Hurricane Katrina Left a Mark on George W. Bush’s Presidency

December 11, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (16)

He is one of the most controversial figures in American life. And, as he approaches the end of his presidency, George W. Bush has finally joined the raging national debate about his legacy. In recent interviews and public statements, Bush has been more contemplative and revealing than ever as he assesses his eight years in office, attempts to lift his public image out of the trough, and shapes perceptions of his era. In this series, U.S. News reviews the Bush presidency from the beginning in 2001with a special focus on five of his most fateful decisions, including going to war in Iraq and, more recently, approving a huge bailout of the financial industry.

Botching Katrina. It was a disaster at every level. But in political terms, the government's failure to respond effectively to Hurricane Katrina in the late summer of 2005 was Bush's biggest setback at home. "Katrina showed he is incompetent," says Howard Dean, outgoing chairman of the Democratic National Committee. "Before Katrina, everyone, including America's friends and enemies, believed if something awful happened in the world, you could call in the Americans and they'd fix it." The government response to the hurricane, which devastated New Orleans and much of the Gulf Coast, ruined that reputation, Dean argues.

Bush seemed slow off the mark as millions of people suffered, and he created a lasting image of isolation when the White House released photos of him, a solitary figure in his cushy seat, looking out a window on Marine One at the hurricane devastation far below. He also made a huge mistake when he praised Michael Brown, the director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, with a now infamous attaboy—"Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job"—even though the agency was botching the disaster response, adding to the impression that Bush was out of touch.

White House advisers say the blame for the poor Katrina response must be shared by the federal, state, and local governments, especially in dealing with the hurricane-related problems in New Orleans. Bush defenders add that he was correct not to visit the disaster sites immediately because to do so would have greatly complicated the relief efforts on the ground.

More substantively, Bush refrained from having the federal government immediately take over the relief effort even when it became clear that the state and local governments in Louisiana were not up to the job. His aides say Bush was guided here by his experience as governor of Texas and his belief that such matters are best left to lower-level officials. "For him, it was a question of usurpation of power," says a former senior adviser. But his failure to act while thousands of desperate people, unable to find food or water, were appealing for help on national television erased his image as an effective decision maker.

Tags:
Michael Brown,
New Orleans,
emergency planning,
FEMA,
George W. Bush,
Bush administration,
natural disasters,
hurricanes,
Hurricane Katrina

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

okay, now many years later we have hurricane Sandy in New York and we are now 12 days later with many hurting people on Long Island with NO POWER and long, long lines at the gas stations. But where is the main stream media in complaining that Obama is no where to be found? oh yea, he flew in to New Jersey and had some great photo's with Chris Christie and became such a 'hero' for looking good a few days before his reelection, but meanwhile, FEMA has failed NY and Obama has failed NY and I'm really sick of the bias that everything is Bush's fault, but where are these same people now crying foul at Obama for neglecting his responsibility to do whatever needed to be done to help these people on Long Island. As right now, we have hundreds of thousands of people who are homeless, without power and it is cold! I am from Long Island, I have family there still and it is appalling.

Debbie Rose of CO 7:45PM November 09, 2012

This is quite an old thread so I'll keep it short:

Regardless of the local and state government response, the fact of the matter is this; they were dealing with a situation that they couldn't cope with. If America is willing to step in on another country unwanted to provide "aid", how is it not reasonable, nay, expected for them to step into one of their own states and assist suffering people.

Using bureaucracy as an excuse to prolong the suffering of so many people is ridiculous. Residents of New Orleans should be forced to suffer because their local and state government couldn't handle the situation as well as other cities impacted? That's very cold hearted.

Michael of CA 3:16PM May 28, 2010

What I want to know is if the same people who condemned Bush so loudly for not dropping everything and immediately flying to New Orleans are condemning President Obama for not dropping everything and flying to Fort Hood.

Does the fact that Obama didn't do that ALSO PROVE that HE didn't care about what happened in FT HOOD??!! HMMMMMMM? Yeah, I didn't think so.

Richard Mason of OR 12:08AM November 18, 2009

Photo Galleries

Women on Death Row

Only 12 women have been executed on death row in the U.S. since 1976.

advertisement

Latest Videos