Bush Offers Chrysler, GM $17.4 Billion Bailout—With Strings

The struggling automakers have three months to prove that they can return to viability

December 19, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (10)

Blunders and corporate jet rides aside, two of the Big Three of the auto industry finally got their bailout: President Bush announced this morning that the government would lend the carmakers $17.4 billion in return for certain concessions.

The money is meant only to give the companies some breathing room, during which they can extensively restructure and prove their viability, Bush said. They have three months to do so. If they can’t, he said, the government will call its loans regardless, leaving the companies to their fates.

The money, which will come from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, at first will include $9.4 billion to General Motors and $4 billion to Chrysler. Both have said that they will fail without immediate help. Chrysler’s struggles were underlined this week when it announced it would shut its 30 factories for a full month, rather than the two weeks that is traditional at this time of year. Ford has said it doesn’t need immediate assistance.

Allowing the Big Three to fail, Bush said, “is not a responsible course” in the midst of a recession.

The bailout calls for concessions from the companies similar to those in the auto bailout that failed in Congress a week ago, including reduced executive pay and the elimination of private corporate jets. That bill passed the House but was rejected by the Senate, leaving any possibility of a bailout to the White House.

Despite the agreement’s similarities to the congressional bill, there’s one big difference: The White House won’t appoint a “car czar” to oversee the industry, an idea that had caused controversy. Instead, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson will oversee the program until President-elect Barack Obama takes over, at which point the new administration will decide whether to change the terms of the agreement.

The immediate effect of the announcement was a boost to the stock market. In the first half-hour of trading, the Dow rose 0.62 percent and the Nasdaq 1.18 percent.

But with other economic indicators pointing to a deepening recession, investors remain, unsurprisingly, wary. 

Tags:
car manufacturers,
George W. Bush,
bailout

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

i I WAS NEVER IN THE JOBS BANK EITHER WORKED 6 AND 7 DAYS A WEEK 10 HOURS A DAY WITH NO TIME FOR FAMILY FOR 38 YEARS I WORKED HARD AND YOU WANT ME TO HAVE NOTHING. I GET $1100 A MONTH FROM GM PENSION THE REST FROM SOCIAL SECURITY I PAY 100% OF MY DOCTORS BILLS BECAUSE THEY DO NOT COVER IT AND YOU SAY I GET TO MUCH .IT WAS HARD GRUELING WORK TOO. IT IS A SHAME HOW UNINFORMED PEOPLE ARE. MY PENSION WAS 2200 WHEN I FIRST RETIRED BUT SOON AS I TURNED 63 THEY CUT IT IN HALF AND FORCE YOU ON SS FOR THE REST, I AM 64 NOW AND YES I HAVE EARNED IT

BRENT GARDNER of FL 9:36AM December 26, 2008

The main problem with your post is the statement "Retirees worked for those benefits". The UAW never worked! This is one of the main reasons the Big 3 is in this position. When a person can be in the Job Bank for 14 years (California plant) and never work during that time and get 95% of their pay, something is very wrong!

Your just lucky that that Bush is not the smartest guy in the world. A more intelligent President would have followed the advice of the Senate and let the Big 3 declare bankruptcy and re-organize.

of MI 7:29PM December 19, 2008

I realize that the big 3 failing is bad for the US and the world's economy, but in my opinion he didn't hammer the UAW enough in this deal.

The UAW had negotiated the workers' benefits to the point that the big 3 can no longer effectively compete with the transplants who operate in the non-union states. Certainly the UAW was looking out for the employees' and their own interests, but this has a limit...and they have exceeded by such a margin that radical reconstruction will be the only method to save the big 3 and the workers' jobs.

Understand the retirees have earned their pensions, but the current workers must learn to live without such a safety net, but alas its better to have a paying job now with reduced retirement benefits than no job...

My biggest issue with the UAW is the infrastructure that it must have to sustain itself. In my humble opinion maintianing the UAW's internal operation is a significant portion of the $29 per hour difference between the UAW and the transplant workers wages. I say eliminating the UAW will get the big 3 closer to the wages paid by the transplants, and allow the big 3 to compete once again.

Two more issues trouble me WRT the auto industry and its UAW. I'm wondering why:

- 53% of the autos sold in the US are from other than the big 3?

- the big 3 execs drove environmentally friendly cars to the congressional hearings (the second hearings), but how did the UAW president travel to DC...in a plane?

The days of big labor must end. The UAW has fulfilled its original purpose of creating a safe and decent paying work environment, but in the last few decades the UAW's greed and lack of foresight has caused the big 3 to become uncompetetive, unprofitable, and soon-to-be bankrupt. As President-elect Obama would say, "its time for a change from the ways of old."

Iggy1962 of AL 4:56PM December 19, 2008

Photo Galleries

Women on Death Row

Only 12 women have been executed on death row in the U.S. since 1976.

advertisement

Latest Videos