Chair Though,employment property building difficulty model internal enough sign only combination here settlement kind expectation cultural word late department boat fit able threat deep note run sorry may directly true identify choice lay award day congress step front labour illustrate horse side feel state expert cause theory characteristic total authority historical purpose initial window piece week note enough award likely than capital train cat light very kind chief publication son meaning guide metal agency silence achieve circumstance instrument his than ship since its colour attractive lead scientist reduce military trend drink advance article land answer further concern
Hotels Munsterof 4:03PM April 04, 2010
Here are some more facts that you would like to know!! (copy and paste the link in your browser) -> http://j.mp/36nZDJ
Janiceof MA5:48PM January 06, 2010
Profanity at the Helm of Diplomacy: The Moral Decay of Meles Zenawi
18 December 2009
Ginbot 7 Statement
Last week, during the UN's human rights review session on Ethiopia, the United States' Ambassador to the UN Human Rights Council, Douglas M. Griffiths stated that: “Independent observers have noted…that most senior government positions are overwhelmingly represented by one ethnicity”. This was a simple restatement of facts outlined in the State Department's Country Report on Ethiopia and by various international human rights organizations. In addition, Ginbot 7 has produced evidence that a single ethnic group occupies 58 out of the 62 top military positions. That the Ethiopian government practices rampant ethnic discrimination is incontrovertible
Prime Minister Meles Zenawi responded to the U.S. ambassador's comments by calling him an idiot - to quote - "I have not heard of such idiocy. But if it has occurred, it proves the idiocy of the person (the U.S. ambassador) in Geneva." For Ethiopians, Zenawi's remarks are par for the course. He is known to be habitually vitriolic and uncouth in his speeches to local audiences, while taking pains to appear the picture of civility to diplomats. This episode is yet another reminder to the West and its diplomats that Zenawi, beneath the thin veneer, remains a boorish dictator.
And the West should treat him as such. Eighteen years of dictatorship and failed Western diplomacy illustrate that coddling and quiet diplomacy is ineffective in Ethiopia. What is needed is firmness and directness - a language and approach appropriate to Zenawi. As bankrollers of the Zenawi dictatorship, Western governments have the right and leverage to dictate to Zenawi.
It is, unfortunately, true that many diplomats remain reticent to take Zenawi to task, cynically holding on to the adage that though Zenawi "may be an "s.o.b", he's our "s.o.b."
Ginbot 7 would like to remind them of the obvious diplomatic and foreign policy risks of such a short-sighted approach.
Ginbot 7, Movement for Justice, Freedom and Democracy
Zenawi’s Secret to Food Security: Selling Land and Begging for Food
December 10, 2009
The World Bank, the IMF and the Ethiopian regime annual development reports have highlighted on Ethiopia’s higher GDP growth rate over the past 10 years, yet the UN development index and other indices [Misery Index] that measure the well-being of people have declined both absolutely and relative to many other African countries. The paradox of acute poverty and declining well-being of Ethiopians is found in various parts of the country and is pervasive across demographic groups. Today, to millions of Ethiopians, the heralded GDP growth and the empty promise of joining middle income nations has turned sour as a growing famine once again is engulfing Ethiopia.
In the last 18 years, bilateral and unilateral aid sources have written off about half of Ethiopia’s foreign debt and have pumped more than 30 billion dollars to induce economic development in Ethiopia. In its effort to appease donor nations and keep the flow of foreign aid, the deceitful regime in Addis Ababa has displayed its aspiration to agricultural modernization that focuses on food security and rural development. In spite of the multi billion dollar aid packages and development rhetoric from Ethiopia’s ruling minority regime, rural life in Ethiopia hasn’t changed from what it was at the turn of the last century [˜ 85% of Ethiopians live in rural areas].
Since 1991, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have constantly urged the TPLF regime to liberalize the financial sector and change the country’s land tenure policy. In fact, most of the aid packages from these two international organizations were ear-marked towards the goal of economic liberalization and establishment of a free market economy. However, after 18 years of love affairs between the IMF and Zenawi’s regime, Ethiopia is one of the few countries in Africa that has not made progressive changes in its basic land policy while enjoying multi billion dollar aid packages in the name of liberalization.
