Are Gen X-ers Falling Behind?

Author says 30-somethings feel they're losing ground—and suggests how to deal with it

By Kimberly Palmer

Posted: June 25, 2008

''There's a whole mythology built around the idea that you are what you make.''

''There's a whole mythology built around the idea that you are what you make.''

In her new book, (Not) Keeping Up With Our Parents, author Nan Mooney argues that 30- and 40-something professionals are struggling to achieve the level of financial comfort they grew up expecting. The share of family income devoted to fixed expenses like rent, she notes, has increased from 53 to 75 percent in the past two decades. Housing prices in most major metropolitan areas have risen six times faster than household incomes, and household debt has ballooned to over 130 percent of disposable income. Which is why the well-educated teachers, designers, and writers she interviews find it difficult to afford homes, health insurance, and child care. U.S. News talked to her about why so many capable adults feel squeezed. Excerpts:

Financially speaking, life has been harder than you expected. Why?
As a college-educated professional, I had expectations for what a middle-class lifestyle would be like. They weren't extravagant, but by my late 30s I thought I'd be able to afford health insurance, an apartment, and the occasional vacation. I certainly thought I'd be in a financial position to consider having children. Instead, at 36, I was living with a roommate in New York, barely able to cover even the basics.

Other professionals were also finding it difficult?
These kinds of financial struggles were affecting almost everyone I knew: people who were college-educated, had good jobs, and had essentially done everything you're supposed to do to be successful. But with wages in most middle-class jobs stagnating and the costs of college, housing, and healthcare going up, people found their salaries didn't stretch far enough. If people are spending money on clothes and restaurant meals, it's easy to cut back. But with fixed expenses, you can't just say, "I think we'll skip the mortgage or child care payment this month."

So what's changed?
Professionals don't earn less, but we don't earn more, either. Today's dual-income families may make more money, but, given the rising costs, they actually have less discretionary income than single-income families did in the '70s. Today, we have to pay for our own retirements; we have to pay for some or all of our health insurance; many of us pay a considerable amount for child care. These are expenses most of our parents didn't face.

Do we just have higher expectations than past generations?
There's a whole mythology built around the idea that you are what you make and, by extension, what you can afford. And since we're living in a consumer economy, we're encouraged to spend like crazy, even if it means going into a frightening amount of debt. But we can't simply write off the financial problems of today's middle class as the result of greed. Consumer spending hasn't risen since the 1970s. We may have more electronics, but those electronics are cheaper.

You came up with a creative solution to make it possible to become a parent.
I'm a single parent, and, because I couldn't afford to both support myself and my son and spend time with him, I wound up moving back with my parents. It was a huge life change, and that certainly entailed a shift in my expectations. I had to spend a fair amount of time getting beyond the shame I felt that I couldn't "make it on my own." [But] it was the best decision I could have made. I think it is a great exampleof the type of recalibrating we need to do.

There's another couple in the book who, despite earning quite low salaries in education and the arts, managed to stow away enough money to spend six months traveling through South America with their son. They chose to forgo a lot of middle-class comforts—like saving for a house—but they felt the experience was worth the sacrifice.

What needs to change? Are there steps individuals can take?
Understand your financial obligations, from mortgages to credit card payments. Opt for the simplest financing options. Take steps to [make] your children financial-ly literate. Accept that you may have to lower your material expectations. That might mean not be-ing able to afford a house by 35. It doesn't mean you've failed; it means economic circumstances beyond your control have changed. Most important, don't buy into the "you are what you make" value sys-tem. Stretch to fill your life in nonmaterial ways.

Do you have any policy recommendations?
As intelligent, articulate members of the political system, we are in a position to demand more federal support for education, housing, child care, healthcare, and retirement. This is far more than just a financial issue; it's a moral issue about the shifting values of a country where a staggering number of people cannot manage to get by.

GenXers Not Falling Behind.

I don't get the point of all this stuff about GenX falling behind. I, am in the GenX cohort, and I'm doing what I've always wanted to do. I wanted higher education and to travel while I was still young, and to try out different career paths. I did all of it by the time I turn 37 years old. And, with the current recession...It's now August 2009...must all Americans have had the rug pulled out from underneath them. It's all in how you deal with your life that matters the most.

Angie of MD @ Aug 13, 2009 11:39:55 AM

The Greediest Generation

I am a baby boomer, but I revile my own generation.

They were the children and grandchildren of the Greatest Generation, who understood the idea of sacrifice and the effort of a nation as a whole.

There is a good reason that the Baby Boomers became the first me generation. No generation in history had benefited from massive government support of higher education, which allowed the boomers to attain the most affluent lifestyle in American history, yet as soon as they got to the working world and started paying taxes they slammed down on paying high enough taxes to give the generation that followed them the same level of government paid for education that would allow them to get the same kind of education and the same kind of well paying jobs that would allow them a shot at climbing the same ladder.

As soon as the boomers made it to the top of the economic heap, they pulled the ladder up after them

Before World War II, only a small fraction of Americans were able to afford a college education. After World War II, as a reward for service and sacrifice, the U.S. Government created the GI Bill, which allowed those who sacrificed, by doing military service, going onto a career where they would have reached some sort of economic security by the end of the war of the early fifties. However, the government and the parents of the boomers decided to extend government subsidization of college tuitions, plus financial aid that largely did not have to be paid back, in order to obtain a college education. The boomers themselves did not do anything to deserve this government funded higher education, which opened economic opportunities to them that would not otherwise have existed.

I would be amused, if it did not cause so much damage to other, by the boomer assertions of how much they earned and how they worked for it, when in fact, they entered the job force during the greatest period of job expansion in American history, they came to expect as a right, the pensions, medical benefits, generious vacation and sick leave time that was hard fought for by their parents and unions. They went to college when 80 percent of student financial aid came in the form of grants and scholarships that were high enough to pay tuitions that were kept low by federal and state supports, even at private universities and Ivy League Schools. 20 percent of financial were types that needed to be paid back They grew up at a time when rural economies were strong due to government supports, when parks and other public facilities were supported and well kept and safe.

But as soon as they took charge, they started the neo-conservative movement, the political wing of the Me Generation.

They cut student loans, the slashed government subsidies for tuitions, they slashed all other education funding, they sent jobs overseas, weakened public funding for parks, made the rich, richer. The flip side of the Greatest Generation

"The Greediest Generation"

Nicholas J. of GA @ Jan 25, 2009 12:48:48 PM

babyboomers

1970's generation

Cheap housing

Drugs

Freedom (trust no one over 30)

Opportunity on backs of parents sacrifices ( who they hated)

In 2000 Baby boomers in charge

Outrages housing prices for new families (boomers have two houses snowbirds)

Extensive federal drugs prosecution (jails full of junkies at tax payer expense)

Lack of freedom (courts dictate responsibilities )

Lack of opportunities due to sell out of domestic business

KId of NY @ Jan 19, 2009 13:11:58 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Places

Search for the perfect place for you and your family.

Best Careers

Careers that offer strong outlooks and high job satisfaction.

Car Rankings & Reviews

Make an informed choice when shopping for your next car.

advertisement

Slide Shows

10 Hard-Hit Housing Markets Ready to Rebound

Even with home prices still falling at the national level, a number of markets are gearing up for a rebound.

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!