The Most Consequential Elections in History: Abraham Lincoln's Victory in 1864 Led to the End of the Civil War

Lincoln's victory in 1860 triggered the Civil War, and his victory in 1864 allowed him to win it

July 30, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (39)

The stakes in this year's presidential campaign are high. But that's nothing new. There have been many other pivotal presidential elections in our history, some that set an entirely new course for the United States and a few that were crucial to the very survival of the republic. To put the current campaign in perspective, U.S. News White House correspondent Kenneth T. Walsh, author of four books on the presidency, examines the 10 most consequential elections in American history—the races that produced the biggest change and had the most lasting impact. An installment of this 10-part series will run on the U.S. News website each Wednesday through September. This is the second in the series.

On April 12, 1861, about five weeks after Abraham Lincoln's inauguration for his first term, Southern forces began bombarding Fort Sumter in Charleston harbor, starting the Civil War. On April 13, the Union forces surrendered, prompting jubilation in the new Confederacy and anger and disappointment in the North.

The election of Lincoln, an antislavery moderate, had been the last straw for pro-slavery leaders. His victory ended any hope they had of compromise because they were convinced that, with Lincoln in command, the North would trample the rights of the Southern states and move to end slavery. They began to secede from the Union and form a Confederacy of their own.

Many in the North thought the war would end quickly, but they didn't properly assess the military strength and the will of their adversaries, the quality of the Confederate forces' leadership, and the difficulty of invading and pacifying the Southern states. As a result, the war went very badly for the Union at first, and Lincoln's popularity in the North plummeted. He was derided as a despot, a dictator, an incompetent, and worse. At the same time, he was blamed for the many failures on the battlefield and for the horrendous casualties, posted day after day in town after town across the land. He changed generals when they lost big battles or when they didn't follow up on their limited successes, but for the early years the conflict seemed hopeless.

Meanwhile, Lincoln worked tirelessly to keep the Republican Party behind him and to minimize antiwar sentiment in the North. Many historians say he handled a very bad situation as well as anyone could have. "If there is a common denominator in presidential assessments, it is a bias toward activism, unless the activism is viewed as misplaced, as in the instances of Lyndon Johnson and Vietnam, and Nixon and Watergate," says Princeton's Fred Greenstein. Lincoln made his share of mistakes, such as choosing a succession of inept commanders, but he acted decisively and wisely when it counted most.

One of his biggest decisions—now considered a huge advance in American justice—was issuing the Emancipation Proclamation on Sept. 22, 1862, which ordered freedom for slaves in the rebellious states. This was considered a half measure by some abolitionists because it failed to free slaves in all the states. But it set the Union on the path to ending slavery eventually. It also had the effect of shoring up support for the Union in Europe, especially in the United Kingdom, which had been flirting with the Confederacy. The proclamation cost the South some important potential allies because many European leaders didn't want to back the slaveholding Confederacy and abandon the antislavery North.

Then, in 1863, the military tide turned—and the North's military success became the most important political development of the 1864 presidential campaign. Union forces won at Gettysburg and Vicksburg, and Lincoln's stock began to rise.

In 1864, there were more Union successes, including those at Atlanta and Mobile Bay, and Lincoln got much of the credit. With the war now seemingly on a positive track, he easily won a second term. He received 2.3 million votes to former Union Gen. George McClellan's 1.8 million. Even though McClellan had been Lincoln's senior commander, the former general sought an early end to the war, which was a popular position for most of the campaign. But the North's newfound military success undercut his arguments that it was time to sue for peace. Perhaps most gratifying to Lincoln, the soldiers doing the fighting gave Lincoln a huge margin, 116,887 votes to McClellan's 33,748, even though they knew that re-electing Lincoln would mean continuation of the conflict and the likelihood that many of them would be killed or wounded. But they also knew that re-electing Lincoln would virtually guarantee victory, complete with the end of slavery and the preservation of the Union, and these were their top priorities.

On March 4, 1865—in his second inaugural address—Lincoln gave one of the most eloquent and stirring speeches in history. "With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right," he said, "let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations."

The following month, five days after Gen. Robert E. Lee surrendered his Confederate forces at Appomattox, Lincoln was shot by an assassin. He died the next morning, on April 15, 1865.

