Gulf Oil Spill Could Spur Energy Bill

Polls show new interest from voters in tackling carbon pollution

June 11, 2010 RSS Feed Print

It's hard to remember, but before Congress got all bogged down with healthcare reform last summer, the House had passed a major piece of energy and climate legislation that would have capped greenhouse gas emissions and put billions into renewable energy and new technologies. The Senate tried to get something going last fall, but the effort stalled. Then the Copenhagen climate summit came and went and, by the start of the year, climate legislation seemed no further along in the Senate than it did when President Obama took office.

[See a slide show of 5 key issues in the 2010 elections]

The story didn't change much this spring . Three senators—one Democrat (John Kerry), one independent (Joe Lieberman), and one Republican (Lindsey Graham)— put together an energy and climate plan after months of closed-door meetings, but Graham pulled his support once Senate Democrats began talking about taking up immigration. The hope had been to come up with something that might quiet some of the rhetoric from both sides and have a shot at passing the Senate. But in an election year, that's a hard task. As with healthcare, opponents are branding any attempts to rein in carbon pollution as a tax, whereas proponents are promising that curbing emissions will galvanize the economy and create new jobs.

It wasn't until the massive Gulf oil spill, at the end of April, that President Obama began pushing publicly once again for an energy and climate bill. The public, it seems, is with him: Several recent polls have shown that, in the aftermath of the spill, a strong majority of Americans support action to tackle carbon pollution and to spur more renewable energy. But so far, Congress hasn't been able, or simply hasn't found the will to try, to translate voter sentiment into legislation.

All the same, it's unlikely that energy issues will rank as high in voters' minds this year as they did in 2008, when gas prices were soaring above $4 a gallon. Prices have been creeping up this spring, but they're still well below the records that were set two years ago. And while most polls show that Americans continue to support developing renewable energy and think capping pollution is a good idea, they also show that fewer Americans now believe global warming is an urgent problem that needs to be addressed.

 

Tags:
John Kerry,
Lindsey Graham,
BP,
Joe Lieberman,
Congress

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

What is beyond revolting is that, while we are facing the oil spill crisis, Obama and his comrades are busy using the crisis to push their cap and trade/carbon tax SCAM down our throats!

Rather than finding ways to solve the oil spill horrendous problems, they are busy finding ways to use those problems and the suffering they are creating to advance their SCAM!

AntonioSosa of FL 12:50PM June 14, 2010

Steffy: U.S. and BP slow to accept Dutch expertise

LOREN STEFFY

Houston Chronicle

June 8, 2010

"Three days after the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico, the Dutch government offered to help.

It was willing to provide ships outfitted with oil-skimming booms, and it proposed a plan for building sand barriers to protect sensitive marshlands.

The response from the Obama administration and BP, which are coordinating the cleanup: “The embassy got a nice letter from the administration that said, ‘Thanks, but no thanks,'” said Geert Visser, consul general for the Netherlands in Houston.

Now, almost seven weeks later, as the oil spewing from the battered well spreads across the Gulf and soils pristine beaches and coastline, BP and our government have reconsidered.

U.S. ships are being outfitted this week with four pairs of the skimming booms airlifted from the Netherlands and should be deployed within days. Each pair can process 5 million gallons of water a day, removing 20,000 tons of oil and sludge.

At that rate, how much more oil could have been removed from the Gulf during the past month?"

Cont'd.........

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/steffy/7043272.html

Sue McDowell of AZ 2:59PM June 13, 2010

Cap and trade legislation is a scam. It always has been too. The only reason our President is pushing this legislation through is to distract Americans from seeing all his mishaps during the Oil spill. He's trying to politicize this accident when what he should be doing is taking up the Dutches offer to use their boes, which could have taken at least 20,000 gallons of the oil (in the first three days) out of the ocean and it could have continued to do so every day. Other private industries have offerred this to the President and he has turned this down. It's almost as if he wants this incident to get worse so that he can push through this Cap and Trade legislation that he as well as other Democrat members have been wanting to do for a long time now, but have gotten very little support from the general public. I'm sorry, I respect my President, but his actions during this spill have been really irresponsible. If we passed the Cap and Trade bill, another 1/6 of the private sectors wealth would adminstered into the government's hand. And they'd always have control over that money. Also, the bill will tax fossil and fuel companies, almost bankrupting this businesses. This would affect every area of life too. Farmers for example use fossil and fuel machinery to produce their crops. It is true that we have alternative green technology, but the problem with this is that the green technology can not produce the same mass amount of goods that fossil and fuel machinery can so farmers will lose out on money and it will affect the general public because they'll have to raise their prices to make up for the loss of goods they were unable to produce. This will effect every area-milk, poultry, fruits, vegetables even electricity as electricity runs on fossil fuel. This could potentially bankrupt the fossil fuel industry could would affect our over all industry production and our jobs imparticlarly with the middle class. Read up on the Industrial Revolution. Before the Industrial Revolution, there was the poor and the really rich and the rich had all the money. After the industrial revolution, the middle class was born, which shifted the wealth of the elitest into the average man's hands because they were able to accumulate their own wealth and pave out their own destinies. It is true that whoever holds the majority of the money, controls your country. That principle still rings true today. Please read up on the Industrial Revolution. What life was like before it and after it and why we do need our industry. It's directly linked with our middle class, which is the backbone of this country. Austraila was going to pass this bill a couple of years ago and many people were concerned that the bill was going to severely hurt the middle class, almost wiping them out...seriously. Research it. This is a scam. Please research this.

Grace of NE 6:10PM June 12, 2010

Photo Galleries

All the World's a Carnival

See spectacular images from carnival celebrations.

advertisement

Latest Video