The TPLF land policy has discouraged farmers from making long term investment on the land that they don’t own, and the resultant problems generated from the regime’s land policy have made it impossible for Ethiopian farmers to make use of productive agricultural technologies. Moreover, policies of ethnic federalism have limited the ability of farmers to access land in other regions.
Many research and scholarly studies show that land insecurity reduces the incentive to invest on land and limits the ability to transfer land. Moreover, empirical studies have also indicated that Ethiopia’s land policy is the single most important constraint to the nation’s agricultural development.
Over the last 18 years, many national and international organizations including Economic Commission for Africa's (ECA) have repeatedly warned the ruling regime in Ethiopia, that land tenure along with the issue of governance were the most urgent areas requiring institutional transformation in Ethiopia. However, Zenawi and his ruling party have ignored advices, recommendations and warnings and made Ethiopia a nation of poverty in the middle of plenty.
The TPLF regime, the very regime that boasts to have dismantled communism in Ethiopia, has deliberately kept the communist land policy of its predecessor. To make things worse, the regime has eliminated the possibility of flexible application of policy by enshrining land policy in the constitution.
Today, to cover up its failed economic polices, Zenawi’s regime has adopted yet another perilous land policy that may have far reaching adverse consequences in the future food security of Ethiopia. A regime that has been parsimonious over the years to its own citizens has recently set aside over three million hectare of fertile land for foreign investors and governments that outsource farming to Ethiopia.
Ginbot 7 is extremely troubled by the scale and pace of the land grab in Ethiopia and has expressed its discontent to Ethiopians and to the international community. Ginbot 7 strongly opposes these secretive land deals that are being struck without the input of the Ethiopian people by an illegitimate regime. We believe that, instead of selling the nation’s fertile land and begging for food aid, the TPLF regime has to change its communist land policy and empower local farmers who have the potential to produce marketable surplus.
Ginbot 7 wants to send an unequivocal message to the land grabbers that any land deal that has not been agreed to by the Ethiopian people will not be honored by future elected governments.
Read the fine print! If the bill is enacted in its present Senate form,there are provisions to delay or not enforce any provisions that include no preexisting conditions and restricting lifetime and/or annual coverage. The solutios are making the insurance industry conform to the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, stop delaying certain provisions like the exchanges four or five year, changing the delay to a period not exceeding 90 days from the date of enacting, prohibiting frivolous lawsuits against doctors who have to defend themselves with authorizing unneccessary tests, putting the remaining TARP money toward Medicare (stop bailing out the big banks and break up AIG, Freddie Mac and Fannie May)and finally giving all 47M uninsured the opportunity to opt-into FEHBP, of which Us postal retirees and members of Congress and the Senators pay into. A form of the public optionn will sweeten the deal,but putting the insurance industry under Sherman would be most effective in preventing big insurance from screwing the public. Forcing people to buy private health insurance will only cause resentment.
Jack Goldingof KS3:47PM December 31, 2009
If we don't save medicare by extending it as an option to those who are not elderly, it eventually will go bankrupt or will bankrupt our seniors if we raise their premiums and increase their co-payments and deductibles. Private medical insurance companies are totally capable of treating their customers right if they have the incentive to do so. They have consistently tried to delay claims and even tried to get out of paying them at all by coming up with excuses like you might have other insurance, even at a time when so many Americans don't have any. The information about insurance is gathered by the hospital clerk who has already verified in writing on a form the patient signs that there is no other insurance policy before the treatment even begins; therefore, there is no excuse for this whatsoever. Just as my senator told me in writing, the private medical insurance companies need a NATIONAL health care insurance option that provides quality service to give them incentive to treat their customers well and provide prompt, hassle-free coverage for claims without fraudulent attempts to avoid and/or delay paying them.
There are 3 very obvious reasons expanding Medicare is non-negotiable. 1) In order to save Medicare permanently from bankruptcy by expanding it to those who are not elderly,rather than causing very avoidable, very serious health care problems for seniors. Many seniors are already going with less care than medically ideal because they cannot even afford the present deductibles and co-payments. 2) To give the private health insurance companies the incentive to pay claims and pay them promptly without any fraudulent hassle by providing a true competitor who will do this--Medicare for all. 3) To prevent our physicians from justifiably losing their temper and not being able to bear any longer dealing with the stressful hassles of collecting payment from medical insurance. We need to listen to the huge and growing number of Physicians For a National Health Care Plan. THE LONGER WE DO NOT LISTEN TO OUR DOCTORS, THE MORE WE STRESS THEM OUT AND THE MORE WE RISK LOSING THEM TO OTHER COUNTRIES WHO WILL TREAT THEM BETTER.
Sharla Whiteof OH12:01AM December 27, 2009
does this bill charge smokers more for their health care than non smokers? How about charging non exercisers more than exercisers? What about charging obese more than non obese persons?
Robb Campbell MD MPHof MN5:15PM December 26, 2009
If you really want to know what is wrong with American health care and why it's costs are so high, just watch your television! How many attorney are advertising to sue doctors and hospitals as well as employers? What is needed is tort reform. Stop frivolous lay suits! Make people responsible for their own actions. In the State of Florida a pregnant woman is not held responsible for her behavior during her pregnancy. So when the baby is born with a disability she is able to sure the doctor to help pay for the presumed future expenses and then if the mother is under a determined income level the child qualifies for Medicaid for life! Oh and by the way, after the age of 20 an individual on Medicaid must have medical procedures approved by a board.
Instead of battling over a woman's right to choose life or death for her unborn child, why not choose NOT to get pregnant in the first place? Contraceptives are much cheaper than abortions! Abortion is pure and simple infanticide. If it's not a human fetus then the woman's not pregnant! Since it is impossible for a woman to conceive and deliver any other animal naturally then the fetus IS a CHILD!
Barbaraof FL9:33AM December 26, 2009
RECENTLY CEDAR SINAI HOSPITAL IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA TRIED TO DISCIPLINE A NURSE THAT REFUSED TO PARTICIPATE IN AN ABORTION. ALLEGEDLY THE HOSPITAL IS BEING SUED OVER FORCING SOMEONE TO GO AGAINST THEIR CONSCIENCE. YET EVEN THOUGH THE HOSPITAL MAY HAVE FORCED OR TRY TO FORCE A PERSON TO GO AGAINST THEIR CONSCIENCE, THE HOSPITAL RECEIVED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS THROUGH ABORTION SUPPORTER SENATOR BOXER. SO HOW CAN A HOSPITAL THAT IS ALLEGEDLY DISCRIMINATING GETTING MILLIONS OF FEDERAL FUNDS? IS THIS A TASTE OF THE FUTURE BILL AND THE WAY THE HEALTH BILL WILL WORK IN THE FUTURE FORCING DOCTORS AND NURSES AND EVEN HOSPITALS TO GO ALONG WITH ABORTIONS EVEN THOUGH WE LIVE IN A FREE COUNTRY THAT RESPECTS THE RIGHT TO FOLLOW ONES OWN CONSCIENCE.
WILL DOCTORS AND NURSES BE FORCED TO OTHER THINGS AS WELL?
DOES A PERSON HAVE A RIGHT TO A LIVING WILL IN THIS LEGISLATION?
FRANK
FRANK OF CALIFORNIAof CA9:46PM December 25, 2009
Where is the tort reform? The health care system needs some adjustment not a 2,00 page bill. Why did some states get payoffs to get the bill passed?
Reader Comments
Back to article
Hotels Munster of 4:03PM April 04, 2010
Janice of MA 5:48PM January 06, 2010
wondesen hailemarayam of WA 3:06PM January 01, 2010
wondesen hailemarayam of WA 3:01PM January 01, 2010
Jack Golding of KS 3:47PM December 31, 2009
Sharla White of OH 12:01AM December 27, 2009
Robb Campbell MD MPH of MN 5:15PM December 26, 2009
Barbara of FL 9:33AM December 26, 2009
FRANK OF CALIFORNIA of CA 9:46PM December 25, 2009
Ron Flanders of PA 11:00AM December 25, 2009