The Republican Party Looks to Repair Its Image

Michael Steele and the rest of the GOP are in a fix in the Obama era

March 3, 2009 RSS Feed Print

In the Obama era, the Republicans are in a fix. At the congressional level, they are going back to basics, serving notice that they will continue to oppose the president on matters of conservative orthodoxy, from his vast spending plans to his goal of expanding the power of the federal government. But at the same time, after losses in the elections of 2006 and 2008, they are trying to put a fresher, more appealing face on the GOP.

Their troubled brand, which one former adviser to presidential candidate John McCain called "the southern white man's party," prompted Republican leaders to choose Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, the son of Indian immigrants, to deliver the GOP response to President Obama's prime-time address this week. Jindal, who at 37 is one of the nation's youngest governors, is considered a possible presidential candidate in 2012. Jindal said that the GOP had lost its way by straying from the ideals of limited government and fiscal discipline. He said that the answer to the nation's economic problems isn't to give more power and money to the federal government. "The way to lead," he argued, "is by empowering you, the American people, because we believe that Americans can do anything." He said the Democratic majority in Congress has been "irresponsible" in passing legislation that spends "money we do not have on things we do not need." Jindal's speech was panned by media critics, but his views are widely shared by Republicans in the House and Senate and emphasized by the new party chairman.

"We spent the last two election cycles in the political desert, where we wandered aimlessly from message to message," says Michael Steele, the head of the Republican National Committee. "We forgot those core ideals" that had led to success in the past, such as fiscal discipline, shrinking the size of government, and personal responsibility. "We walked away from the trust of the American people," he says. Steele pledged to not back down from confronting Obama and the Democrats on "basic principles."

The latest area of contention is Obama's budget proposal, especially his plan to limit the deductions that the wealthy can itemize on their tax returns in order to help pay for his overhaul of the healthcare system. During the campaign, Obama also pledged to end the income-tax cuts for the upper brackets enacted under President George W. Bush. Many conservatives call this "class warfare." Obama also wants to use revenue from his cap-and-trade environmental program, in which companies would buy permits in order to exceed pollution limits, to finance a tax break for low- and middle-income people.

All this is likely to push many Republicans into battle against what they say are Democratic schemes for ever-bigger government, higher taxes, and more efforts by Washington to redistribute wealth.

That battle won't come too soon for the hosts of conservative talk radio shows, still one of the most powerful shapers of opinion on the right. Rush Limbaugh, the king of conservative radio, announced recently that he hoped Obama would fail as president because it would torpedo the resurgence of liberalism. He also told his millions of listeners that Obama is "obviously more frightened of me than he is of Mitch McConnell [the GOP leader in the Senate]. He's more frightened of me than he is of, say, John Boehner [the House GOP leader], which doesn't say much about our party."

Few Republicans in Washington disagreed with him, at least not publicly. And one who did, Rep. Phil Gingrey of Georgia, backed off quickly when his office was inundated with phone calls and E-mails from Limbaugh fans. At first, Gingrey defended McConnell and Boehner and said Limbaugh was off base, but he ended up calling Limbaugh's show to apologize for what he said were "stupid comments."

But even if they shy away from Limbaugh's bluntness, his goal of making sharp distinctions appears to be increasingly shared by GOP leaders in Washington. To that end, House GOP leaders this week asked Democrats in the House to consider imposing a freeze on current federal spending. And they served notice that they will oppose key provisions of Obama's proposed budget for 2010, which he just released Thursday. This kind of naysaying, while popular in many conservative districts, is causing the GOP problems in other quarters. It even resulted in a lampooning on NBC's Satur day Night Live in early February when a skit made fun of GOP intransigence.

Meanwhile, Obama promotes the Democrats as the party of action. He added to that can-do image this week when he said the recession demands immediate and dramatic action from the federal government. And, attempting to blunt the GOP's charges, he added: "I have no interest in making government bigger for the sake of it. I've got more than enough on my plate." In his address to Congress, he moved further into conservative territory, at least rhetorically, when he repeated his pledge to halve the government's $1.3 trillion deficit, which he inherited from President Bush's administration, by 2013, the end of his first term. His budget outline projects the deficit at $533 billion by 2013.

Democratic strategist Mark Mellman says recent polls have shown that voters prefer Democrats over Republicans to deal with the nation's key problems by 26 percentage points, up from 21 just before the November election. An Associated Press poll shows congressional Democrats with a 16-point lead over Republicans on dealing with the economy, the No. 1 issue. And Obama's approval advantage over the GOP ranges from 26 to 35 points in recent surveys, Mellman says.

Adding to the GOP's message problem is that the party's mostly unifed front in Congress doesn't hold up at the state level. No Republicans in the House and only three in the Senate voted for Obama's stimulus legislation, but governors are less in sync. While some GOP governors, such as Jindal and Haley Barbour of Mississippi, say they will refuse to accept a small portion of the federal assistance under the stimulus because they might become overly reliant on the federal government, the governors of two megastates had different ideas. Both Arnold Schwarzenegger of California and Charlie Crist of Florida said that they would gladly take the federal money because their states need the help.

One other challenge for the GOP is to escape from former President George W. Bush's shadow. He remains very unpopular with Americans, is widely blamed for the current recession, and defines, for many voters, the GOP brand. It's very possible, GOP strategists say, that the Democrats will be able to link Bush to GOP candidates in gubernatorial elections in New Jersey and Virginia this year, in the midterm elections of 2010, and in the general election of 2012. Guilt by association has worked before. Herbert Hoover hurt Republicans for many years. And Jimmy Carter tarnished the Democrats more recently.

