'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Debate Rages On in Congress

March 10, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (18)

Senior Pentagon officials say that Mullen had a sense that his remarks would be historic and, for this reason, put them in his opening statement. "He didn't want to wait to be asked" his opinion about "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," says a senior military official. "He feels very strongly about the integrity issue. He's really been thinking about this for a long time."

It is, of course, ultimately up to Congress whether to pass legislation repealing the ban, and Mullen's statement prompted some finger-wagging from Arizona Republican John McCain. The senator—who three years ago said that he would support a change in the policy "the day that the leadership of the military comes to me and says, 'Senator, we ought to change the policy' "—pronounced himself "deeply disappointed" in the military leader. "Your statement obviously is one which is clearly biased, without the view of Congress being taken into consideration."

Perhaps equally important will be the input offered by the heads of each of the military services, which will go some way toward shaping opinion on Capitol Hill, and it is an open secret in the halls of the Pentagon that there have been some differences of opinion among the joint chiefs. Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James Conway, for his part, has made it known that he thinks the current policy works well enough. He also intimated that he has considerable reservations about lifting the ban. "My personal opinion is that unless we can strip away the emotion, agenda, and politics and ask [whether] we somehow enhance the war fighting of the United States Marine Corps by allowing homosexuals to openly serve, then we haven't addressed it from the correct perspective," he told the House Armed Services Committee.

Yet there is a considerable measure of support for repeal of the ban within the ranks of the armed forces. A 2006 Zogby poll found that 73 percent of military personnel surveyed said they were comfortable serving with openly gay or lesbian troops. On the eve of the testimony last month, former Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs John Shalikashvili and Colin Powell, who previously opposed the move on the grounds that it would undermine discipline and order, expressed support for overturning the ban.

In the meantime, the Pentagon has launched a yearlong study of how such a step would be greeted by soldiers and their families and what it would entail. This includes considerations such as how it might affect recruiting and living arrangements and whether partners of gay soldiers would receive the free healthcare that spouses do. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said that even after the passage of a repeal by Congress, he would like an additional year for the Pentagon to implement it. "I expect our approach may cause some to wonder why it will take the better part of a year to accomplish the task," Gates conceded.

That has indeed been the case. Last week, Carl Levin, the Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, along with Sens. Joe Lieberman, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Arlen Specter, among others, introduced legislation to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" in an effort to accelerate the process. But pulling together enough votes to pass the bill could prove challenging, as was illustrated in a testy exchange during Mullen's Senate committee appearance. "If it was a trial, we would perhaps raise the 'undue command influence' defense," Sen. Jeff Sessions, an Alabama Republican, said to Mullen on the heels of his opening remarks. This prompted the chairman to shoot back an uncharacteristically terse response: "This is not about command influence," Mullen said. "This is about leadership."

Senate Democrats say that if legislation falters, they could include an amendment in the 2011 defense authorization to repeal the law, which would force the GOP to pull together 60 votes to remove it. In the meantime, Levin said he is exploring the possibility of instituting a "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" moratorium, to prevent more troops from being expelled under the policy, while the Pentagon conducts its review. 

Tags:
Arlen Specter,
LGBT rights,
Kirsten Gillibrand,
Joe Lieberman,
John McCain,
Carl Levin,
Jeff Sessions,
Congress,
national security terrorism and the military,
military

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

That fact that people even need to think about letting openly homosexual people serve! no one should have to even think about it, it should be allowed. its so sad to see that they cant even serve our country for their life choices. who the heck are we to say "no you can serve" because of who you love. i think thats awful. to deny someone their RIGHTS because of it is awful. we should all be ashamed of ourselves for this. they should be allowed to do the exact same things that heterosexuals can. its not like straight people can serve any better then a homosexual. but at the same time, i wouldnt serve for a country who denies them their rights to get married and receive benefits from their partner. there needs to be more accepting people in this world. its not ok to shun someone out of something because of the way other people might feel, how do you think homosexuals feel, did anyone think about that? i didnt think so.

Kayla of CA 11:34PM November 07, 2010

well i was in the army, and i honestly was never taunted or hated on and i was and am openly lesbian. though because i was open about being a lesbian and a soldier i was discharged, fully honorably for being so.i was a good soldier and didnt even come close to doing some of the idiotic things that other soldiers straight or gay did and to me i want back in but cannot because i am a lesbian and there is a code on my discharge papers that states a number 4 making it impossible for a recruiter to even try to get me back in. i know this because i tried...so if they do take away this ban, are those who were discharged for being so allowed back in and if i am i want to be treated the same as those who are heterosexually married, my partner deserves to recieve health insurance and housing while im overseas, my life is being risked the same as any other soldier. there are many many different things that need to be discussed before they figure out what they will do. but just so everyone out there who hasnt served knows, there are tons and tons of lesbians bi's and gays in the military already and for the most part i have never experienced or heard of another homosexual soldier getting taunted or feeling like they dont belong by there company or platoon. so for those that our currently serving congress needs to hurry up and benefit these soldiers for serving their country our country. our families matter the same and our lives are equal to others, no matter the sexual orientation.

cwinckler of AZ 3:19PM August 16, 2010

This argument is not about gays being in the military its about how straight people would feel with gays in the military. If OPEN! gays in the military can cause a threat to unit cohesion I dont feel like it is worth risking the lives of our good men and women over. If there are gay people who want to fight for this country great! but fight because u want to protect this country and dont bring sexual orientation into the military.

ryan of CA 2:18PM August 02, 2010

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos