Where $300 Billion in Bailout Cash Went

From the Troubled Asset Relief Program's inspector general, details on how the money was spent

February 5, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Noting that Congress's massive bailout program has turned the U.S. government into one of the biggest investors in the failing U.S. bank and auto industries, a report by the new special inspector general on the Troubled Asset Relief Program says that taxpayers—TARP's funders—must be kept abreast of decisions regarding where the money goes.

Little in the report (part 1, part 2) is new information, but it's the most comprehensive overview yet of where the first installment of a total $700 billion in TARP funds has gone. That's because the 185-page document is meant to be "a ready reference on what TARP is and how it has been used" in order to increase the program's overall transparency, the report says.

To try to achieve accessibility, the report uses charts and relatively straightforward language. And definitions of key words—like "insolvency" and "mortgage-backed securities"—appear along the margins.

"The American taxpayer has been asked to fund—to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars—an unprecedented effort to stabilize the financial system and promote economic recovery," the report reads. "The public has a right to know both how the U.S. Department of the Treasury decided to invest that money and what was done with it by the recipients."

Laying out where funds have gone, the report shows that, through January 23, TARP committed just under $300 billion of its approved funds. Nearly two thirds of that, or $194.2 billion, went to 317 banks as part of TARP's "Capital Purchase Program," which invests in "healthy" banks.

The report notes, however, that two recipients of that funding, Bank of America and Citigroup, might not seem like obvious contenders. They're also participating in two other programs that "focus on financial institutions at risk of losing market confidence."

In return for its investment, the government has received preferred stock shares and warrants of common stock. So far, the Treasury has received more than $271 million in dividend payments.

Meanwhile, another $40 billion of TARP funding, or 13 percent, has gone to direct investment in AIG. And $40 billion more was invested in Citigroup and Bank of America, along with another $5 billion for an insurancelike program that would protect the two institutions from the toxic assets that they had on the books.

But the lending has come with caveats, including on executives' privilege. AIG, for example, was required to freeze its annual bonus pool for its top category of executives, or about 60 people. Senior partners at AIG were also prohibited from receiving golden parachute payments that are larger than three times their base salary amount.

In a continued effort at transparency, the report says that the special investigator general's office will post all "reports, testimony, audits, and investigations" on its website "as soon as possible." It also is launching a hotline that anyone can call with allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse of TARP funding.

Tags:
government intervention,
Treasury Department,
economic stimulus

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Did anyone ask the taxpayer's permission to use our money to bail out toxic assets. Nope.

Did anyone ask the taxpayers permission to use our money to fund other government needs. Nope.

Did the taxpayer get a personal invitation to review the circumstances and comment on the Bank's stupidity? Nope.

Were we warned of this impending doom. Yep.

Did the government officials listen? Nope.

Did they get a paycheck every two weeks from the taxpayer? Yep.

Did they protect us? Nope.

Do you think I have pity for a ceo and his bank balance? Nope.

Do the ceo families live with no health insurance? Nope.

Do elected officials drive government cars? Yep.

Do elected officials pay for gas for those cars? Nope.

Do elected officials work 40 hours a week 52 weeks a year? Nope.

Do elected officials live in mobile homes and trailers? Nope.

Do elected officials go without dental care? Nope.

Then why are they there?

Taxpayer of FL 1:15PM February 06, 2009

Why were the monies not overseen better under Bush. CE-Os' and other band officers got millions if not billions of our money in bonuses' during this time and no one is screaming about this!

Why is the news media not bringing this to the forefront of the news and explaining to us (USA citizens) how our bailout money could go to this. No one deserves this much money when they ran a business into the ground.

If I do that my business will be lost, the end. No bail outs for my and certainly no bonuses' for the CEO.

We live on what we have and this is what they need to do.

Its' like they received a bonus for doing a bad job. What kind of president does this make for future bailouts. Then the first thing Congress, ect does is

condemm Obama for trying to get us out of it and watch over the money closer. Bush got us into this problem but is not around to help get us out.

We need more questions answered from his staff that decided who and how much money was given to the banks under the Bush Administration. Millions of citizens feel this way and are very frustrated and want answers.

Elsie Eten of FL 8:16AM February 06, 2009

Photo Galleries

Before and After the Joplin Tornado

A look at Joplin one year after the deadly tornado.

advertisement

Latest Video