House Passes Campaign Finance Disclose Act

The bill includes a provision to exempt large organizations like the NRA

June 25, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (23)

The House passed campaign finance legislation known as the Disclose Act Thursday, despite controversy last week over the bill's exempting some large organizations like the National Rifle Association. [See who gets the most from gun rights groups.]

After a January Supreme Court decision allowing corporations and unions to spend unlimited amounts of money sponsoring campaign ads, Democrats crafted legislation in both chambers that would require stricter methods of campaign finance disclosure.

Rep. Chris Van Hollen led the House version of the bill, which requires special interest group officials to physically appear at the end of campaign ads they sponsor, acknowledging who contributes to their campaign fund, and to disclose their campaign related expenditures on their websites.

It also prohibits foreign controlled corporations from contributing to political campaigns.

The bill passed 219 to 206 in the House. Only two Republicans, Reps. Anh "Joseph" Cao and Michael Castle voted in favor of the bill. [See who is giving money to Cao's campaign.]

The bill has come under fire recently for carve-outs. In response to pressure from the NRA, House Democrats made an amendment last week to exempt organizations that have over 1 million members, have been in existence for at least a decade, and receive less than 15 percent of their funding from corporations.

House Minority Leader John Boehner said in a statement, "This bill would muzzle small businesses but protect labor unions…This is a backroom deal to shred our Constitution for raw, ugly, partisan gain."

The Chamber of Commerce, which has been avidly opposing the legislation, said the "Democratic majority in the House has jammed through a piece of legislation that clearly violates the Constitution, as well as basic principles of fairness and equity."

Other groups, like the Campaign Legal Center have been urging the bill to be passed, despite the NRA exemptions. The CLC's Policy Director Meredith McGehee said, "The Disclose Act, while not perfect, is a clear improvement over current law which was left in tatters by the recent decision of the Roberts Court."

The bill will now go to the Senate, where Sens. Chuck Schumer and Russ Feingold are leading the efforts to pass it.

 

Tags:
Russ Feingold,
Chris Van Hollen,
Mike Castle,
Joseph Cao,
Congress,
Chuck Schumer

Reader Comments Read all comments (23)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Hey, GOP-paid Industry Front-Group Propaganda Man of CA,

The only one with a NEW Yacht is your boy Kerry in MA who docked it in RI to avoid paying taxes on it in his home state. Apparently only the little people pay taxes.

And, why is it that the SEIU spent 60 million dollars on Obama's 2008 campaign, yet corporations are deemed evil and influencial to elections??? What do you suppose Andy Stern at the SEIU bought with his 60 million dollars stolen from his union members??? THAt was a whole lot of special interest.

YOu people will over look that "little" contribution while at the same time scream about the 1 million that the NRA gave the Bush Campaign in 2000.

You're all such hypocrites and so blind to the truth of what is really going on out there!!!!!!!!!

ANDY of NC 9:38AM July 27, 2010

Stinky stuff...backroom deals and "compromise".

I hate to break it to you, but bills and the subsequent laws are for the most part today, created and passed regardless of party affiliation, in just this matter. It's not a good thing...but it is reality. And if you don't like that, you should, in fact, be SUPPORTIVE of this bill as it promotes transparency and tries to dispense with conflicts of interest and foreign influence into our elections.

Let's be clear on the point of this bill shall we?

""To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit foreign influence in Federal elections, to prohibit government contractors from making expenditures with respect to such elections, and to establish additional disclosure requirements with respect to spending in such elections, and for other purposes.""

God, that just sounds awful!!!

Shame on you CoC for becoming another extension of our divided politics. Shame on you.

William of IA 5:16PM July 15, 2010

Specifically exempts unions and the NRA. Nevermind that it requires affected groups to turn over membership lists. Sounds like a way to target "subversives".

And if you think those membership lists won't be used for federal or union reprisal campaigns, you're a bigger fool than the idiots who passed this.

Joseph Gerth of TX 6:12PM July 02, 2010

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos