Packed Agenda Could Stall Immigration Reform

Obama outlined a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants already in the United States

July 7, 2010 RSS Feed Print

In his first major speech on immigration reform since taking office, President Obama called for a "practical, common sense approach" to dealing with one of the highest-voltage third rails in American politics. While thin on specifics, he outlined a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants already in the United States that would include paying a fine, waiting in line behind legal immigrants, and learning to speak English. "The politics of who is and who is not allowed to enter the country, and on what terms, has always been contentious," Obama said at American University's School of International Service.

Using the term "contentious" appears to understate just how polarizing the issue of illegal immigration has become. The state of Arizona this spring passed one of the strictest ordinances in the country, criminalizing those living in the state without proper papers and allowing local police to ask about the immigration status of those detained for even minor crimes. Yesterday, the Justice Department sued to stop the law from taking effect. The law has sparked demonstrations and several boycotts of the state from critics who contend that the law will lead to racial profiling. Its supporters argue it was the border state's only recourse in the face of federal inaction. Obama called Arizona's foray into what has traditionally been the purview of federal law enforcement "ill-conceived."

But passage of the Arizona law is only a symptom of the larger national anxiety over the estimated 11 million people living illegally in the country. The stagnant economy and high unemployment, ongoing violence along the border connected with the drug trade, and a surge in domestic right-wing political activism have all helped push immigration forcefully back into the national spotlight. Recent national polling suggests that the public favors some form of comprehensive reform, while disapproving of the government's current efforts. Polls also show that a large majority of respondents, 60 percent, consider illegal immigration a "very serious problem" and that a similarly large majority, 58 percent, support the Arizona law.

Since comprehensive reform was first made a national priority by the Bush administration in 2006, the federal government has conducted more raids on employers hiring illegal workers and expanded border security efforts. Most likely in anticipation of Republican counter-arguments, Obama pointed out in his speech that the current force along the southern U.S. border is the largest ever. Securing the border has been a persistent precondition for support for comprehensive immigration reform from many Republicans and an increasing number of Democrats.

Inside the beltway, however, the political reality for the Democrats is clear: They need 60 votes in the Senate to overcome Republican filibustering tactics, which the GOP has either threatened or deployed for nearly every piece of major legislation that the Senate has considered since Obama took office. "Reform that brings accountability to our immigration system cannot pass without Republican votes," Obama said. "That is the political and mathematical reality." An obstructed Senate and a legislative calendar already booked solid with a slew of big-name legislation on banking and energy portends that immigration reform, like millions of prospective immigrants, may have to wait in a very long line.

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

We need the enforcement of existing laws that was promised to us in 1986 in exchange for the one-time only amnesty of that year. Right now enforcement is so lax that we have almost open borders, and the only reasons we only have 12-20 million illegals here rather than 100 million or more are the oceans that separate our continent from others. Having some sort of amnesty without first getting illegal immigration under control would only send a signal to the world's disenfranchised that if they sneak in and stay long enough, they too will eventually get our most prized possession.

Aside from more obvious issues like wage depression, unemployment, and social spending, why are our leaders not thinking long term about whether having a nation of 500 million or more people is a desirable thing? California, with about 40 million people already has polluted air and waters, congestion, not to mention a shortage of fresh water. All of our environmental problems are harder, not easier, to manage with a lower population. Increasing population puts a strain on our available natural resources and open spaces.

This all feels like a race to the bottom for me. No to legalization ("reform"), yes to the enforcement our government has the duty to perform.

Mary of CA 4:25PM July 08, 2010

For the Administration to halt the progress on the fence as soon as he came in office was impossible to understand. Untill you get into the agenda of legalizing illegal imigrants for voting purposes. Not all hispanics agree with imigration amnesty as many are waiting and have waited to enter legaly. What gives mexico any more deserving than columbia, El Salvador, Kenya, Haiti to name a few.

If the liberal base cares about being fair than be fair. Amnesty didnt work last time and wont ever work. A process for imigration exists. People seeking employment need to respect the law. Knowingly hiring Illegals should bring harsh fines of probably $10,000.00 each with mandatory jail sentences that would slow it down.

Before any reforms can be discussed the federal govt must enforce the laws. Faiure to do this is a failure to perform. In the real working world that would be termination of employeement.

The heads of the dept of Justice, homeland security, ICE, and the oval office have failed to act to enforce existing laws. Thier is no excuse for any President or his apointees to ignore a law which concerns the security of this nation.

Many are right you will never stop border crossings but you will definatley slow it down and make it more dificult. The best way to keep people honest is to remove temptation.

Mr President do your job, and make those who work for you do thiers.

jerry of NY 8:42AM July 08, 2010

Well to the guy who stated MSN by a misquote - how about FOX (Fascist organizes xenophobes).

Obama wants this done - the crybaby Republicans have halted any legislation which will give credit to Obama and are not serving their country. They use propaganda filled with hate and pessimism in order to rally their small base.

They say secure the borders then work on reform. They know that true securing the borders is impossible so they are talking smack - this goes for those who seem to use the same logic.

You can't have states doing the feds work - so what happens next. They send them to ICE, who then do nothing but free them based on instructions given out by the Fed. Then you have us the Tax payer pay for keeping your state jobs to house these people. What a joke.

Get with the program. Stop listen to stupid firms such as Federation of crap with their flawed stats - sounds like hill billy joe who just made things up as he saw fit. This organisation is like the Nazi party trying to justify lies to get what they want.

If we deport 11m people - we will be really broke. Then our industry will further go onto China as we cannot compete with Tomatoes at $10 a pound - you get my point. However the Republicans of NO think its alright to sell to the highest bidder and offer its citizens the shaft.

So the logical step, get these people on paper as a huge population of them have children or family ties ( unless you want to go back to the slave generation or repeat of removing the Chinese US citizens ( who built your railroads that made this country - contrary to what the bigots claim - the Chinese did the most dangerous work - which made it possible for that railroad to exist), offer reasonable rights for farm workers to come and go ( trust me no one wants to break their back in sweltering heat for $5 an hour - look up the law, there are no regulations for minimum wage here), so they have no reason to want to stay past their time.

Simple logic, we keep our middle class jobs because industry does not go abroad the Walmart way and they feel like actually following laws that are practical.

Dan Mitchell of TN 9:10PM July 07, 2010

Photo Galleries

Daredevils

Extreme risk-takers of today and throughout history.

advertisement

Latest Video