To Jolt Economy, Obama and Congress Eye Billions in Infrastructure Spending

December 9, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Chicago is the nation's rail hub, boasting 1,200 trains a day, 2,800 miles of track, 78 rail yards, and, often, frustrating and costly congestion. Bottlenecks can be so bad that freight trains, which take two days to make the 2,200-mile trip from the Port of Los Angeles, can spend almost as long inching across the Windy City.

Now, a cash-strapped Chicago program to fix that problem may be an unlikely beneficiary of the nation's troubled economy. It is one of many large infrastructure projects being discussed as a key part of a multibillion-dollar economic stimulus package being assembled in Congress and expected to be approved early in Barack Obama's presidency. The president-elect has vowed to create 2.5 million jobs in two years. His pledge has advisers, congressional leaders, and economists armed with sophisticated computer models wrestling with how to make investments with an immediate payoff in terms of new "made in America" jobs.

The result is shaping up to be a massive infusion for public works projects, reminiscent of efforts following the Great Depression. And it has triggered a lobbying spree as potential recipients extol the advantages of specific projects, whether it be a new Tappan Zee Bridge in New York, a refurbished Interstate 70 to zip motorists across Missouri, or improved port and rail facilities in the San Francisco Bay area.

In Chicago, it's a little-known initiative with a catchy slogan, "Keeping the 'Go' in Chicago," that could gain. Formally the Chicago Region Environmental and Transportation Efficiency Program, or CREATE, it's a public-private partnership that has drawn up $1.5 billion of projects—only a few of which have been completed—to speed up rail traffic and relieve street congestion.

The full recovery package Obama wants will include not only money for infrastructure, his aides say, but also middle-class tax relief and help for struggling states. Its price tag and composition, however, remain under debate. The goal is to spend money quickly to spur aggregate demand—what's spent on goods and services—over the next two years, amid fears of a prolonged recession.

One key voice in what may wind up being a coast-to-coast rebuilding binge is Democratic Rep. James Oberstar of Minnesota, the chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. He is high on CREATE, saying it would unclog a national chokepoint and cut transport costs, traffic delays, and pollution. "Infrastructure," he promises, "is going to be the cornerstone of this stimulus initiative."

Rebuild America. Top Democrats have thrown out numbers as high as $700 billion for the overall package. Oberstar, for his part, just devised a $45 billion proposal called "Rebuild America" to fix roads, bridges, airports, railways, transit systems, wastewater treatment facilities, and the like. It would cover 100 percent of the cost of projects including resurfacing highways, repairing runways, cleaning up brownfields, and sprucing up the National Zoo in Washington. Major beneficiaries would be highways and bridges ($18.25 billion), environmental infrastructure ($9 billion), transit ($6.5 billion), the Army Corps of Engineers ($5 billion), federal buildings ($2.5 billion), rail ($2 billion), and aviation ($1 billion). Priority would be given to "ready-to-go" projects that could award contracts in 90 to 120 days.

Oberstar says his plan would generate $223 billion in economic activity and create or sustain 1.25 million jobs—jobs he says can't be outsourced to call centers in Bangalore, India, and are desperately needed because unemployment among construction workers has soared to more than 1 million.

Obama also met with the nation's governors, who are touting $136 billion in potential projects, though only $57 billion of those projects could break ground within 120 days. At the same time, the U.S. Conference of Mayors is pushing a slate of 4,591 infrastructure projects costing $24.4 billion. And at the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, John Horsley says there are even more that are ready to go. "These aren't a gleam in someone's eyes," he says. "These are projects that are engineered, planned, and have gone through a systematic selection process."

Tags:
Congress,
economy,
economic stimulus,
Barack Obama,
Chicago

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Cutler's custom modular housing sounds good. A tax incentive would help. My lifetime project about employment is to reduce population. That way, we break the historic pattern of "too many people for too few jobs." I want Congress to invest taxes in free sex-education, free contraception, free voluntary sterilization and free abortion. There are too many consumers in every nation, and too many paupers who collect foreign aid from us at tax expense. But Ban-Abortion churches want to force women to continue producing generations of people who take the place of tithers who die or lose faith. Every nation can benefit from having nicely-designed modular houses, made in a thrifty way, easily transported and put in place. Best wishes to Mr. Cutler, back East.

aura dawn veirs of CA 2:55AM October 19, 2009

We are a small architectural firm in Wilton CT seeking government work. We have a unigue specialty in designing custom modular built housing. This would be a perfect fit for military or embesy housing. For over 6 months we have marketed to government agentcies and submitted RFPs. With little or no feedback. The few answers we have gotten back from government contract officers are the stimulus money has been not released yet. We have invested 100's of hours and over 100,000 dollars to get government work in addition to employing service providers to help. As of yet NOTHING!

Is there simply too many applicants? or do you need special connections? The government has so called systems in place such as FAR to keep oppourtunities fair for all small business. Does this really work in practice? We knew this was not going to be easy but. We now question this approach to getting business, perhaps targeted tax incentives would do much better to help the economy than slogging through this bidding process. We are running out of time and money with seeking goverment oppourtunities, I will soon have to lay off the balance of my staff and shut down.

It is a shame that the skill sets developed will go to waste.

Douglas Cutler of CT 12:44AM October 17, 2009

After the environmental impact studies that the far left environmentalist demand, the funds "might" jolt the economy in 3 - 5 years. Then add to the fact that the quoted projects will end up being 3-4 times the original quoted cost, just look at the visitor center in DC.

That's going to do a lot of good for the economy.

"Change We Can Believe In"

BTW, the Stock Market is not the Economy, it seems that most American’s think they are one in the same.

Larry of CA 12:41PM December 09, 2008

Photo Galleries

Before and After the Joplin Tornado

A look at Joplin one year after the deadly tornado.

advertisement

Latest Video