For now, the GOP's challenge is to find a way to clearly define itself as a party and block what the Republicans consider to be Democratic excesses without seeming obstructionist and, at the same time, show a pragmatic desire to get results for the American people. It's a tall order, but the Republicans are making a start.

Tags:
Michael Steele,
Barack Obama,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (23)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

ykMHNm

Pgnrwwto of CT 10:13AM July 14, 2009

For too long now the republican platform has been too weak on substance in not stressing to the American voters that we - the republicans - stand for small government, lower taxes, term limits, and end to Congressional Relief Action Programs...CRAP!

Frankly, it's high time the parties went away in favor of patriots who are duty bound to preserve the tenets of the Constitution, Bill of Rights, the constituents (for whom they work) and the president.

The President proposes and the congress disposes, therefore since we have bloated government, high taxes, loss of founding principles to greed, graft in the form of "political contributions", lobbying, etc., it's because they want it that way, therefore NEVER vote for either an incumbant or a democrat...and the liberal republicans do not exist since if they claim to be such they're lying through their yellow, cigar stained, teeth because he who claims to be a liberal republican is sucking up to the conservative voters while voting and supporting the radicals, otherwise known as democrats.

My dad always said: "The politician will give you something with one hand while taking it back with the other." I see evidence of that right now and if the congress would give us (U.S.) the Fair Tax the offshore money would pour into the country since the IRS would be history under the Fair Tax with the repeal of the 16th amendment. That would repair the decades of our mismanaged money and many other countries have already adopted it and are doing quite well.

When republicans fail to vote or write-in some name on the ballot they are foolish. When they vote for a third party candidate, they waste the vote - and that doesn't send any message to anyone. In Oklahoma the ballot has a black line connecting the choice - it goes into the counting machine and no hanky-panky is able to be done - absentee voting is risky, early voting is a risky and none of that should be allowed - Question: How many who voted early for Omama found out more facts close to election day and realized they made a mistake?

On way we can all help is to tell all those with whom we see that we must get the democrats our of our government. W.Wilson gave us the FED in 1913 with NO ratification...J.P.Morgan financed his election campaign. FDR prolonged the depression with schemes of hiring to get votes, only to lay off those after the election was over. LBJ gave us the Great Society, a 5-trillion dollar mistake and escalated the Vietnmam War. Carter gave away the Panama Canal and got us 13% inflation and lowsy government. JFK was not the worst of the lot. Clinton was, as my dad also said: "The World's best politican but the World's worst president. His demeaning of the office of the presidency and the Lewinsky episodes should have got him removed from office - but then, the democrats protect their own quite well!

Ronald Reagan brought us out of the Carter years quite well, but the democrats hate his memory - he made fools of them!

Don P. Simons of OK 9:25AM May 10, 2009

For too long now the republican platform has been too weak on substance in not stressing to the American voters that we - the republicans - stand for small government, lower taxes, term limits, and end to Congressional Relief Action Programs...CRAP!

Frankly, it's high time the parties went away in favor of patriots who are duty bound to preserve the tenets of the Constitution, Bill of Rights, the constituents (for whom they work) and the president.

The President proposes and the congress disposes, therefore since we have bloated government, high taxes, loss of founding principles to greed, graft in the form of "political contributions", lobbying, etc., it's because they want it that way, therefore NEVER vote for either an incumbant or a democrat...and the liberal republicans do not exist since if they claim to be such they're lying through their yellow, cigar stained, teeth because he who claims to be a liberal republican is sucking up to the conservative voters while voting and supporting the radicals, otherwise known as democrats.

My dad always said: "The politician will give you something with one hand while taking it back with the other." I see evidence of that right now and if the congress would give us (U.S.) the Fair Tax the offshore money would pour into the country since the IRS would be history under the Fair Tax with the repeal of the 16th amendment. That would repair the decades of our mismanaged money and many other countries have already adopted it and are doing quite well.

When republicans fail to vote or write-in some name on the ballot they are foolish. When they vote for a third party candidate, they waste the vote - and that doesn't send any message to anyone. In Oklahoma the ballot has a black line connecting the choice - it goes into the counting machine and no hanky-panky is able to be done - absentee voting is risky, early voting is a risky and none of that should be allowed - Question: How many who voted early for Omama found out more facts close to election day and realized they made a mistake?

On way we can all help is to tell all those with whom we see that we must get the democrats our of our government. W.Wilson gave us the FED in 1913 with NO ratification...J.P.Morgan financed his election campaign. FDR prolonged the depression with schemes of hiring to get votes, only to lay off those after the election was over. LBJ gave us the Great Society, a 5-trillion dollar mistake and escalated the Vietnmam War. Carter gave away the Panama Canal and got us 13% inflation and lowsy government. JFK was not the worst of the lot. Clinton was, as my dad also said: "The World's best politican but the World's worst president. His demeaning of the office of the presidency and the Lewinsky episodes should have got him removed from office - but then, the democrats protect their own quite well!

Ronald Reagan brought us out of the Carter years quite well, but the democrats hate his memory - he made fools of them!

Don P. Simons of OK 9:23AM May 10, 2009

Photo Galleries

Before and After the Joplin Tornado

A look at Joplin one year after the deadly tornado.

advertisement

Latest Video