As Dems Lay Low, GOP Hits Obama on Arizona Lawsuit

July 7, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

WASHINGTON — Republicans denounced the Obama administration's challenge of Arizona's new immigration law Tuesday, a fresh sign they may try to paint Democrats this fall as soft on illegal border crossings.

While Democrats stayed largely quiet, a host of Republicans said the federal government has no business challenging Arizona's new law. Slated to be implemented July 29, it would require state and local police to question and possibly arrest illegal immigrants during the enforcement of other laws such as traffic stops.

"If the president wants to make real progress on this issue, he can do so by taking amnesty off the table and focus his efforts on border and interior security," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

But some Democratic strategists say the GOP is playing a dangerous game. Past GOP bids to crack down on illegal immigration have driven Latino voters into Democrats' arms, as was seen most dramatically in California in the 1990s. And Americans who are most passionate about illegal immigration tend to be reliable Republican voters anyway, and not up for grabs, these strategists say.

"There's no evidence that Republicans have been able to turn this issue into a winning issue in a general election," said Simon Rosenberg, who follows immigration matters as head of the liberal-leaning group NDN. If top Republicans keep pounding the issue, he said, it could increase Democratic turnout in Texas, Arizona, Nevada, California and possibly other states.

The politics of immigration has a complex past and unclear future.

Republican President George W. Bush failed to persuade a GOP-controlled Congress to enact comprehensive changes that would have included pathways to legal status for millions of illegal immigrants. Democrats prospered in the next two elections, in 2006 and 2008, when immigration was a back-burner issue. In 2008, Republicans chose as their presidential nominee Sen. John McCain of Arizona, once a champion of Bush's immigration efforts.

But McCain, like many other Republicans and some Democrats, has shifted to the right on the issue. Facing a tough GOP primary, McCain has run a campaign ad saying "complete the danged fence." Three years ago, he had dismissed the effectiveness of building a fence on the U.S.-Mexico border.

He joined numerous well-known GOP officials in criticizing President Barack Obama's decision Tuesday.

They included Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele and House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio. Boehner said the federal government should not sue Arizona but should help that state and others "stop the crime and lawlessness along the border." [See where Boehner's campaign cash comes from.]

Top Democratic elected officials had little to say, leaving the defense of Obama's move to liberal allies such as the ACLU. One exception was Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., who heads his party's Senate campaign committee. He said the Arizona law "sets a dangerous precedent that puts even citizens and lawful residents at risk of racial profiling."

Matt Bennett, vice president of the Democratic-leaning group Third Way, said Republicans might get some short-term gain from criticizing Obama's decision, "but in the end, they are taking a simplistic approach to a complex issue."

Polls reflect the issue's complexity, Bennett said. They show strong support for controlling immigration, including support for Arizona's new law. But they also find significant support for an "earned path to citizenship" for illegal immigrants already here.

Americans who are most likely to make immigration a top voting priority, Bennett said, tend to live or work in places "profoundly affected by immigration."

Tags:
2010 Congressional elections,
John McCain,
Associated Press,
Mitch McConnell,
Congress,
John Boehner,
Robert Menendez

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Because Latinos as a voting bloc are more loyal to their race than to America and corrupt on illegal entry is not really a good reason for the Republicans to pander to them.

Welcome to the new decadent America where there is not enough pride to even object to an invasion.

Linda Re of LA 11:24AM July 07, 2010

Please note the last 2 paragraphs of this article. Hispanic Caucus sounds like it might lean 1 way in the debate. If what they or the white house believe what they say.

Why cant the border be secured 1st. Reason it leaves it open for more to rush in and collect the benifits of regular legal imigrants who waited thier turn and paid taxes. For a country to allow people who are illegaly here to even protest without reprisals is absurd. Why cant the laws in effect be enforced not even the President has a right to bypass the law or even to advise others to ignore it.

Until the law is changed the enforcement of it is the Federal Govts responsibilty. However they file a frivilous lawsuit. If what they say is only the Federal Govt can enforce Federal Law better sware in the entire law enforcement community.

How many arrest have been made which are felonies does it require a federal officer of course not. Get serious

As the Gov. of AZ stated Mr President do your job. That does not mean blam Bush.nt

jerry of NY 10:41AM July 07, 2010

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos