Postmaster General Calls for Cuts to Postal Service

March 2, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (38)

When Postmaster General John Potter told U.S. News back in September that the best way to get the U.S. Postal Service back on its feet was to cut back service to five days, it seemed like a distant and not-too-pressing eventuality. But with the USPS on track to lose more than $7 billion next year and hundreds of billions more in the coming decade, Potter and the management team launched a reform campaign this week. It's designed to win support in Congress and among the public for shuttering post offices, raising postal rates, cutting home delivery service to five days a week, and shrinking staff.

The financial hole is so deep that a single strategy for balancing the books would be woefully inadequate, experts say. As a result, the USPS is pushing to make numerous cuts at the same time. A UPS review found that "revenue and mail volume projections point to a continuing and dramatic losses in the billions. If the Postal Service takes no action, it could face a $238 billion shortfall by the year 2020." The USPS lost $3.8 billion last year alone as mail volume fell 13 percent.

In addition to rising healthcare and retirement costs for employees, the prime driver of the cost overruns has been a the shift to electronic mail, a trend that has been evident for more than a decade. Five years ago, the postal service handled more than 200 billion pieces of mail, but the figure is projected to fall to about 150 billion pieces by 2020, the steepest volume decline on record.

Critics have long charged that the post office has been unwilling to face the realities that mail volume will not return to past levels and that the shift to electronic mail represents an existential threat to its business model. Potter rejected that criticism. "No one's at fault," he said Tuesday to a group of congressional and postal union officials. "Historically, you could set your watch by the volume of mail we received on a given day."

Shuttering post offices is a delicate business, perhaps because the mail service is one of the most trusted government institutions with voters. Congressional representatives in particular are loathe to see them vanish from their districts. Indeed, Congress scuttled a proposal last year to close thousands of low-performing post offices to reduce costs.

On Tuesday, Potter said that any closures will be balanced by expanded online and kiosk offerings in places like supermarkets, pharmacies, and other retailers. As to cutting Saturday delivery, "if 70 percent of the American population tells us in surveys that they can live with five-day delivery, we have to do it," Potter said. He said that any price increases, meanwhile, would not come before January 2011 and that they would be less than double-digit hikes. 

Tags:
Postal Service

Reader Comments Read all comments (38)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

just like the last post says. its all about me the post office is dead cause of the unions that it has to answer too. i use to work for them and it was the biggest waste of money i have ever seen. yes that would mean you would have to go out of your way to get your junk mail. but nothing is for free and dont think anyone owes anything you don't have to get a box. with e-mail and pay bill online you don't the post office anymore anywhy. even if you order something online fedx or usps would get your stuff to you. there is just so much waste in the post office its not even funny the workers will slow down so they can get overtime yes even with less mail the union tells poeple to slow down if you want your overtime. not only that there is like twice as many magament poeple that are just as bad. in the seattle ndc on one shift there is there like 10 surpisers on to watch maybe 110 workers that is the biggest joke in the world. now thats even the upper lvl magament which is even worse. so i say cut the funding and let them sink or swim.

shawn cossel of WA 6:34PM July 26, 2010

Is there still a legitimate need for the USPS to have exclusive rights to mail in the US? Why not privatize them completely, so that the unhelpful CS reps (such as the one who hung up on me while I was attempting to find a way to pick up a package despite the local office only being open in the middle of the work day) can be terminated.

It's been a long, long time since I have sent something via the USPS and pretty much the only thing that ever arrives is junk mail. Sometimes someone will mistakenly send me something via USPS and without fail it arrives damaged or becomes "missing", has happened in multiple states over a 10 year period.

Pretty sure any private company could do a better job with more accountability and higher accuracy.

JP of DC 9:27PM July 19, 2010

why doesn't the Postal Service switch to more fuel efficient vehic les, at least for local delivery? Vehicles in use seem dinosaurs: new small vehicles would have at least twice the fuel efficiency, and for a bulk vehicle purchase and the implied advertising, surely a car manufacturer would give a good price.

Frida of VA 4:00PM July 06, 2010

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos