Education Secretary Arne Duncan Says Merit Pay Should Be Tied to Student Growth

The education secretary tackles teacher pay, student performance, and principal training

December 15, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (22)

With billions in stimulus funding, Education Secretary Arne Duncan has more power to create change in the nation's schools than any of his predecessors. Before taking his current post, Duncan was CEO of the Chicago Public Schools. During his tenure there, reading and math scores set new records, and the number of high school students taking Advanced Placement courses more than tripled. Now he faces the challenge of prodding school districts around the country to improve student performance while local school budgets are tanking. U.S. News Senior Writer Kim Clark asked Duncan how leadership will help him reform American education in the midst of a recession. Listen to a podcast of this interview. Excerpts:

You're spending $5 billion on educational innovations at a time when states are slashing their budgets and firing teachers. How are you going to make sure that money isn't used just to maintain the status quo?

Rahm Emanuel, the president's chief of staff, has this great line: "Never waste a good crisis." We actually have two different crises here. One is educational, and the other, the toughest economy since the Depression. Sometimes the nexus of crisis and opportunity leads to the kind of dramatic reforms that we need, that frankly are more difficult to accomplish when times aren't so tough. So yes, it presents us with some real challenges. But what we are going to see is that this is a huge test of leadership. Some folks will be paralyzed by the challenges they are facing, and others will see this as a chance to fundamentally break through and challenge the status quo. And those are the type of leaders that we are going to invest in.

The great ideas always come locally, from great teachers and great principals. We want to take those good ideas to scale.

There's an argument that principals are the key to education reform: Better principals would hire better teachers and make teachers better. What are you doing to make principals better?

There are no high-performing schools without great principals. As a country we have absolutely underinvested in developing the next generation of great principals and really thinking about principal preparation and pipeline programs. We have to focus and put more resources behind principal leadership and development.

What qualities do you seek in principals that make them effective leaders? Principals today are CEOs. We have to treat them as such, and we have to train them as such. Principals have to be first and foremost instructional leaders. They have to be able to manage multimillion-dollar budgets. They have to be great in terms of HR. They have to work with the community. They have to be savvy with the media. We have to find those principals, and they are out there, those potential and future principals, and give them the range of skills and the range of training so that they can drive the kinds of dramatic change that we want.

The issue of merit pay for teachers is very controversial. A lot of people complain that basing merit pay on the scores of students just rewards teachers who happen to teach in rich districts. How can schools really measure student growth?

I am not a big believer in looking at absolute test scores. I think they tell you some things. There is a lot they don't tell you. I am a much bigger believer in looking at growth and gain and how much a student is improving each year. So, the more we can identify not just the teachers but the schools and the entire school districts that are accelerating student achievement and are accelerating student progress, those are the individuals and the teams and the schools and districts that we need to reward and shine a spotlight on, and most importantly learn from and replicate that success.

What techniques work to improve student performance in high school?

A couple things are of huge importance. First, making sure you have high expectations, that the work is very, very rigorous. We have to raise the bar. In far too many high schools, we've really dummied down expectations, and that actually increases student apathy. It doesn't increase success. It increases dropout rates.

Secondly, we have to build a culture in which every student, every teenager in high school, has an adult who they can go to in good times and bad who will be there for them. Having meaningful adult relationships is desperately important. Our high school students are looking for mentors.

Third, they want to understand what the relevance of their schoolwork to the world of work and the world of higher education. How we make those connections—from what we teach in the classroom to how the students understand how it will benefit them as they move on—is hugely important. When you see those things happen collectively and comprehensively, you see great outcomes for high school students.

We need to get the country into the business of turning around chronically underperforming schools. We are challenging everybody: states, and districts, and nonprofits, and unions and universities to think about turning around schools. We have some extraordinary examples of that around the country. But we don't begin to do it at scale or with the sense of urgency that we as a country need.

Some folks predict that you're going to have a hard time sticking to your guns about giving out only a few federal grants, and you'll have to give money to every single state to make friends. How you are going to be the leader who sticks to your guns on this?

Don't just listen to my words, watch my actions. I'm here for only one reason, and that is to help the country get dramatically better, and that is what we are going to do.

Tags:
Arne Duncan,
education

Reader Comments Read all comments (22)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The statement, "A lot of people complain that basing merit pay on the scores of students just rewards teachers who happen to teach in rich districts," needs some clarity. Merit pay encourages teachers, principals and administrators to cheat on tests and tests scores. I witnessed such unethical behavior from teachers who worked around me. I didn't cheat, but others did. My students' test scores were lower and didn't show the gains as students in other classrooms.

Trecia of TN 9:09AM August 02, 2011

Preface To Educational Reform & Merit pay…

Let’s ill-prepare our teachers in Instructional Science, let’s also have them going to school nights after long days for Master’s degrees and let’s have this challenge overlap with their 3-5 years as neophytes on the job. Oh, and let’s pay them very little while they have sinking debt from undergraduate and graduate degrees and in paying for a dependable car and a place to live and multiple insurances and of course saving while their young for when they grow old, and having a family before they grow too old. And, when they become nearly inured from being constantly observed and evaluated based on the achievements of others, let’s complete the denigration by offering them tenure, or security in a profession that does not offer merit-based pay nor a ladder to better status. Go, be happy and remain energized doing at age 63, make that 67, what you use to do at 22.

Oh, but we already are doing these things, and topping it all off with further reminders of the lowly status of being just a teacher by relabeling school administrators who once served teachers as knighted Educational Leaders. And let’s welcome in parents and Educational Reformers with bizarre and often strident ideological stances to more fully scrutinize every teacher’s every move. The narratives surrounding educational issues are controlled by politicians and self-serving foundations with naïve agendas (try emailing a foundation; they will send you any of their “white papers” FREE, but will not let you post back anything to them or their audience).

It does not have to be this way, but those of us caught up in labyrinthine conditions are often the most difficult to rally against their oppressors; doing so requires rising above “cognitive dissonance” or the tendency to over-value something that requires so much from us.

Should you not find sense in the current state of affairs join me in mounting Teacher-based educational reforms. There are two that I believe deserve your attention and comment. One would be to fix a fundamental problem in which all of us are complicit: the need to forge a standard curriculum of Best Instructional Practices. There is no consensus on just what constitutes Teacher Preparation, what teachers are taught about teaching can vary greatly from one professor to another; nonetheless, Teachers are increasingly accountable for student learning even while Schools of Education and State Departments have yet to identify the specific tools that you should know and master. (You may wish to see one effort to generate movement in this direction at: http://bestmethodsofinstruction.com/.)

In a manner of speaking there can be such a thing as Teacher Education until a core curriculum has been hammered out. Secondly, anyone who has ever taught knows that to do it right also makes it physically and emotionally draining. As currently understood schools are expected to do essentially three things every day: teach new concepts, conte

Anthony V. Manzo of CA 7:51PM March 02, 2010

How many special education teachers will qualify for merit pay? I have traumatic brain injury students, cognitively impaired, and emotionally impaired students. Sometimes the growth isn't an educational one but social gains. I teach the curriculum but within that curriculum I work on developing social skills and behavior modification. So many schools have cut back on counselors and social workers. If I as a teacher don't address this area, who does? I worry that merit pay will create a backlash against special eduation students. In Michigan, we have already seen many teachers angry about how the special education students bring down the ACT and MME scores.

Janis Shinn of MI 9:18AM February 04, 2010

Photo Galleries

Women on Death Row

Only 12 women have been executed on death row in the U.S. since 1976.

advertisement

Latest Videos