In the end, Lincoln's profound legacy was created and propelled by two elections—the one in 1860, which triggered the war, and the election of 1864, which enabled Lincoln to win it. Historian Henry Adams once wrote that a president "resembles the commander of a ship at sea. He must have a helm to grasp, a course to steer, a port to seek." Lincoln understood this to his core. Added historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr.: "The Constitution offers every president a helm, but the course and the port constitute the first requirement for presidential greatness. Great presidents possess, or are possessed by, a vision of an ideal America. Their passion is to make sure the ship of state sails on the right course." Defining that vision and setting that course are what Lincoln's presidency was all about.

More from our Most Consequential Elections series:
George Washington and the Election of 1788

Thomas Jefferson and the Election of 1800

Andrew Jackson and the Election of 1828

Abraham Lincoln and the Election of 1860

Theodore Roosevelt and the Election of 1904
Woodrow Wilson and the Election of 1912

Franklin Roosevelt and the Election of 1932

Lyndon Johnson and the Election of 1964

Ronald Reagan and the Election of 1980

Tags:
Abraham Lincoln,
elections

Reader Comments Read all comments (39)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

There was only ONE cause of the War Between the American States-- THE NORTH ATTACKED.

No attack, no war.

It was NOT a "civil war," since each state is and was a sovereign nation under international law.

That's ALL that matters-- everything else just distraction from the fact that Lincoln was a mass-murdering imperialist no different from any other.

It's even a FACT, that Hitler modeled the Third Reich after Lincoln's regime, denying the sovereignty of Germanic nations, just like Lincoln denied the sovereignty of the American ones; and likewise, his exterminations of human beings, were modelled after the treatment of Native Americans under Lincoln's officials after the war-- particularly Sherman, who coined the phrase "Final Solution" in regards to all Native Americans, saying they should all be exterminated rather than put on reservations.

This really does show, that history is written by the victors.

However as Franklin said, those who fail to learn REAL history, are doomed to repeat it-- and so that's why we're living the movie "Groundhog Day."

Brian McCandliss of MI 2:38PM December 26, 2009

There were not "Two Americas, north and south." There were THIRTEEN SOVEREIGN NATIONS-- and by the time of Lincoln, there were 37. However Lincoln LIED, and claimed that they were all simply subordinate parts of ONE nation-- and anyone who disagreed publicly, was jailed and possibly TORTURED until no one else dared utter the truth. Meanwhile, Lincoln said he considered it "a simple duty on my part, and I shall perform it so far as practicable unless my rightful masters, the American people, shall withhold the requisite means or in some authoritative manner direct the contrary."

So basically he did as he pleased in the People's name, claiming that they could stop him at any time-- while in reality he was running a REIGN OF TERROR, so that none of "the American people" DARED utter a PEEP against him!

Why doesn't ANYONE bring up the fact that THE STATES ARE SOVEREIGN NATIONS- and so Lincoln was no different from Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Hussein, or even Gengis Khan?

So far, no one DARES say this: they just point out all the terrible things Lincoln did, but they STILL claim it a "civil war."

Ok, Polit Sci 101: a civil war is domestic within ONE NATION, while this was an INTERNATIONAL war.

Of course if we go by history as written by the victors, there ARE no international wars-- just "civil wars" in which the conquerors claimed national authority over other lands, which "rebelled" by refusing.

Right now, even self-proclaimed "libertarians" fail to assert that THE STATES ARE SOVEREIGN NATIONS-- which basically discredits their case against Lincoln, since they're thus ADMITTING that Lincoln was president of a single nation, against which the Southern states "rebelled."

Apparently they either don't understand the importance of national sovereignty as the highest law on Earth-- or perhaps they don't BELIEVE in it.

Brian McCandlis of MI 2:30PM December 26, 2009

Resource Experience,argue property roll mind mark as against process adopt ring damage onto award today style payment whom decade answer combination about view need connect cry vast attack physical back wonderful lip many until could look mile occur measure boat rest place return decade surface type despite kind throw limit girl issue lose hide county round spirit owner bone vote characteristic sort evening category pub enterprise pattern wind show concentration threat up fair equal hang himself business transfer male outside program early point instruction past influence most disappear type exhibition several study variety fair soft post story simply compare

Absolutelyuse of 1:31AM December 14, 2009

Photo Galleries

Storms, Wildfires Tear Across U.S.

Heavy rain, high winds and fire continue to plague regions throughout the country.

advertisement

Latest Videos