Bobby Jindal, Rising GOP Star and Potential 2012 Presidential Candidate, Panned Over Obama Rebuttal

February 26, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (17)

By Olivia Smith
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Paging Bobby Jindal, the GOP's latest greatest hope.

The Louisiana governor's rebuttal to President Barack Obama's speech on Tuesday has drawn a malestrom of attention  - none of it the kind Jindal and Republicans were hoping for.

Among the newest jibes is an Internet video comparing the 37-year-old former Rhodes scholar to Kenneth Parcell, the barely-post-adolescent page on the NBC comedy "30 Rock."

A new Facebook group titled "Bobby Jindal is Kenneth the Page" had already attracted more than 1,800 members by Wednesday afternoon.

Add this to New York Times columnist David Brooks calling Jindal's remarks "insane," and a Fox New commentator, Juan Williams, drubbing Jindal's delivery as flat and amateur.

The reaction may have Repulicans wondering what happened to the guy who wowed people on NBC's "Meet the Press" just last Sunday, and who impressed seasoned journalists after a meeting with Obama on Monday.

On those occasions, Jindal delivered an incisive critique of the President's $787 stimulus package, including a convincing defense of his decision to reject some of his state's share of the money.

So what happened?

According to Chris Mathews, the host of MSNBC's "Hardball," the cards were stacked against Jindal from the moment he stepped on screen.

Mathews created his own related mini-controversy when he was recorded saying, "Oh, God," as Jindal was about to speak.

Mathews explained Wednesday that he was reacting to what he perceived as a pompous lead-in that invited comparisons between Jindal, speaking from the Louisiana's governor's mansion, and President Obama.

"Gov. Bobby Jindal walking from somewhere in the back of this narrow hall, this winding staircase looming there, the odd antebellum look of the scene," he said. "Some people heard my reaction at the time. What was the message in all this? Was this some mimicking of a president walking along the state floor to the East Room? And at the same time that the Republicans are so far from Washington that they can't be blamed for anything?"

Matthews said he wasn't referring to Jindal himself, or anything he expected the governor to say.

Jindal's problems didn't end with his intro. His remarks were deemed insensitive on a myriad of fronts, including one in particular where he arguably should have know better.

Jindal singled out $140 million to the U.S. Geological Survery for volcano monitoring as an example of the bailout's excessiveness. Someone whose own state rightly received a massive influx of government cash after Hurricane Katrina, and is still struggling to recover from that natural disaster more than 3 years after the fact, might have pinned his critique of Obama's plan on a different issue.

His remarks provoked steam from at least one politician who lives in the vicinity of a smoldering lava-filled summitt.

"Does the governor have a volcano in his backyard?" said Royce Pollard, the mayor of Vancouver, Washington, which is dangerously close to Mount St. Helens. "We have one that's very active, and it still rumbles and spits and coughs very frequently," he said Wednesday, as reported by CNN.

Many acknowledged that the wildly popular and oratorically gifted President Obama is a tough act to follow. Conservative pundit Rush Limbaugh and a few others came to Jindal's defense. "We cannot shun politicians who speak for our beliefs just because we don't like the way he says it," Limbaugh said on his radio show Wednesday.

But the speech has others wondering if this is one GOP phenom whose moment ended almost before it began.

This is one page Jindal, and the Republican party, will want to turn over quickly.

Tags:
New York Daily News,
Bobby Jindal,
Republican Party,
Barack Obama,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (17)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Thanks for the heads up about what's in store for us. And for those who think our government is somehow different, think about this:

1. the switch-over to digital TV was supposed to occur on Feb 17. It didn't because the government couldn't figure out a way to give away - yes, that's right, give away, 5 million coupons for converter boxes. But they'll somehow figure out how to give away $817 billion, right?

2. the government, 8 years ago, started a project to computerize the collection and tabulation of census data in preparation for the 2010 census. They spent $1.2 billion on the new system. Last spring, they determined the system was hopelessly behind schedule and trashed it. They're reverting back to paper and pencil at an additional cost of $400 million.

3. FAA "penetration teams", known as Red Teams, infiltrated security at every major airport in the US in 1999 and 2000. These teams prepared reports detailing major flaws in airport security. How did the FAA deal with the problem? They disbanded the penetration teams, thereby eliminating the embarrassing reports. The 9/11 hijackers exploited the very same security flaws detailed in the Red Team reports.

I can go on and on. How the Department of Agriculture has more employees than there are farmers in the US, how $78 billion is unaccounted for in the first round of TARP, how it costs the government 1.4 cents to make a penny, over the last 10 years, the government has averaged $16 billion annually in "lost" money.

Think about it. This is the bureaucracy that is going to be making more and more decisions about how you run your life - from medical decisions for you and your children, to how much you can make, the car you drive, where you attend school. The next time you have to go to the Department of Motor Vehicles, think that those people are going to be running every aspect of your life. That's what you voted for.

Rod Jr. of IL 12:05PM February 27, 2009

I lived in France for 2.5 years. My observations are that the french citizens lack control of their lives because the government is in control - health, career, and retirement. If you are not smart enough you can't go to college - because the government pays. If you are sick (I took my daughter to the doctor a number of times) the office was retro - like 20 years behind the times. Remember 5 years ago when patients died during one summer when they experienced a heat wave. If they don't have air conditioning, it makes you wonder what kind of equipment is in the emergency room. Medicine is free in france. Unemployment is in the high teens. The city where I worked, unemployment was about 20%. There was also a great degree of under-employment. The building manager had an accounting degree but couldn't find work in his profession so he was the apartment manager - he kept the floors clean and children off the grass. Labor unions choked the economy. The chemical plant where I worked there were 5 major unions and another 15 lesser unions all working in a plant with abou 1,800 people. There were strikes every few months, normally announced, and often lasting one day. What a mess for management and bad for the environment - starting and stopping a chemical plant is wasteful. A good friend lost his job and the union shipyard shutdown because it wasn't cost competitive - so being 55 years old, he retired before he wanted and hasn't worked since because no one would hire him. Companies use lots of contractors because they don't want direct employees. If a company has a cut back in work force, they need to pay the government for 10 years of salary for each person - so it is prohibitive to have internal employees - easier to run off a contractor. Pension/retirement - french citizens retire at 70% of their salary. But guess what, the french take 70% of their salary while they work. I saw a frenchman's pay stub - it was a full page of deductions for every type of tax under the sun. SO WHERE IS THE USA GOING ? - STRAIGHT TO SOCIALISM. O'bama's policies (yes, I think he is Irish) are moving the country into a position where the government is increasingly in control of our personal lives. Progressives call it social democracy, but it is really socialism. So how does this matter? Do you really think that the government is efficient? Do you think that the government is fair? Giving money to the various states for helping with their unique problems - who is concerned about Hawaii, or how about Iowa. When do they get in the news? When did the government single them out for some pork? Every job created by the government is 1.5 jobs (my opinion) that are lost in the private sector. Sure, let's take the path of big government - struggle along for the next 60 years and see how effective we have NOT become.

Notafrenchfry of TX 11:00AM February 27, 2009

Airhead Jindal does not need to be in any position of power. Not only does he look stupid, he says stupid things. Good-bye Jindal!

EsperanzA of TX 9:34AM February 27, 2009

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos