Will Cost of Afghanistan War Become a 2010 Campaign Issue?

The president has promised to withdraw U.S. troops in July 2011, but conditions may not permit it

June 11, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

With his December decision to send 30,000 additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan, President Obama made the war his own. And what a war it has become: The U.S. military marked a grim milestone in Afghanistan this year with more than 1,000 U.S. soldiers killed there since October 2001. Roadside bombings are on the rise, causing double the number of fatalities in 2009 that they did in 2008. And 2010 is on track to be even worse by that measure.

[See a slide show of 5 key issues in the 2010 elections]

While Afghanistan has faded from the public consciousness in the wake of economic collapse and healthcare reform, this summer promises to put it back on the front pages. As the last of Obama's surge troops arrive on the ground in Afghanistan, most in the volatile south, the Pentagon has made no secret of the fact that it is planning a major offensive. The target will be Kandahar, the spiritual heartland of the Taliban, and senior U.S. military officials have already told members of Congress to brace their constituents for a tough period of fighting, with more casualties.

As troops surge, of course, so too does the cost of the war. The price tag for Afghanistan alone is more than $300 billion to date, with another $100 billion expected to be spent in 2010, according to the Obama administration's supplemental budget request. The president has promised to begin withdrawing U.S. troops by July 2011, conditions permitting. But U.S. military officials currently engaged in a brutal war against a committed network of Taliban insurgents warn that, indeed, conditions may not permit.

As the midterm elections approach, the fiscal cost of war in Afghanistan may draw the ire of a public increasingly mobilized against government spending—and of those, too, weary of the human toll of war.

Tags:
War in Afghanistan (2001-),
Afghanistan,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It really would be nice if voting Americans decided we spend far too much on Afghanistan, because we do. We also spend far too much on the general projection of American power into other distant places--hundreds of them in fact. Our self-appointed role as hegemon in a recalcitrant world is costly. Now that we're the world's largest debtor nation, it's also pretty foolish.

Voters are entitled to know the total dollars spent annually on the combination of national defense, homeland security, nation building, foreign aid designed to gain the cooperation of other countries, and veteran affairs. If they did, they'd bring a little disgust with them to the voting booth. It's no wonder the total dollars aren't common knowledge.

Ron W. Smith of UT 4:14PM June 14, 2010

Obama is so terribly inexperienced that he is screwing up everything his progressive elitist brain touches upon:

-Healthcare

-Stimulus Bill

-Lack of job creation

-Poor handling of oil spill

-Fiscally irresponsible

-Auto industry bailout

-Talk of gas tax to fund oil spill

-Cap and trade

-Vat tax discussions

-Wasting jet fuel flying around the country for political reasons

=Lying everytime he opens his mouth

-Broken all of his campaign promises

-Tossing Israel under the bus

-etc., etc., etc.

Vote hom out in 2012 and his fawning minions in 2010.

Fed Up of IN 3:45PM June 14, 2010

Photo Galleries

Women on Death Row

Only 12 women have been executed on death row in the U.S. since 1976.

advertisement

Latest Videos