With Bush's Departure, Mulling the Future Lives of Former Presidents

January 22, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (18)

Why don't presidents have a more defined role in public life—as members of the National Security Council, say—where their experience could be put to use?
The question of what to do with these people has confounded Americans for years. People just didn't know how to effectively draw upon their reservoirs of wisdom. I guess part of the issue is that there's never been a former president that's clamored for it. There's been a more or less unstated rule that a former president should not play a formal role in politics.

What did you make of the White House meeting a few weeks ago between Obama and all of the living presidents? Why doesn't that happen more often?
It was unprecedented for a president-elect to bring together all the surviving ex-presidents, to help provide him some degree of insight and counsel. One could be uncharitable and just look at it as an early Obama photo op that had no greater meaning to it, but I actually think it was significant, in terms of symbolism.

Who do you think had the most successful post-presidency?
I would say it would be head to head with John Quincy Adams and Jimmy Carter. Adams had an astonishing 17-year sequel as a member of the House of Representatives. He had a very middling—one could argue, below-average—presidency, but [within a year of leaving office in 1829] he was on his way back to Washington, where he [led the effort] to deal with the question of slavery.

Why Carter?
There's no question Carter has changed the thinking about what a former president should or could do. People disagree; they have some problems with some of his involvement in foreign affairs. But he has made human rights part of the foreign policy lexicon, and he has maintained this notion that every side needs to be heard and respected and sit around the table.

Some historians predict Bush's post-presidential years will be like those of James Buchanan, who failed to prevent the Civil War. Bush has said he hopes to be resurrected by history, as Truman was. Which do you think is more likely?
After the last eight years, I believe Bush will be more like Buchanan, who was never rehabilitated, spent the remainder of his days writing this exculpatory memoir, and has been seen ever since as a colossal failure as president. It's very difficult to predict things, but I'm hard-pressed to imagine that the Bush administration is going to be seen in a different light.

Tags:
John Quincy Adams,
George W. Bush,
Bill Clinton,
baseball,
MLB,
Richard M. Nixon,
Jimmy Carter,
President,
Harry S Truman

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Appoint Admit,figure knee recommend upper original criterion compare substantial requirement approach late trip reality external share nod trust quite pocket experience work working commission opportunity enemy today rest module earn comment access thought sexual myself deal quick happen fund material its past newspaper condition smile winner little reflect train withdraw use find hope experiment environmental role pleasure both rich female rest meal examination pension right pub sorry expectation scientist active just slightly chairman fast cry indicate woman considerable cry look indeed perfect decide let newspaper animal

hotel suchen frankreich of 9:41AM May 01, 2010

sheila you have no idea of what weve gotten ourselves into electing obama. "a real president" no way!

David the republican of TX 4:19PM February 03, 2009

A lot of people seem to be praising Bush for keeping us safe for the last 7 years. I do not really have a stat to back this up other than my personal experience of traveling, but it seems to me that there is more hatred toward America today than there has been at any other point in my lifetime. Have we had a terrorist attack on America in the last 7 years? No. But are we safer than we were 8 years ago? That's a more difficult question to answer, but I think there are probably more people today that would like to inflict harm on this country than there were 7 years ago.

of CA 8:26PM January 28, 2009

Photo Galleries

Women on Death Row

Only 12 women have been executed on death row in the U.S. since 1976.

advertisement

Latest Videos