aftermath of those who prey on members of our society.

Here is the truth, your police even with a quick response time (4 to 6 minutes) can not be there to protect you during those crtical earl minutes. So, it is up to you to submit to the will of the rapist, home invader or thief OR to defend yourself.

If you defend yourself with pepper spray - 5 to 7 % of the US Population will have no immediate effect to the spray. And some are immune to it. With training, one can learn to minimize the effect of the spray and continue the attack. With training one can learn to minimize the effect of stun guns and continue the attack.

I have seen those who have defended themselves with a weapon (handgun, shotgun or rifle) who never fired a shot. Most of the time the crooks ran because they fear those who are trained to defend themselves. These incidents almost never make the news. Why? They are not sensational and they are not news worthy.

People have a choice. Be a victim or slave to the criminals. Or be a responsible defender of self, family and others. I choose the later. How about you?

John R. Carpenter of CA 11:08AM July 16, 2010

advertisement

Latest Video