Bush Cabinet Officials May Be Left Out in the Cold When They Enter the Private Sector

November 28, 2008 RSS Feed Print

With the last days of the Bush administration fast approaching, many of its highest-profile officials may need to gird themselves for the possibility that they won't be showered with the same chummy lobbying gigs and lucrative offers to join corporate boards as their predecessors, according to a study appearing in the current issue of the Academy of Management Journal.

After studying the fates of the 66 cabinet officials who served in government between 1988 and 2003, a group of management scholars find that the administrators' job prospects—particularly when it comes to high-status gigs like Al Gore's board spots at Apple and Google or Colin Powell's advisory role at Kleiner Perkins—tend to suffer when the opposite party assumes control in Washington.

"Former government officials are much less in demand for company boards when their party is out of power," says Richard Lester, a clinical associate professor of management at Texas A&M University, who coauthored the paper with three other academics. "Our research reveals that, if a party is shut out of both congressional houses plus the executive branch, as Republicans will be, its members' chance of joining the board of a large corporation is about 30 percent less than it would otherwise be."

In addition to being a handy primer for the soon-to-be-unemployed, Lester's study, "Former Government Officials as Outside Directors: The Role of Human and Social Capital," is among the first to quantify just how fast the revolving door between business and government spins—and, for political losers, how suddenly it can slam shut. Cabinet secretaries, with their political connections and legislative savvy, have long been welcomed with open arms by the private sector, and the study finds that 64 percent of those who served in government between 1988 and 2003 found jobs afterward sitting on the boards of public corporations. Ann McLaughlin, secretary of labor under the first President Bush, went on to serve as a director on 13 companies' boards. Four other Bush appointees, including Jack Kemp and Louis Sullivan, were appointed to 10 boards each.

When today's cabinet officers hit the job market, however, cushy corporate opportunities may be increasingly hard to find. According to the study, when the party of a former cabinet official holds no power in Washington—and their beltway connections and political expertise are no longer valued so highly—these same political movers and shakers find spots on corporate boards only about 35 percent of the time. The rate at which former senators and representatives land corporate gigs—something the paper also studies—is even lower. "If your company needs to navigate a new SEC rule or get to someone in Congress, these people can help you navigate this process," says Lester. "But if your party is completely out of power, your Rolodex is not as lucrative as it used to be. The people you know are probably gone."

It wasn't always this way, of course. In 1973, the study finds, only 14 percent of large corporations had any government officials at all on their boards. But in the past few decades, to the chagrin of many political purists, the foxes have been welcomed into the hen house—and vice versa. By the late 1990s, more than half of large public companies had old Washington hands serving as company directors. "Business and government are supposed to operate separately," writes Lester, who coauthored the paper with Amy Hillman of Arizona State University, Asghar Zardkoohi of Texas A&M, and Albert Cannella Jr. of Tulane University. "But in reality, they are highly intertwined."

It is not clear how this year's political changing of the guard will affect Bush's appointees, because so many of them sat on corporate boards before they took positions in government. Michael Brown, most infamously, the FEMA director who oversaw the government's response to Hurricane Katrina, served as the chairman of the board of the Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority before coming to Washington. Mitch Daniels, now the governor of Indiana, gave up his position on the board of the Indianapolis Power & Light Co. to serve as Bush's director of the Office of Management and Budget. Dick Cheney served as the chairman and CEO of Halliburton before becoming vice president. And Bush himself sat on the board of Harken Energy.

Finding a new job won't be difficult for everyone in the Bush administration, of course, even if the Democrats are in power. "For celebrities like Cheney, if they want to get on a board, they'll be able to," says Lester. But for others, the future may not be quite so lucrative. "They have to hit this pretty hard as soon as they leave office," says Lester. "If you don't get a board seat within the first few years, your chances go way down. It's significant and lasting." At least until the next election, that is.

Tags:
cabinet members,
White House,
Bush administration,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

You mention the chances of employement go down if your represent the party that has lost power in the Senate, House, and White House.

But add to that the fact that these people mislead our country into a ruinous war, more than doubled the national dept, and wrecked the economy.

What does that do for your chances, being part of the worst administration in American history?

But not to worry. On the plus side, the Bush Administration lined a lot of pockets during the last eight years with our tax dollars. Now it's time for them to collect their payoff. Loyalty among thieves.

Robert Anderson of CA 8:21PM December 01, 2008

It's only as severe as one sees it to be - and probably severe for one because of thorough indoctrination by the Left.

And severe because a deaf ear was turned to recommendations and suggestions during those eight years.

The Left is very noisy and persuasive to those who only seek a little learning.

It's every citizen's responsibility to learn the truth and not someone's idea of the truth.

Further, presidents don't have that much authority in the long run. It's Congress who resists or allows a president's recommendations. Perhaps it hoped to disparage the administration to prove its points, but it only diminished itself. Let's see what happens now.

Most of today's woes, if not all of them, are because of irresponsible behavior on the part of some Americans - and resistance by Congress.

There are some people who did not lose their retirements. There are some students who progressed to the heights of educational achievement. And because of entitlements in place, there are many elderly who are receiving beautiful and compassionate care.

The environment of the past eight years did not get disturbed to the degree the Left wants the country to believe.

The Left wants to order everyone in the country around according to its lights.

Watch out.

J. of CA 3:50PM November 30, 2008

So what do the Bush Babies expect from working in an administration which accomplished nothing, destroyed our nation, spent our children's, grandchildren's inheritance, wiped out our retirements, sacrificed our soldiers, eliminated all vestiges of our morals and sold our assets to the highest foreign bidder??? Aside from their personal wealth, they have nothing to show for 8 long dreadful years. What would any Bush Baby put on their resume??? Most bailouts in a single year, all children left behind, failure to maintain standards and accountability, most excuses in 8 years??? They must face facts, ruining a nation is not exactly resume material!!!

Ray Fisher of NM 11:02AM November 30, 2008

Photo Galleries

Before and After the Joplin Tornado

A look at Joplin one year after the deadly tornado.

advertisement

Latest Video