Congress Nears Historic Vote on $700 Billion Bailout Plan for Wall Street

The measure, which could pass this week, would redefine the government's role in the economy

September 22, 2008 RSS Feed Print
House Financial Services Committee Chairman Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) talks with reporters at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC. Frank is working with other Congressional leaders, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and others to find a legislative answer to the current financial crisis on Wall Street.

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Rep. Barney Frank talks with reporters at the U.S. Capitol.

Lawmakers closed in on a massive $700 billion rescue deal for the nation's troubled financial sector even as many lawmakers greeted the proposal with anger and skepticism, criticizing both its substance—a "cash for trash" scheme to buy troubled investments is how one put it—and the warp speed at which they're being expected to act.

In perhaps the most ambitious economic overhaul since the New Deal, the bill would fundamentally redefine the relationship between government and the country's financial sector. Still, Democratic and Republican leaders in both chambers say the huge package could win congressional approval—probably with modifications—as early as week's end.

Lawmakers were said to be nearing a tentative deal with the Bush administration after weekend negotiations that spilled into the wee hours Monday, reportedly lasting until 2:30 a.m. President Bush praised the "good headway" made in hammering out a timely bill, reminding that the "whole world is watching to see if we can act quickly to shore up our markets and prevent damage to our capital markets, businesses, our housing sector, and retirement accounts."

The Treasury Department, the architect of the plan, reportedly agreed to modifications to include mortgage aid and strong congressional oversight in the deal. "But the devil is in the details," a Democrat familiar with the talks said. "The language still has to be drafted."

One key sticking point remains sky-high Wall Street salaries and bonuses. House Democratic Speaker Nancy Pelosi has warned that Congress will not "simply hand over a $700 billion blank check to Wall Street and hope for a better outcome." A top Democratic aide added, "There's a lot of concern this is moving too fast."

On the Republican side, Mike Pence, a conservative House lawmaker from Indiana, on Monday began circulating a "Dear Colleague" letter, urging GOP members to vote "no" on the bailout. He also tried to throw up speed bumps. "Nationalizing every bad mortgage in America is not the answer," Pence wrote to colleagues.

Pence acknowledged the push for fast action but said, "I'm doubtful that the only thing standing between us and a financial panic is for Congress to sign this week, on behalf of the American taxpayer, a $700 billion check over to the Treasury."

House Democrat Peter DeFazio of Oregon had harsh words for the rescue plan from the House floor, raising the specter of the 2002 election-eve vote on use of military force, which gave congressional approval for the war in Iraq. Talking about the unprecedented bailout, he called it "sort of an immediate authorization for use of financial force."

DeFazio took a shot at Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, the former chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs. "He is of, by, for, and about Wall Street," the lawmaker said. DeFazio said in a single year, Wall Street bonuses exceeded $60 billion and added: "These people are out of control. They don't understand the real world. For them to talk about Main Street, and that they care about Main Street and student loans and homeowners' equity, is a bunch of B.S."

"We are the last bulwark here, the House of Representatives and the Senate," he concluded. "If this bill were to pass as proposed, we'll do an incredible disservice to the American people."

For Democrats, there have been three key sticking points. They want to curb the "excessive" salaries and bonuses for executives of Wall Street firms that stand to get help from Uncle Sam. They want more relief for average people with troubled mortgages. And they want more congressional oversight than outlined in Paulson's brief proposal—one DeFazio said was so short it amounted to "about $1 billion a word."

A Democratic Senate aide said Monday there's a sense that negotiations will result in a bill acceptable to lawmakers in his party. But he warned there could be defections, especially in the Republican camp.

The House will be first to debate the proposal and vote on it, and then it will be taken up in the Senate. "People are considering all kinds of different things, but in the end, we've got to get this done quickly," a top Senate GOP aide said. "We could have it on Friday."

Tags:
Barney Frank,
government intervention,
Henry Paulson,
House of Representatives,
Treasury Department,
Ben Bernanke,
Federal Reserve,
Congress,
economy,
Wall Street

Reader Comments Read all comments (41)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I have not heard one person offer up the solution of selling GOVERNMENT BONDS to raise the money. During WWII people bought WAR BONDS to fund the war, and GOVERNMENT BONDS are sold all the time to build highways, schools, etc. Government Bonds would be the guarantee taxpayerd money will be paid back-with interest. The sell of the bonds would also stimulate trading on Wall Street.

Betty Bond of KS 7:02PM October 01, 2008

I hope Barney Frank chokes on his own stupid, oversized, socialist tongue.

of GA 4:25PM October 01, 2008

Obviously regulation is needed to establish the rules of play. To use an example, in the game of football, you are free to chose any play you want...run, pass, punt, kick, etc. on any down with the intent of scoring points or preventing the other team from scoring. The game is not perfect, but if you take away the rules (that is, no offsides, no grabbing face masks, no hitting recievers before they touch the ball, etc.) the game decends into chaos. The deregulation that started with regan and continued right up thru this current President caused the problem we are expierening today. Our Government needs to establish rules and regulations to govern fair play to prevent against future decents into this financial chaos. One Candidate (Obama) suggests this, the other makes his claims on more deregulation (McCain). You can guess who I am voting for...

In regards to the bailout...it stinks. But if we do not allow this to happen, banks will no longer be willing to make loans. Banks will make loans based on the collateral offered to secure the loans. If what seems that almost every other piece of property on the street is foreclosed on because of the crisis, property looses value and banks will have a hard time calculating values to make loans. If there are no loans, the economy crumbles. Ask yourself, what if my employer can no longer access the line of credit they have to finance my payroll? Essentially, I am out of a job. I now cannot pay my mortgage. I loose my house too. The situation worses drastically. People spend less because of the crisis. If companies are not making money, they are not spending money. If companies are not spending, not only do we lose the house markets, we lose the job markets. And yes, this may very well mean you, your family, your friends, and anyone else who has made their lives what they are by working hard.

It is a 700 billion dollar bailout of Wall Street. It Stinks. But if it does not happen, the reality is that Wall Street will not be the only ones hurting. At least the people who caused this crisis already made their millions, so they should be pretty safe either way (sarcasm).

We will have this for a long time. Our children may have it. But is it worth the risk to chance not doing it? You decide. But rest assured, it is not only Wall Street that is going to be really hurting if the results go the way they seem to be going.

DecisionTime of PA 2:26PM September 30, 2008

Photo Galleries

Before and After the Joplin Tornado

A look at Joplin one year after the deadly tornado.

advertisement

Latest Video