In respeonse to the previous comments: I really don't understand why there should be a prescription for who has a valid career and has a legitimate right to hire domestic help. I've cleaned houses before and the $25 an hour I earned wasn't anything to sneeze at. It also allowed me more time with my kids. Not everyone is in a position to work full time somewhere and get benefits. Some would rather enjoy flexibility and a higher wage to compensate their household incomes, or perhaps their spouse receives benefits at work. Hiring domestic help is not cheating someone else out of a life. Seriously?
If a person can afford it, outsoursing is their choice, to spend their time as THEY choose. They do what they prefer to spend their time doing, and someone gets a job. Seems like a win-win to me.
Michelle
of ND
@
Sep 28, 2009 11:26:56 AM
$250K/YR MIDDLE CLASS?
This author reminds me of Bill Clinton, calling $250K/yr middle class. Wake up and smell the coffee, our middle household income is like $50K and I'd assume that includes enlarged family members incomes errantly added in per household recently. Families are recently shacking together during this recession/depression.
No way can the bottom 95% of the household incomes afford maids and personal assistants. Besides, why have we become so lazy? I see go to the gym and work out; but don't clean your house?
Softwarengineer
of WA
@
Jul 02, 2009 13:00:55 PM
No problem here, except one
There is something wrong with a country that presumes an endless supply of under-employed servants should be available on the cheap to do laundry at a few dollars an hour and no health insurance---for people doing things like "financial coaching, writing and managing web content." Sounds peachy for a few---and sounds like jibberish for most. You think your local second-grade teacher gets domestic help?
Michelle of ND @ Sep 28, 2009 11:26:56 AM
Softwarengineer of WA @ Jul 02, 2009 13:00:55 PM
Muser of NM @ Jul 02, 2009 13:00:02 PM
Back to article