A Black Mark on FDR's Presidency

Roosevelt was pressured by advisors, and fear and prejudice ruled the day

May 8, 2008 RSS Feed Print

It's a question that still vexes historians: Why did Franklin Roosevelt, one of the country's greatest wartime presidents and a revered humanitarian, sign an order that condemned nearly 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry, most of them Americans, to years of unwarranted incarceration?

For years, the president's decision was justified with two simple words: "military necessity." Lt. Gen. John DeWitt, the Army commander overseeing the West Coast, believed neither Japanese-born immigrants nor their American children could be trusted. Fearing invasion, he thought the Japanese community was filled with spies and saboteurs. A month after Pearl Harbor, DeWitt insisted that the fact that there had not yet been any acts of sabotage "proved" that such attacks were imminent. (No American of Japanese ancestry was ever convicted of sabotage during the war.) Though Roosevelt's own intelligence network on the West Coast was assuring him that the Japanese-American community was loyal, when his local military commander pushed for removal, he relented.

The sad truth of the matter, historians say, is that DeWitt wasn't alone: The entire political establishment in the western states, from governors to congressmen to law enforcement, was pushing for "evacuation," too. War hysteria and race prejudice ruled the day. Henry McLemore, a popular newspaper columnist, captured the tenor of the times in January 1942: "I am for immediate removal of every Japanese on the West Coast to a point deep in the interior," he wrote. "I don't mean a nice part of the interior either. Herd 'em up, pack 'em off, and give 'em the inside room in the badlands."

It still isn't clear exactly what Roosevelt thought, but his cardinal sin during the months after Pearl Harbor, historians believe, was not saying anything at all. He certainly wasn't a rabid racist, and he didn't fan the flames of prejudice, but he didn't try to douse them, either. As more bad news came in from the Pacific, political momentum swelled. By February, Roosevelt faced a united front and gave in. "In times of stress," says Greg Robinson, author of By Order of the President: FDR and the Internment of Japanese Americans, "nobody can be trusted to defend constitutional rights without public support."

Once the decision was made, Roosevelt seemed to have few regrets. At a press conference in 1944, after he had won re-election and when there was no longer any threat of invasion, Roosevelt told reporters: "A good deal of progress has been made in scattering [Japanese-Americans] throughout the country," he said. "And it is felt by a great many lawyers that under the Constitution they can't be kept locked up in concentration camps." Two months later, the government announced that the internees were free to go.

Tags:
race,
World War II,
Japan,
Franklin Delano Roosevelt

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Why didn't FDR put German-Americans citizens in jail? Because military leaders' attitudes toward white-skinned immigrants was not so prejudiced. Why did he broad-brush all west-coast Japanese-Americans without due-process, violating the constitution, and stripping them of their liberty, property, and pursuit of happiness? Because he was too much of a wimp in an ocean of prejudiced democrats whose party was dominated at the time by southern democrats. Whenever a move was made to integrate the races Southern governors or congressmen would complain to Roosevelt, who would intervene to uphold segregation for the sake of keeping his party together. He partially redeemed himself when he had the backbone to sign Executive Order 8802 (also known as the Fair Employment Act). But it wasn't enough to offset the Japanese scandal nor his naming of Hugo Black, a former KKK member, to the Supreme Court.

Also, most New Deal programs discriminated against blacks. The NRAoffered whites the first crack at jobs and authorized separate and lower pay scales for blacks. The FHA refused to guarantee mortgages for blacks who tried to buy in white neighborhoods. The CCC maintained segregated camps. And the Social Security Act excluded those job categories blacks traditionally filled. The AAA acreage reduction hit blacks harder than whites, forcing more than 100,000 blacks off the land in 1933 and 1934. And the president failed to support an anti-lynching bill and a bill to abolish the poll tax.

By any measure, FDR gets at least a "D" in civil rights! His wife was much better at it.

Rich W of WA 9:11PM January 28, 2012

This is probably the dozenth time I've seen you post your stupid racist apologia site in response to a blog post critical of Japanese-American internment. Please stop posting, it is very annoying.

James of WA 1:45PM November 03, 2009

Actually, there was a case where Japanese Americans took up arms in support of Japan and it influenced the internment decision.

http://www.historynet.com/the-niihau-incident.htm/2

Bob of HI 11:34AM June 23, 2008

advertisement

Latest Video