Fort Hood Report Reveals Deeper Dilemma

Pentagon review focuses on the need for more military psychiatrists

January 29, 2010 RSS Feed Print

There were a couple of points that immediately stood out in the Pentagon's report on the shooting that left 13 dead and 43 wounded at Fort Hood in November. House Armed Services Committee Chairman Ike Skelton made note of them this month in the first of two congressional hearings on what went wrong. The most glaring detail was the disconnect between the glowing performance reports written by the supervisors of the alleged gunman, Army psychiatrist Maj. Nidal Hasan, and the records of his actual performance, which described him as unprofessional, erratic, and disturbing to both his colleagues and his patients. Equally alarming, Skelton noted, was that in cases where Hasan's troubling behavior was cited in his files, that information wasn't shared interdepartmentally. This, in turn, "leads to the bottom-line question," Skelton said. "Was a great deal overlooked because this was a medical person in a specialty in which there is a shortage?"

The answer—a resounding yes—is of little dispute among senior defense officials. The shortage of mental-health professionals in the military is well documented. Togo West, former secretary of the Army and of Veterans Affairs, cochaired the independent panel on the Fort Hood shooting and told Skelton that because the Army has too few psychiatrists to treat soldiers, some officers might have given Hasan a wink and a nod for promotion, rather than hold him back.

Hasan's superiors made sure that accounts of his troubling behavior did not follow him in performance reviews.. "Supervisors don't always know what they're dealing with," West told the Senate Armed Services committee last week. The Ft. Hoodlessons learned report notes that "some medical officers failed to apply appropriate judgment and standards of officership with respect to the alleged perpetrator." These officers might soon be facing disciplinary action.

The report and subsequent hearings highlight the considerable information-sharing gaps that still exist throughout the government, despite efforts aimed at correcting the rifts exposed in the wake of September 11. "How can a commander connect the dots," West wondered, "if he doesn't have the information?"

The report brings up other less frequently discussed issues as well, including the tricky prospect of clarifying "guidelines for religious accommodation" to "help commanders distinguish appropriate religious practices from those that might indicate a potential for violence or self-radicalization." It also raises concerns that have been circulating within the halls of the Pentagon about how the failure to reprimand Hasan for his behavior not only led to violence but also affected the caliber of clinical care that soldiers were getting. The review of the treatment that Hasan provided to patients remains classified, but the mere question has prompted soul-searching within the military about how to better support therapists who care for soldiers, to ensure that troops, in turn, are getting the help that they desperately need.

Tags:
Pentagon

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It's hard to address a problem when you're not allowed to use the terms that describe it.

In this way a problem can slip through the cracks of any organization. It seems that political correctness has blinded an entire system to something that should have been addressed.

It seems logical that the system needs overhaul and soon.

If blame is to be placed, then those in charge of establishing and promulgating a "correct think" policy in the mental health division of our military have something to answer to, too.

Let us hope that political correctness is speedily erased from the vocabulary of all those upon whom we count to keep our country safe.

Judy Starr of CT 7:06PM February 01, 2010

The military may be short of psychiatrists, but the real reason Major Hasan was tolerated is very simple. It can be summed up in two words: Political correctness. Any other explanation is more political correctness, an excuse or rationalization for tolerating the man's behavior and anti-American views.

I served in the Navy 21 years and I can tell you that worst possible thing you can be accused of is racism. Being accused, rightly or wrongly, of racism in the Armed Forces is a career killer that follows you every where. The men and officers supervising and working around Major Hasan would have been terrified of saying anything about him or his reamrks for fear of being labeled anti-Muslim or, worst, racist.

Racism should never be tolerated, but political correctness does not foster diversity. It divides people and it is a dangerous policy.

Does it surprise anyone that a 70 year old, blue eyed grandmother of Swedish descent is subject to the most intrusive search, but a 20-something year-old Muslim, African male is allowed to board an airlane with a bomb in his underwear?

jimonthebeach of FL 6:26PM February 01, 2010

There is one common thread that runs through all of the terrorist activities from 9/11 right on through the murders committed by the Islamic coward Hasan at Ft. Hood. That thread is ISLAM. It is a dirty ideology bent upon murdering each and every Christian, Jew and unbeliever and subjugating the world under the yoke of this fraud perpetrated on the world by a pedophile, murdering fabricator and liar.

Everyone of these Muslims should be removed from the Armed Forces so they will not be in a position to sneak up on unarmed men, women and children and shoot them to death.

If that is not to be the case, then Sec. of Defense Gates and the rest of the Armed Forces officers should be required to have a Muslim accompany him 24 hours each day to see what it is like to worry about being assassinated by someone who is supposed to be on your side.

Don Ror of TX 2:19PM February 01, 2010

advertisement

Latest Video