Senators Press for National Guard Troops on Border

May 20, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

WASHINGTON  — Homeland Security and Pentagon officials are at loggerheads over a plan to send National Guard troops to the U.S.-Mexico border, even as President Barack Obama is pledging to bolster security there.

The Guard stalemate has festered for nearly a year, and frustrated lawmakers are demanding action to stem the spread of violence and drug trafficking that has spilled across the border into their states. The inaction raises questions about whether the White House is convinced the federally funded deployment is necessary, or whether border states will be forced to bear the costs of dispatching the Guard troops on their own.

Speaking at the White House on Wednesday with Mexican President Felipe Calderon, Obama said the U.S. is committed to standing with Mexico against the drug cartels.

"As your partner, we'll give you the support you need to prevail," he said, adding that through increased law enforcement on the U.S. side of the border, "we're putting unprecedented pressure on those who traffic in drugs, guns and people."

Fueling the discord over sending the National Guard to the border was the U.S. response to the Gulf oil spill, which has included federal authorization for deploying up to 17,000 National Guard troops.

Those costs, however, are likely to be borne by oil giant BP PLC, which leased the offshore drilling rig Deepwater Horizon that exploded off the Louisiana coast April 20, killing 11 and releasing a huge, continuing oil spill.

The oil spill notwithstanding, border state lawmakers say they need help too.

"If you'll indulge me, we think we have another crisis on the border," Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., told Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano at a hearing this week. "I want to know about whether you're going to send the Guard to the border or not."

When she tried to explain other DHS improvements along the border, McCain cut her off.

"People's homes are being violated, and their families can't take kids to the bus stop," the senator fumed. "And you are very familiar with the issue, because you yourself asked for the Guard to go to the border back in 2006."

Napolitano, a former Arizona governor, responded that the request involves the White House as well as the Pentagon and the Homeland Security Department, and is still in the interagency process. While she said she would like the decision to be made as soon as possible, she added she could not say when she would have an answer.

"We don't have a resolution on that yet," Air Force Gen. Gene Renuart said in an interview with The Associated Press. Renuart, who headed the U.S. Northern Command until his retirement Wednesday after 39 years of service, added that while money is a point of contention, the greater disagreement centers on what missions the National Guard would perform.

He said the discussion between the Defense and Homeland Security departments continues, and some of the requests "have evolved a bit in this interim period." He did not provide details.

First floated last June, the idea was to use 1,500 Guard troops temporarily to supplement border patrol agents. The Pentagon and Homeland Security drafted a $225 million plan, but disagreed over who would pay for it and how the troops would be utilized.

Pentagon officials, worried about perceptions that the U.S. was militarizing the border, argued that the Guard could only be used for particular duties. Military leaders said they did not want Guard troops to screen vehicles at border points or perform any law enforcement duties, and said the program should be temporary and not tied to any existing program that could get extended.

Defense officials have said that possible missions for the Guard soldiers could include surveillance along the border, intelligence analysis, helicopter transportation support and aviation surveillance, which likely would involve unmanned aircraft.

In a letter to Obama this week, McCain and Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., said sending at least 6,000 National Guard to the border — with half focused on the Arizona portion — would immediately improve the safety of Americans there.

Tags:
Jon Kyl,
Mexico,
Arizona,
John McCain,
Department of Homeland Security,
Congress,
Associated Press,
Pentagon,
Janet Napolitano

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

hey i did be for now wene in 06 to 07 now wene i im doing it agin but it will wat im im in iraq now

see(prom)

of 2:21PM July 13, 2010

I have been with the regular Navy, Naval Reserve, Air Force Reserve,Army Reserve and Army National Guard, until my disability while on Active Duty with the Guard. I have not quite twenty years cumulative service. As National Guardsmen and Guards women, we were prepared to act primarily for the governor of the state in which we affiliated with the Guard. However, we served the President at his request to activation, whereby, we were with the Regular Army.

Although I am way past the age limit, I am for the Guard patrolling the borders of the United States. I remember periods of unemployment when I volunteered to give medical support to Military Academies or other military components who needed someone.I mention this because there will be Guardsman and Guards Women who have family and jobs that are more important to them than to break the cohesion of the family and employment in peace time. War time is radically different, as they know their responsibility and obligation to defend the constitution, state of membership in the Guard, and the United States of America. It would not be necessary to activate whole units because of the volunteer aspect. Granted, there would be personnel from all over the United States to fill certain assignments, but because of the excellent training the Guard offers, it would make no difference, as the Guard is trained for functioning in War,and there would be minimal negative RESPONSE.

John E. Mago of MN 3:54PM May 20, 2010

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos