California Voters Sharply Divided Over the Prop 8 Same-Sex Marriage Ban

March 10, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (31)

SAN FRANCISCO—Less than a week after a majority of justices on the California Supreme Court appeared poised to uphold Proposition 8, the initiative that eliminated same-sex marriage in this state, a new poll finds voters sharply divided over the likely next step: A proposed constitutional amendment that would reverse Proposition 8 and restore same-sex marriage.

After their defeat at the ballot box in November, gay rights groups promised to put a new initiative on the ballot if the court ruled against them—something many analysts consider likely after the justices' cool reception during oral arguments on the legality of Proposition 8 last week. The court has 90 days to determine if the initiative is a legitimate amendment. California law requires only a bare majority to amend the state Constitution.

According to a Field Poll released today, the first to ask voters how they would react if same-sex marriage finds its way back onto the ballot, gay rights groups might not have the support they need. While 52 percent of voters supported Proposition 8 in the fall, the poll finds that 48 percent of registered voters say they would vote to amend the Constitution to allow gays and lesbians to marry, while 47 percent said they would vote against it. Five percent of voters say they are undecided.

The poll's demographic breakdown is remarkably similar to the vote on Proposition 8: Almost 65 percent of Democrats say they would support an amendment restoring same-sex marriage in the state, while 70 percent of Republicans say they would oppose it. Voters in San Francisco and Los Angeles County overwhelmingly line up on the side of same-sex marriage, with 64 percent of registered voters in the San Francisco Bay area saying they would vote in favor of an amendment. The state's more conservative Central Valley is just as strongly opposed to the idea, with 60 percent of voters saying they would vote against the amendment.

Men and women also are divided on the issue, with 52 percent of men opposing the potential ballot initiative and 53 percent of women supporting it.

As with Proposition 8, a generational gap also continues to split the state. Fifty-five percent of voters between 18 and 39 say they would support the amendment, while voters between 40 and 64 are only narrowly in favor. Two in three voters 65 or older say they would oppose the amendment.

Voters who know or work with gay or lesbian individuals, meanwhile, continue to strongly support same-sex marriage, with 56 percent saying they would vote for an amendment allowing same-sex couples to marry. Among voters who say they do not know any gays or lesbians, 66 percent say they would vote against the proposed amendment.

Tags:
LGBT rights,
Proposition 8,
San Francisco,
California,
marriage,
voters,
polls,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (31)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

You guys are so suprising. What ignorant bigoted idiots! Here's a suggestion to all the adults who believe in a magical sky god who looks like some white guy's grandfather. Heaven is the reward for your belief in this god of gods, right? If I tell you a way to fast track your way to heaven, WILL YOU GO THERE IMMEDIATELY SO THE REST OF THE ADULTS ON THIS PLANET WHO CAN THINK CRITICALLY ABOUT REALITY WILL BE ABLE TO PROMOTE HUMANUTY WITHOUT THE IMPEDIMENT OF YOUR FANTASY OF A CHILD'S MIND.

Here's some more food for thought for you brainwashed homophobes: OF THE PLACES ON EARTH THAT DO ALLOW GAY MARRIAGE NOT ONE OF THEM HAS REPORTED (1.)A RISE IN HIV INFECTION, (2.)A RISE IN INCESTUOUS PREGNANCY RATES, (3.)MORE HETEROSEXUAL DIVORCES, (4.)HETEROSEXUAL OR HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGES THAT HAVE ENDED BECAUSE OF DIVINE INTERVENTION VIA PUFF OF SMOKE OF SPONTANEOUS COMBUSTION, (5.)INCREASED DEATH, (6.)MORE REQUESTS FOR INDIVIDUALS TO MARRY ANY ANIMAL OF THEIR LIKING, (7.)etc., which means that the god you dpoke of ISN'T HERE AND NEVER WAS!

Did you see where I was going with the previous paragraph. None of the things you betterosexuals are afraid of are happening in the "wake" of gay marriage, so what are you guys really so afraid of. That your school children will be taught in school that homosexuality is ok? The American Psychiatric Association already tells the whole USA that Homosexuality is a non-pathological human variant, like have green eyes or skin color-an immuteable characteristic. We know what you are afraid of regarding your kids: THAT THEY WILL REALIZE THEIR PARENTS ARE INSECURE BIGOTS IGNORANT OF THE WORLD THEY HAVE BEEN CONVINCED THEY SHOULD FEAR. You fear that, like racists after segregration was made law, you will one day have to look at yourself in the mirror and admitt that you ARE homophobic, ignorant, bigoted, brainwashed idiots that time forgot.

Which is harder to do? Tell yourself that you know homosexuals pose no threat to yourself or anybody else you know and stop demonizing them out of fear and ignorance, or continue to promote discriminatory sentiments that we know do NOT come from loving expressions of concern for reality and future safety of others.

Everyone on this planet needs food, love, water, shelter. Why is it then that the only one of those four words that bears the "meaning" stamp is the one so many people who claim the love market, in "god's name", can not seem to intrinsically promote without strings attatched to what they are comfortable with.

David Kansas City of MO 7:16PM March 12, 2009

old testament scripture whether jewish or christian says of a certain male "a man of sorrows,and a friend of grief".

Jesus of Nazareth claimed this passage as portraying Himself.

He personally expressed his view that "God created them male and female,therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife and the two shall become one,therefore whom God has joined together let no one put asunder".So how gay was Jesus whether in his lifestyle or personal beliefs?

whether we believe in Him as God incarnated in human form or as the sacrifice atoning for all sinners or just a good person who died and his corpse was never found,it is very clear what he taught about marriage and those who were candidates for it,namely one male and one female,not this modern word "partners" which is a nondescript term paving the way for what is now the obvious pathway mankind is determining to pursue.where is the love in sticking your finger up someone elses nose? and this subject is not about noses or fingers.Think about it please.

allan lambert 10:08AM March 12, 2009

You can't base a marriage on a sex-act! Marriage is a union in holy matrimony, and a sharing of love, honor, fidelity, commitment and responsibility between a man and a woman, period! Anything else is just sex, irregardless of whether it is between 2 men or two women. If you want to be gay because it's fun or gets a rise out of everyone else or whatever, fine, go do it elsewhere and more power to you. But not around me. I am straight as an arrow, and always will be. Just don't try to force your homosexuality on me or my society openly and flaunt it in front of my family, or force our schools to teach it to my children. You want straight people to keep our noses out of your "business", fine; but quit trying to make it our business byt wearing on your sleeve. If you want to say whatever you wish without regard for everyone else (or at lesast the majority), fine. Well, here's my "freedom of speech", also...SHUT UP!

Jim in Hancock, MI of MI 11:51PM March 11, 2009

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos