Gitmo 9/11 Suspects Heading to N.Y. Trial

November 13, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)
Accused Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed will be sent to New York to face trial in a civilian federal court.

Accused Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed will be sent to New York to face trial in a civilian federal court.

By DEVLIN BARRETT
Associated Press Writer

Self-proclaimed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other Guantanamo Bay detainees will be sent to New York for trial in a civilian federal court and prosecutors expect to seek the death penalty, Attorney General Eric Holder said Friday.

At a news conference, the attorney general said five other suspects, including a major suspect in the bombing of the USS Cole, Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, will be tried before a military commission.

Holder said the detainees in the New York case will be tried in a courthouse just blocks from where the Sept. 11 attackers felled the twin towers. Bringing such notorious suspects to U.S. soil to face trial is a key step in President Barack Obama's plan to close the terror suspect detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Obama initially planned to close the detention center by Jan. 22, but the administration is no longer expected to meet that deadline.

"For over 200 years our nation has relied upon a faithful adherence to the rule of law," Holder told a news conference at the Justice Department. "Once again, we will ask our legal system in two venues to answer that call."

The plan that Holder outlined Friday is a major legal and political test of Obama's overall approach to terrorism. If the case suffers legal setbacks, the administration will face second-guessing from those who never wanted it in a civilian courtroom. And if lawmakers get upset about terrorists being brought to their home regions, they may fight back against other parts of Obama's agenda.

"This is definitely a seismic shift in how we're approaching the war on al-Qaida," said Glenn Sulmasy, a law professor at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy who has written a book on national security justice. "It's certainly surprising that the five masterminds, if you will, of the attacks on the United States will be tried in traditional, open federal courts."

The New York case may force the court system to confront a host of difficult legal issues surrounding counterterrorism programs begun after the 2001 attacks, including the harsh interrogation techniques once used on some of the suspects while in CIA custody. The most severe method — waterboarding, or simulated drowning — was used on Mohammed 183 times in 2003, before the practice was banned.

Tags:
courts,
9/11,
Associated Press,
Guantánamo Bay

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

During the Civil War, captured confederates were held without trial as military combatants and not released so they could not return to fight Union soldiers. These men were American citizens and denied due process. Nazis captured during World War II were also held as military combatants. Why should terrorists who were captured by US armed forces in military actions be treated any differently?

The terrorists abhor our nation, it's people and our way of life. Our justice system was created to protect the rights and liberties of all citizens-even those of the accused. A trial of terrorists would only become a mockery of our justice system and a platform from which terrorists could further spew forth accusations against the United States.

Leave the terrorists in Cuba where they have no prospect of escape or killing any more of our citizens and no audience to listen to them. They made the choice to plot against and attack the United States-leave them there-for our safety.

Let's focus our efforts on protecting the safety of Americans and ending the terrorist threat- not on giving them a platform to air their grievances because we don't care about what they have to say anymore than they want to listen to what we have us.

mvanhecke of MI 5:34PM November 29, 2009

This is unbelievable. We are going to bring these guys on our shores, give them all our constitutional rights and somehow in all this we think "justice" is being done? Terrorism is not a "crime" it is an act of war and terrorists are not criminals, they are combatants. Why reward them with civil courts? Give them military tribunals, quick appeals, then hang them all within one year. Absolutely unbelievable.

We will lose the war in Afghanistan because we want everyone to play fair, and we can't defend OURSEVLES from this because the local government may or is corrupt. If THAT is our dividing line, then all these terrorists will be safe to attack us again and again and again.

Time to impeach Obama for failing to defend this Country.

R Mason of OH 3:54PM November 13, 2009

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos